Slovakia Defies the Kochs and Cato

Exclusive: For the past decade, the people of the small central European nation of Slovakia have suffered under a harsh and corrupt “privatization” scheme devised by the Koch Brothers’ Cato Institute. However, in weekend elections, they defied their oligarchs by voting for a left-of-center “populist” party, reports Mark Ames.

By Mark Ames

On Saturday, the tiny EU nation Slovakia held parliamentary elections, and the results surprised the “experts”: The center-left party Smer, derisively described as “populist” in the American media, won in a record landslide, the first time a single party will control the majority in parliament in Slovakia’s post-Communist history.

The “populist” Smer won on an unexpectedly large turnout of 60 percent –the so-called experts had been assuring readers there’d be a low turnout of 40 percent.

Billionaires Charles and David Koch, who helped found the libertarian Cato Institute

The high turnout reflects real suffering for the people of Slovakia that goes well beyond mere cynicism, they’re suffering from real, mass impoverishment, brought on by a decade of brutal free-market reforms, which hit the privatized pensions especially hard. That’s where we Americans come in, specifically the Cato Institute, but I’ll get to that in a moment.

Although there’s been almost no coverage of Slovakia’s mass protest movement, the country has seen the largest demonstrations since the Velvet Revolution. The protests were sparked in part by the “Gorilla” scandal, leaked recordings of Slovakia’s free-market politicians negotiating their bribes with bankers from a top hedge fund, Penta, in exchange for Penta’s lucrative privatization deals.

But what’s sustained the protests, and what brought people out to vote in droves for the “populists,” is the mass impoverishment that’s worsened life for most of Slovakia’s citizens, and first to suffer have been Slovakia’s pensioners, who are forced to subsist on roughly $400 per month.

Here’s where the Cato Institute, the libertarian think-tank founded by the Koch brothers, comes in, and where Slovakia’s problems become our problems.

In the early 2000’s, the co-chairman of the Cato Institute’s Project on Social Security Privatization, José Piñera, played a key role advising and overseeing Slovakia’s mass pension privatization, which passed in 2003 under the free-market government of Mikulas Dzurinda. Today, Slovakia’s retirees are groaning under the austerity pain administered to them by the Cato Institute.

José Piñera, who has led Cato’s Social Security Privatization Project since the 1990s, has a dark history of administering pain on a nationwide scale: Piñera served in the military junta under Chile’s Generalissimo Augusto Pinochet, first as Pinochet’s Minister for Labor, helping suppress unions in one of the most brutal dictatorships in the world; later, Piñera oversaw Pinochet’s radical privatization of Chile’s pension program.

Today, Chile suffers one of the worst wealth inequality problems in the developed world. And for the past two decades, José Piñera, working at the Cato Institute, has been trying to impose the same pension austerity on Americans.

It’s a match made in Hell: Cato and the Koch brothers have been pushing to dismantle Social Security since the Kochs up the Cato Institute in the late 1970s. Thanks to the Cato Institute’s tireless efforts, today dismantling Social Security is practically gospel in the Republican Party, and not far off the top of the “To Do” list for some “centrist” Democrats either.

Sacking Slovakia

Cato’s José Piñera was brought in to oversee Slovakia’s pension privatization only after the 2002 elections put in power the free-market rightwing Democratic and Christian Union Party, led by Prime Minister Mikulas Dzurinda. The pensions were privatized in 2003, along with a free-market program that lowered the top tax rate to a flat 19 percent, eliminated inheritance taxes, and generally shifted the burden down the economic scale.

The reforms were wildly unpopular with Slovaks, to the same degree that they were popular with Western bankers and banking institutions like the World Bank, which named Slovakia the world’s top economic reformer in 2004, and one of the top 20 business-friendly nations in the world.

In 2005, Bush’s ambassador to Slovakia co-authored a glowing article with Cato’s Marian Tupy, praising Dzurinda’s pension privatization, and noting Cato’s José Piñera’s role in making Slovakia’s pension reforms happen. In their article, they ominously compared Slovakia’s pre-reform pension “crisis” to America’s “crisis” in Social Security.

The timing of the joint Cato-Bush praise for Slovakia’s pension privatization was interesting for a couple of reasons:

First, because the same free-market government that Cato advised and Cato-Bush praised has now been implicated in cutting secret kickback deals with leading hedge fund to sell off Slovakia’s state assets in exchange for millions in bribes; and secondly, that year, 2005, was the year President Bush made his big push to privatize America’s Social Security program, with the Cato Institute as both the lead adviser and promoter.

The Bush-Cato plan to privatize Social Security began over dinner in 1997, when Bush was still governor of Texas. Ed Crane, the president of Cato, and José Piñera, Cato’s co-chair of the Social Security Privatization Project, flew to Austin to sell the future president on their plan to privatize Social Security.

According to the Washington Post: “Crane said that after Piñera’s presentation, Bush declared, ‘This is the most important policy issue facing the United States today.’”

As soon as Bush was elected President, he set up a commission to privatize Social Security, and staffed it with the Cato Institute’s free-market zealots. Unfortunately for them, the 9/11 attacks distracted the Administration. But in 2005, Bush made Social Security privatization his top priority for his second term, and once again, he put the Cato Institute in charge.

By the end of 2005, however, Bush’s presidency was practically in tatters as the country turned against his wars, and Hurricane Katrina made privatizing Social Security politically impossible. The project to do to America what Cato did to Slovakia was essentially abandoned, and the Cato Institute turned critic of Bush’s war on terror policies.

A Family Project

Lately, Cato’s José Piñera has seen his younger brother, billionaire Sebastian Piñera, making international news as Chile’s most unpopular president since democracy replaced the free-market military junta of Generalissimo Augusto Pinochet in 1990.

Thanks to younger brother Sebastian’s free-market privatization of Chile’s education system, the country has erupted in nationwide protests and violence on a level not seen since, well, Generalissimo Pinochet overthrew Chile’s democratically elected government in 1973, and installed a brutal regime that crushed dissent and murdered and tortured thousands, handing the economy over to free-market fanatics including Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman, and Sebastian’s brother, José Piñera.

Neither age, nor time, nor working at the American-based Cato Institute, dining with future presidents and convincing them to gut the population’s Social Security, has mellowed this former Pinochet sidekick’s distaste for democracy. As Piñera wrote in 2003,

“To hand over a blank check to inherently unstable majorities concerning virtually all the major economic, social, and political issues of a society is to institutionalize instability, open the way to more serious abuses, and condemn a country to underdevelopment. How is anyone to make rational decisions about work, savings, and investment if key variables, such as taxes, labor legislation, and regulations, can be altered by 50.01 percent of the citizens through a vote that, in countries with low levels of education, can almost never be said to show the characteristics of an ‘informed vote’?”

On Saturday, the Slovaks voted overwhelmingly to reject the damage and plunder that the Cato Institute’s advisers wreaked on that tiny country’s citizens. Naturally, to free-market zealots like the Piñeras, the Kochs, the Cato Institute and the rest of the oligarchy’s minions, this only proves their point about why democracy must be “limited.”

The people can’t be relied on to vote the way oligarchs want them to, they can’t be relied on to react with cynicism and defeatism to all the news of political and corporate corruption.

The hope among the elites in Slovakia and elsewhere was that the voters’ mass impoverishment and anger would lead to a withdrawal from politics, but the high voter turnout turned out to be perhaps the greatest victory for the people of Slovakia. The politicians are to be expected to sell out and disappoint, but the more engaged in their democracy the people are, the more power they’ll have to eventually change their politics for the better, and finally bring an end to the rotten politics of oligarchy and plunder that mark our age.

Mark Ames is editor of The eXiled Online and author of the book Going Postal: Rage, Murder and Rebellion from Reagan’s Workplaces to Clinton’s Columbine and co-author with Matt Taibbi of The eXile: Sex, Drugs and Libel in the New Russia

9 comments for “Slovakia Defies the Kochs and Cato

  1. Jim Faubel
    March 14, 2012 at 12:33

    Congratulations to the people of Slovakia. Let’s hope there are enough knowledgeable Americans this November who will get out and vote and do the same thing here.

  2. Susie Pryor
    March 13, 2012 at 23:25

    “People” like the Koch Bros are so egotistical and avaricious, that their intent is to destroy the confidence of others in their government to the point of apathy. The end goal is to make them feel they should “just stay home”.

  3. rosemerry
    March 13, 2012 at 02:42

    Please read Pam Martens’ article in Counterpunch on the “poor, libertarian Cato institute” and the Koch Bros. Sorry I cannot do links, but it is the latest counterpunch.

  4. bobzz
    March 12, 2012 at 14:26

    Bush rationalized tax cuts as putting more money in people’s pockets to let them determine how they wanted to spend it. In reality, the tax cuts, largesse to the rich, but the “trickle” for the average Joe and Jane went into circulation and deeper credit card debt, not savings. The really devious purpose of the tax cuts meant to starve popular social programs, which, incidentally, benefitted more whites than blacks. By deliberately throwing the country into deep debt, by sustaining the military at unholy levels, the only thing left to tap was SS, Medicare, and Medicaid. As long as Americans are treated like mushrooms partly by the fawning corporate media (thanks to Ray McGovern for the image) and their own dedication to a false idolatry of nationalism (we can do no wrong because we are a Christian nation), we will continue the path to becoming a third world country—unless our bellicose militarism leads to a worldwide destruction the likes of which will make WW II look like a skirmish. If only we, like Slovakia, could awaken from our dream.

  5. lYNNE
    March 12, 2012 at 13:37

    Once again, these real time facts never reach the masses in America. Our corporate-owned media and rightwing lobbyist hosts on AM will not allow it.
    These same failed policies are failing in the UK, Ireland and Spain, but hardly anyone knows it. The irony is that the right will attack Obama for being a European Socialist but they would implement the same failed austerity/privatization policies that are failing there once they were in power. Madness!

    • bobzz
      March 12, 2012 at 16:03

      I’m talking too much, but I have to agree with this post. Socialism is a “scare word.” Are we our brothers’ keepers?If we want a decent society, yes. It may surprise many but those lazy socialists in Europe have more Fortune 500 countries than America plus a healthcare system that serves all at HALF the cost of the American system. We cry unfair when China subsidizes its solar industry to the tune of $38 billion without stopping to realize it works! Who says government does not create jobs: from Roosevelt’s conservation corps to Eisenhower’s interstate system to Reagan’s buildup of the military industry to Obama’s saving the American auto industry. Senseless ideology has replaced America’s once sensible pragmatism.

      • bobzz
        March 13, 2012 at 00:33

        that is Fortune 500 companies.

  6. Karen Romero
    March 12, 2012 at 12:57

    Thank you to Mark Ames for writing this article. And, another big thank you to Robert Parry and the Consortium News staff for publishing the pictures. This is of great healing to me at times. Once again I printed the article to save to read later, but more importantly I tore the picture from the article and wadded up the picture in a ball, then deposited the Koch brothers in the proper recepticle!

    The kinds of things Glenn Beck doesn’t tell on his radio show…that he has secret meetings with the Koch brothers on what to do about our country. HUH?
    Did anybody elect Glenn Beck, Charles or David Koch to office? I must have missed that election.

  7. March 12, 2012 at 12:44

    If it comes down to a decision between Summers and Sachs (the most prominently mentioned candidates for the World Bank presidency), we may have, hopefully, another “populist” surprise.

Comments are closed.