Letter Demands Sweden Probe Misdeeds in Assange Case

A Scandinavian group has launched an appeal to the Swedish government to investigate misdeeds in the investigation of sexual allegations against Julian Assange.

By Joe Lauria
Special to Consortium News

A Scandinavian activist group has opened signatures for an appeal to the Swedish government for “a full and transparent investigation” into a “possible disappearance of documents” and the “illegal destruction of evidence” in the Swedish prosecutors and police probe of sexual allegations against Julian Assange. 

The appeal also demands Assange’s release from Belmarsh prison in London where he is on remand in an extradition request by the United States on espionage charges for unauthorized possession and dissemination of classified material. It calls on Sweden to provide him asylum.

The investigation the appeal seeks would also look into why Assange’s case appears to have exceeded a statute of limitations as well as into pressure British authorities brought to bear on a Swedish prosecutor against Assange. 

Sweden has three times dropped the case against the imprisoned WikiLeaks publisher. The appeal acts on the findings of Nils Melzer, the United Nations special rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, who said Swedish police forged evidence in the case against Assange.

Some of the early signers of the appeal.

A month after WikiLeaks published the Afghan War Diaries in 2010, two women went to the police in Sweden to ask if Assange could be tested for sexually transmitted disease after having unprotected relations with both of them. One of the women later texted that she had been “railroaded” by police into making a formal complaint about rape and refused to sign her statement. 

The next day Sweden’s chief prosecutor dismissed the allegations. She said: “I don’t think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape.”

After Swedish authorities told him he was free to go, Assange returned to London when an extradition request was issued by a prosecutor, not a judge, and he was arrested in December 2010. This came after Swedish police had altered the statement of one of the women who had refused to sign it, in a way that permitted the case to be re-opened, according to Melzer’s investigation. He  said: 

“I speak fluent Swedish and was thus able to read all of the original documents. I could hardly believe my eyes: According to the testimony of the woman in question, a rape had never even taken place at all. And not only that: The woman’s testimony was later changed by the Stockholm police without her involvement in order to somehow make it sound like a possible rape. I have all the documents in my possession, the emails, the text messages.”

While still in the police station, she wrote a text message to a friend saying that she didn’t want to incriminate Assange, that she just wanted him to take an HIV test, but the police were apparently interested in «getting their hands on him.» The police wrote down her statement and immediately informed public prosecutors. … two hours later, a headline appeared on the front page of Expressen, a Swedish tabloid, saying that Julian Assange was suspected of having committed two rapes. […]

The statement was edited without the involvement of the woman in question and it wasn’t signed by her. It is a manipulated piece of evidence out of which the Swedish authorities then constructed a story of rape. … The Swedish authorities, though, were never interested in testimony from Assange. They intentionally left him in limbo. Just imagine being accused of rape for nine-and-a-half years by an entire state apparatus and by the media without ever being given the chance to defend yourself because no charges had ever been filed.”

Melzer. (UN Photo)

After he exhausted his appeals in British courts to fight extradition to Sweden, Assange sought and received political asylum from the government of Ecuador in its London embassy on June 19, 2012. Assange and his lawyers said at the time they feared onward extradition from Sweden to the U.S. to face charges for publishing classified material, a fear that was realized on the day he was arrested and dragged out of the embassy on April 11, 2019.

 

The text of the appeal:

“Set Julian Assange Free”

Appeal to the Swedish government.

The whistle blower website Wikileaks’ founder Julian Assange is detained in the British high security prison Belmarsh. His health is in a critical condition. We, the signatories of this appeal, fear for his life and mental health due to the treatment he is exposed to. We demand his immediate release, respect for his fundamental human rights, a fair and transparent judicial treatment and protection against extradition to USA.

The United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, Nils Melzer, visited Julian Assange in prison on 9 May 2019 with a group of medical doctors. They concluded that Assange showed “all symptoms that are typical consequences of prolonged mental torture.”

We are deeply alarmed by the UN findings concerning Assange’s state of health and of the legal proceedings he has been subjected to, in particular by the Swedish police from 2010 and onwards.

Assange was arrested for breach of bail in the UK, an act which is not a crime, as he feared extradition to Sweden for accusations of rape raised by the Swedish police. Melzer holds that Assange’s subsequent fear of extradition to Sweden and then further to the US was well founded.

The UN report argues that this and a number of other serious breaches of law may have been carried out by the authorities during the process against Assange. Sweden has, since it started this ball to roll, under the Protection from Torture treaty (CAT) a responsibility also for the pain inflicted upon Assange in Belmarsh and Britain. The Swedish prosecutor and police have refused to respond to claims presented in letter of 12 September 2019. Not to respond to the Melzer/UN report and the serious accusations it presents is unacceptable. It undermines the authority of the United Nations. And the public is entitled to this information if respect for judicial institutions is to be upheld.

We, the signatories of this appeal, find the report by the United Nations rapporteur on torture and of the UN’s office on arbitrary detention deeply alarming.

We demand the immediate release of Julian Assange from British prison and that he be granted asylum in Sweden or another country of his choice, guaranteed not to be extradited to the US. The present coronavirus threat aggravates the situation even further and makes his release even more pressing.

We further demand that the Swedish ministry of justice respond to the allegations brought forth by the said UN authorities and instruct appropriate Swedish legal action be taken for

  • a full and transparent investigation into a possible disappearance of documents, alleged by the UN report, in order to clarify if/or to what extent illegal destruction of evidence and perversion of the course of justice has taken place – a full and transparent investigation into why the case against Assange has been stretched out over years when Swedish law sets a strict limit of months for such proceedings
  • a full and transparent investigation into the nature of co-operation between Swedish and British police with the alleged aim of conducting extra-legal arrest, harassment and detention of Julian Assange and with the possible aim of extraditing him to a third country
  • that Sweden respect the United Nations by fulfilling its obligations to inter alia the following international treaties, of which it is a signatory state: The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT, ratified 1986); the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR, ratified 1971); International Law Commission, The International Wrongful Act of A State (ILC/IWAS).

We finally demand that Julian Assange be given a fair treatment in accordance with principles of basic human rights and the rule of law and that any wrongdoing against him brought about by representatives of the Swedish authorities be rectified and fully compensated for in accordance with Swedish law. 

Open for signatures at: www.setjulianfree.org.

Among the first signers are Noam Chomsky, John Pilger, Assange’s father John Shipton, NSA whistleblower Tom Drake, German journalist Günter Wallraff, and former UN Assistant Secretary General Dennis Halliday.

Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief of Consortium News and a former correspondent for The Wall Street Journal, Boston GlobeSunday Times of London and numerous other newspapers. He began his professional career as a stringer for The New York Times.  He can be reached at joelauria@consortiumnews.com and followed on Twitter @unjoe .

14 comments for “Letter Demands Sweden Probe Misdeeds in Assange Case

  1. Lily
    May 19, 2020 at 07:50

    @Martin – Swedish Citizen

    The conduct not only of Sweden but of all Western Democracies and its Main Media is apalling. The English Empire is no empire any more. They stick to the US to at least give the impression of being still an empire. Julian Assange deserves better. It makes me so sad that there seems to be nothing we can do apart from signing petitions.

    Tnank you Consortium News for not giving up and fighting against this awful injustice.

    Lily – German Citizen

  2. dean 1000
    May 16, 2020 at 22:02

    Thanks for the link Nathan

    Mr. Li makes interesting statements. But it should surprise no one that the most populous country would have the largest economy, although many westerners will be surprised given the cultural bias we imbibe from the time we are children.

    Eric Li calls western governments democracies or elective democracies. Western governments are not democracies and were never meant to be democracies. Some of the Scandinavian governments are highly democratic but are still republics.

    Understanding western governments begins with understanding the classical western political definitions of government. The people who founded the US used the classical definition of aristocracy – “where the few rule the many.” They had to settle for republics not least because they understood Aristotle’s truism that the size of a democracy is limited the range of a man’s voice. So 535 national legislators now rule 330 million Americans. If legislators represent the interests of constituents as the constituents define their interests the republic is democratic.
    In the state governments the people can pass laws by initiative petition. It is democratic but not democracy because the legislative body of the few can alter or abolish laws passed by the people.

    Eric Li says the Chinese government constantly takes surveys to find out what people want. If the Chinese government does what it can to bring the results of the surveys into reality, it is anything but authoritarian. To exaggerate no more than the political class in the US exaggerates, the Chinese government is democracy by survey rather than by election.

  3. Me Myself
    May 16, 2020 at 19:42

    I am curious the effect a petition would have presenting it to the likes of lets say Genghis Khan?

    You just handed him a list of names he would have most assuredly Go Looking For and to do what he did best! Right?

  4. dean 1000
    May 16, 2020 at 19:13

    Thanks so much Scandinavian activists. I am happy and proud to have signed your
    Petition.

  5. KChohan
    May 16, 2020 at 10:55

    Transparency is especially vital when a state is accused of criminal behaviour. The Swedish model has always been widely admired, but this apparent behaviour is unbefitting. It also raises huge issues about Washington. If ‘the swamp’ can coerce supposedly independent states in this way, the future looks very dystopian, particularly for US people.

    • Gayle McDonald
      May 17, 2020 at 02:23

      Assange Should be Released IMMEDIATELY Australia should Protest f our his Release IMMEDIATELY.

  6. Colleen Mitrow
    May 16, 2020 at 09:50

    Set Free this Innocent man!

  7. Arielle
    May 16, 2020 at 07:27

    I have never understood the grounds on which the US would be able to extradite Mr. Assange from abroad. How is it “illegal” for a foreign national to expose true information on the US, and at what point does US have right to punish that foreign national? Terrible precedent!

    • Greg Wood
      May 18, 2020 at 06:47

      How is it ‘illegal’ for a nation such as Venezuela or Iran to run their affairs in a way that is disagreeable to the desires and demands of the US?

  8. Andrew Thomas
    May 15, 2020 at 16:27

    Bravo to all signers and to Mr. Lauria for his coverage.

    • Martin - Swedish citizen
      May 16, 2020 at 02:46

      Fully agree.

      The conduct of the Swedish government and the silence of Swedish media is appalling.

  9. W Hamilton
    May 15, 2020 at 16:05

    Most people have now forgotten the reporting on Assange’s alleged rapes, which occurred over a decade ago. At that time I strongly suspected a classic honey trap used by spy agencies.

    My opinion is now reinforced by the fact that Assange’s chief accuser Anna Ardin (presumably AA in Nils Melser’s report) has never come forward to protest the horrendous abuse Assange has suffered as a result of her accusations.

  10. Nathan Mulcahy
    May 15, 2020 at 14:18

    Sad doesn’t even describe my feeling about the state of the “western democratic” system. Has it always been like this – only that most people were fooled by its propaganda? Or is it more a question of degeneration of an otherwise noble system? The reality may well lie somewhere in the middle.

    For sure, the western democratic system is definitely not what we have been told, and what we have been shoving down the throat of black and brown people all over the world, with napalm and bombs, if need be.

    There are, and must be, other options, as Eric Li points out in this short presentation. And there cannot be just one universal solution…

    see: youtube.com/watch?v=s0YjL9rZyR0

    • May 15, 2020 at 17:36

      A short afternoon´s reading of the histories if the British and American Empires will show that political lynchings, extra judicial executions and illegal detentions in prisons always have been and still are common practice against people who have exposed the attrocities that the Empires have committed. So the answer to your question is yes.

Comments are closed.