Shocked over Senate’s Gitmo Rhetoric

A citizen who attended a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing about Guantanamo Bay was so shocked by the ugly rhetoric from some senators that she spoke up and was arrested. Now in an open letter, Helen Schietinger is asking Sen. McCain to use his chairmanship to finally close the prison.

Dear Senator McCain,

I am the woman who spoke out in the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the status of the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay on February 5th. I’m sure you heard my words, “Give them the rights of prisoners of war!” before I was arrested.

I attended the hearing in an orange jump suit to silently protest the very existence of Guantanamo prison, and I expected to hear a reasonably rational discussion of the prison and its future.

Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, appearing on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

I planned to listen respectfully, holding my sign reading “I died waiting for justice: Adnan Latif, Died September 8, 2012,” to remind the Senators and administration officials that Adnan Latif either committed suicide or was killed at Guantanamo after ten years of torture and unjust detention, and six years after being cleared for release.

The Capitol police appropriately allowed me to peacefully express my opposition to Guantanamo in that public forum. I was so shocked, however, by the vitriol of the senators who chose to attend the hearing that I felt I had to respond.

I was appalled by their hateful statements, statements that contribute to a hostile climate that foments tragic hate crimes. Less than a week after the hearing three young Muslim Americans were murdered in North Carolina almost certainly because they were Muslim.

Although Senator [Lindsey] Graham talked about following the laws of war and the principles of the Geneva Conventions, his Senate colleagues made it clear that they care little about such things.

Senator [Tom] Cotton would have more Muslim men locked up as terrorists in Guantanamo without due process. He certainly wouldn’t want them tried in an open court where they could face their accusers and challenge the evidence used against them:  “The only problem with Guantanamo Bay is that there are too many empty beds and cells. We should be sending more terrorists there to keep this country safe. As far as I’m concerned, every last one of them can rot in hell. But as long as they don’t do that then they can rot in Guantanamo Bay.”

Senator [Joe] Manchin thinks the detainees are not being treated harshly enough: “I’d like to see a few of them in the United States hardened prisons to see if they’d change their attitude just a little bit. I know we could do a little different job on ‘em here than they’re doing over there.”

And when I exhorted the committee to at least give the men at Guantanamo the rights of prisoners of war, Sen. Manchin responded by saying, “I just want to say, their attack on this country, they lost their rights.” Think about that: a U.S. Senator doesn’t think that human beings in U.S. custody should have rights. Not one Senator spoke up in disagreement.

I wonder if Sen. Manchin shares the attitude of former Vice President Dick Cheney who, when asked for comment on the torture practices revealed by the Senate Intelligence Committee report of early December, replied: “I’d do it again in a minute.” Indeed, it sounded to me as though several of your colleagues are of Cheney’s mindset.

I must ask, what about you, Sen. McCain? And, if not, why have you not publicly distanced yourself from Cheney’s remarks and those of your Senate colleagues?

I remember admiring your doing what you could to rebuff Cheney and then CIA Director Porter Goss, when they descended on your office to plead for a CIA exemption from the amendment you were pushing banning torture.

As a captive in North Vietnam, you had first-hand experience with torture. Given that, and recalling your principled opposition to torture a decade ago, it is painful for me to watch you sit placidly as some of your colleagues indulge in hateful demagoguery. I trust that you are particularly aware of the importance of upholding the rights and dignity of all prisoners, including those held in U.S. custody.

As ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, you took active part in the Senate Armed Forces Committee Inquiry Into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody. The “First Conclusion” of the report released on December 11, 2008 stated that a Presidential Order signed by President George W. Bush “opened the door to considering aggressive techniques.”

The report noted specifically that on Feb. 7, 2002, the President issued a written determination that the Geneva Convention protections for POWs did not apply to al-Qaeda or Taliban detainees, and that following that determination, techniques like waterboarding were authorized for use in interrogation. It would take more than four years for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule, in June 2006, that the prisoners’ right to habeas corpus rights was being violated by the Military Commissions Act.

This year marks the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta with which courageous English nobles wrested from King John the writ of habeas corpus and other rights. I am embarrassed for my country that President Bush suspended that fundamental right for so many years, and “opened the door” for torture. Worse still, torture continues at Guantanamo, and you and others in high office have the power to stop it.

Guantanamo detainees were subjected to torture techniques masked as “enhanced interrogation” (waterboarding, multiple forms of sensory deprivation, sensory overload and sexual humiliation , the list goes on and on). And you and your Senate colleagues should remember that they are still being subjected to torture (e.g., long-term solitary confinement, brutal forced-feeding procedures, forcible cell extractions) as well as outrages upon their personal dignity (e.g., genital searches and cavity searches before and after meeting with their lawyers).

Senator McCain, I imagine you may regret calling “lowlife scum” those of us who, at Congressional hearings, speak out against consigning the Magna Carta, the Constitution, and the rule of law to the dustbin of history. With all due respect, it is “lowlife” for public officials to pander to the worst of human instincts revenge, racism, and scapegoating no matter how many votes such appeals might garner. It does you no credit to preside and sit by nonchalantly at the shameful hearing on February 5 at which I am proud to have been arrested.

You need to use your chairmanship to restore respect for the rule of law, and lift the United States out of the category of rogue state. In the name of common decency, I urge you, as Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to insist that the U.S. begin according the Guantanamo prisoners in U.S. custody their lawful human rights.

Yours truly,

Helen Schietinger

Washington, DC

4 comments for “Shocked over Senate’s Gitmo Rhetoric

  1. Theodora B. Crawford
    February 23, 2015 at 19:42

    Am I crazy or haven’t some of the Guantanamo detainees been cleared for release but they still sit and rot in the prison because we have determined there is no safe place to send them! There is a savage, meanness escalating in our country that frightens me for the sake of our children. For a while, I was proud to be an American but this pride is rapidly fading; cited comments by our elected (legally or not?) officials are more than disturbing; they represent the worst of humanity. We must individually pay attention and do what we can to reverse this descent into self-destruction.

  2. Hank
    February 20, 2015 at 14:40

    The so-called “Islamic State” is doing these warmongering “leaders” a big favor and they know it! How many times have we already seen images of McCain being real friendly to ISIS fighters? These “leaders” are bought and sold by the military/industrial/intelligence mafia and what they need to do in their capacity a “congressmen” is to make sure that the conditions are always ripe for war and conflict. This is nothing new in a nation that saw President Eisenhower himself, one of the most decorated war heroes of all time, warn the nation in his farewell address of the undue influence and power of the military-industrial complex. Just three years after this warning President Kennedy was gunned down i Dallas as a president who was standing in the way of the war makers. Lady – – you weren’t protesting to responsible leaders in that hearing room, but REAL American traitors in the same light that shown at Nuremberg against Nazi war criminals! Don’t be surprised at all by their gruff and unintelligent manners- ISIS and just about every other “enemy” that the USG tries top scare us with are nothing more than tools used by the USA, Israel and their “allies” to “justify” the human liberty clampdown known as the “war on terror”!

  3. Rob Roy
    February 19, 2015 at 18:51

    Thank you, Ms. Schietinger. Beautifully written. Guantanamo has made me sick for years. It’s incredible that our country’s leaders are so immoral.

  4. Bill Bodden
    February 19, 2015 at 13:29

    It is interesting that there is so little comment on the Islamic State’s practice of clothing their victims before execution in Guantanamo-orange jump suits. Has the apparent symbolism escaped commentators? The courageous Ms. Schietinger seems to understand.

Comments are closed.