Sweeping It Under the Carpet

Because western media are designed to protect the powerful, most people are more aware of smears about Assange being a Russian agent or a rapist than of his victimization by a tyrannical assault on world press freedoms, writes Caity Johnstone.

By Caitlin Johnstone

Britain’s High Court has granted the US government limited permission to appeal its extradition case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, meaning that the acclaimed journalist will continue to languish in prison for exposing US war crimes while the appeals process plays out. 

If the western media were what it purports to be, every member of the public will be acutely aware of the fact that a journalist is being imprisoned by the most powerful government on earth for exposing inconvenient facts about its war machine. Because the western media are propaganda institutions designed to protect the powerful, this fact is far from the forefront of public attention. Most people are more aware of the smears about Assange being a Russian agent or a rapist than they are of his victimization by a tyrannical assault on world press freedoms.

There is a whole other world happening just below the surface of mainstream public attention. The membrane of celebrities and entertainment and partisan bickering overlays public perception of the world almost the entire time, only occasionally being disrupted by short-lived blasts of dissonance piercing through the fog.

You’ll be reading about what Ronnie Republican said to Debbie Democrat, and it will feel so real and normal, then all of a sudden you’re getting blasted in the face with talk of Jeffrey Epstein getting suicided in prison amid reported ties to government-run sexual blackmail operations using minors for the purpose of controlling society’s leading influencers. Then it gets quickly memory-holed, the membrane returns, and it’s back to Ronnie and Debbie once again.

Listen to a reading of this article:

But before the fog returns there’s always a short-lived moment of “What?? Huh??” as you try to re-orient yourself to reality in light of the new information you just received. What you just saw is completely irreconcilable with your current view of the world, the one you’ve been fed piece-by-piece by school and mass media and internet algorithms. The clash between your comfortable existing worldview and the new information you just received causes a kind of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance, which makes it hard to hold them both at the same time.

From there, psychological compartmentalization takes over. Compartmentalizing is when we mentally separate information or experience from our existing understanding of ourselves and our world and kind of sweep it under the carpet so we don’t experience cognitive dissonance anymore. We don’t delete it; the information is still there to be accessed if we want to, but it’s placed in a separate file and treated as though it exists in a parallel alternate reality.

Compartmentalization sometimes comes into play when a wife discovers that her husband has been sexually molesting their child; she files the information away into a separate container, because the way that information would shatter her world if she held onto it is too frightening and the cognitive dissonance of holding both worlds at the same time too uncomfortable.

Compartmentalization comes in when we’re scrolling through our news feed and see something about the horrors that are being unleashed upon Yemen with the help of our government; it doesn’t square with the model of the world we’ve been trained to hold in our minds, so we dissociate it from our model.

It comes in when we remember that we were lied to about Iraq. It comes in when we think about what humankind’s way of living on this planet is doing to our ecosystem. It comes in when we think about the fact that nuclear weapons are a thing and that cold war tensions are escalating. It comes in when we are reminded that our government is participating in the torture and imprisonment of a journalist whose only crime was trying to bring the truth out from the locked files it’s been hidden away in so we can make it a part of our worldview.

The cost of coming out of compartmentalization into a worldview of integrity is cognitive dissonance and the discomfort of constructing a new conceptual frameworkfor reality. But the reward is having a perspective that is based on truth instead of lies.

Compartmentalization is a weapon of the propagandists. It’s a glitch in our cognitive processing which means they don’t have to work as hard to keep us living in a lie-based reality tunnel; all they have to do is construct our perception of reality for us, and from there our own psychological defense systems will do the work for them.

The oligarchic empire which rules our world is not truly hidden from view; we see signs of it all the time, it’s just too uncomfortable for most of us to look at. The monster isn’t hiding under the bed, it’s staring us right in the face and we’re looking all over the room except where it’s standing because to meet its gaze would obliterate our world.

But obliterate it we must. Lie-based worldviews are what hold the empire together; the powerful spend so much energy propagandizing us because they need to in order to retain power. Without it, we could realize that they are unleashing immense evils upon our world, and that there are a whole lot more of us than there are of them.

And this is what we must do if our species is to survive into the future. We must find a way to move past the cognitive dissonance from a lie-based way of living into a truth-based way of living, and become a truth-based species with a truth-based relationship with each other and with our ecosystem. If we keep hiding from reality, we’ll compartmentalize ourselves right out of existence.

Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, poet, and utopia prepper who publishes regularly at Medium.  Her work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking her on Facebook, following her antics on Twitter, checking out her podcast on either YoutubesoundcloudApple podcasts or Spotify, following her on Steemit, throwing some money into her tip jar on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of her sweet merchandise, buying her books Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix, Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

This article is from CaitlinJohnstone.com and re-published with permission.

3 comments for “Sweeping It Under the Carpet

  1. Rex Williams
    July 8, 2021 at 02:37

    “…..a truth-based way of living, and become a truth-based species with a truth-based relationship with each other and with our ecosystem”.

    I would have to say that using the current example of Yemen with all the criminal players in that game, not one of which has justified their involvement or apologised for their inhumane actions, to my mind makes a truth-based way of living seem to be an almost impossible objective.

    For those old enough to remember the standoff in 1962 caused by the Russian presence in Cuba…known as the Cuban Missile Crisis……which created a potential to make a Russian presence a threat to mainland USA, you will remember the urgent need for the US to resolve this issue. Now that was an object lesson. When the US was threatened in its own geography and the panic station button was almost pushed, how the picture changed.

    The US with its “exceptional” arrogance needs to live under a constant threat in its own part of the world, being perhaps the single factor that will keep it from trying to control the rest of the world, thousands of miles from its own shores, through hegemonic wars and deadly sanctions.

    Imagine a vessel moored in New York equipped with a nuclear warhead primed and radio-controlled. What a bargaining chip!

    You couldn’t wish that on anyone. But nor could you have wished all the deadly US aggression since the end of World War II. Multi millions dead, and for what?

  2. michael888
    July 7, 2021 at 19:20

    Julian Assange had the misfortune to publish his investigative journalism at a time when American whistleblowers were being imprisoned in record numbers, and our anti-propaganda law (Smith Mundt) was being “modernized” to allow the CIA and State Department to control our mainstream media (only six owners). Our Official Narrative is now State Media, similar to that of the Gestapo, Stasi and KGB, but more sophisticated and better policed. The Government (unconstitutionally, but unchallenged) also tells Silicon Valley to censor anything that threatens the Official Narrative. I don’t see alternative news sites surviving long unless they fall in line with the State.
    Free Speech was once so revered in the US that SCOTUS ruled multiple times that “Hate Speech is Free Speech”. Now Free Speech is reviled, and will soon be criminal. It is one thing that the clowns in DC control political speech (protests are infiltrated and stopped by instigated violence anyway), however this “consensus view only” extends even to science and medicine. The Official Narrative that “Covid-19 DID NOT come from a lab!” protected a small cadre of bat coronavirus virologists and the people who funded and collaborated with them, but allowed no scientific discussions and discourse that may have saved millions of lives. But obviously censoring dissenting views is more important than lives.

  3. Linda Furr
    July 7, 2021 at 18:04

    Read the last page of the 1991 NATO Security Investment Plan [NSIP 1991]. All that devastation you and I see in the photo from Yemen above is pure money heading to pockets of US contractors.

    We cry for the buildings laid waste in Yemen, Gaza, Syria, Libya, Iraq while the wealthiest among our US investor class sit back in contentment knowing their ‘agency’ in the Military Industrial Complex is being ‘maximized’ … again.

Comments are closed.