Russia made new allegations at the U.N. Security Council on Friday that Ukraine was working on biological weapons, which led to further clashes with the U.S. and its allies on the council.
Volume 29, Number 332— Thursday, November 21, 2024
Perhaps there is more than coincidence to explain the recent United Nations vote where the United States and Ukraine weighed in against a resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism – the only two member states of the United Nations to cast their votes in opposition – and the presence of potential existentially dangerous (with virtually the same destructive power as nuclear weapons) biological weapons laboratories located across Ukraine.
Peace.
Let us just for the sake of argument, presume Russia is correct and correct again with respect to a pending Bio attack. We have the puppet UN, not all, but most nations, claiming they are fed up with Russia bringing them into the UN headquarters over redundancy allegations. Though there is new evidence presented by Russia that is being overlooked or ignored. The fact that EU nations have not claimed that an investigation must be undertaken about this Bio Threat. The UN is undermining the security of their nations and the world. They will be to blame for failing to investigate the threat in the event of a BIO ATTACK. The ignorance of leadership in this UN body is beyond me to understand. This is all theatrics at the expense of the planet and its population. As Lavrov stated, the UN ignored Russia on their concerns of NATO weapons and NATO supporting Ukraine on Russias border. So I am in belief the UN is worthless as G W Bush the second stated when he launched his war(s). I quote, “Lets cut ties with worthless UN”.
hxxps://lasvegassun.com/news/2002/sep/13/letter-lets-cut-ties-with-worthless-un/
My previous post got THIS reply on WaPo. Poster references WaPo – again – for ‘proof.’ She apparently has not read CN for a few years….
Cecelia S. 1 hour ago
Consortium News is amplifying Russian disinformation these days? Robert Parry must be rolling in his grave. What you are linking to is blatant Kremlin lies, and has been covered here: hxxps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/west-accuses-russia-of-using-un-council-to-spread-propaganda/2022/03/18/e8881c9e-a6f3-11ec-8628-3da4fa8f8714_story.html
“The labs are not secret,” Filippa Lentzos, a senior lecturer in science and international security at King’s College London, said in an email to The Associated Press last week. “They are not being used in relation to bioweapons. This is all disinformation.”
——————-
V Anderson
Wow. There’s more. Forbes is in on the act, too. 2 articles + my ‘tipline’ reply.
hxxps://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharysmith/2022/03/10/how-russia-sowed-a-conspiracy-theory-about-us-bioweapons-in-ukraine/?sh=59a135dc5a9f
hxxps://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/tulsi-gabbard-latest-to-push-russian-backed-conspiracy-about-us-backed-biological-labs-in-ukraine/ar-AAV0peD?li=BBnbfcLo
Zach and Derek going whole-hog on Russkie ‘hoax’
Sun 3/13/2022 5:06 PM
To: tips (at)forbes.com
You can see the whole video on AlJazeera.com
Or that + transcript of US and UK screeds on Consortiumnews.com,
“WATCH: UN Security Council on Ukraine’s Bio Research”
More entertaining is this, per my Comment on CN
Glenn Greenwald is putting his stuff on youtube now. He traces ‘new’ UKR bio-weapons scare to some older pre- and post-9/11 Anthrax templates, plus newer Wuhan mysteries. All of which he had covered independently.
hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmyDGZsrQyA
What Cecelia doesn’t recall is that Bob Parry was viciously smeared as a Putin puppet and Kremlin stooge because he dared report the truth about the 2014 coup, the neo-Nazis in Ukraine, the slaughter in Donbass, etc. We rather think he would approve of our coverage of Ukraine. He accusation of linking to “Russia lies” is itself a lie as what we published was the direct feed from UN TV of the *entire* Security Council meetings on Ukraine’s bio labs with all nations speaking. We also published the texts of both the Russian *and* US ambassadors without any comment at all. Since when is providing a raw feed of a UN debate taking a position? This person clearly did not look at what we published.
Ironically, this high-IQ discussion occurs as the MSM print garbage such as this:
hxxps://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/03/19/russia-chemical-weapons-ukraine/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F365a289%2F6236068b3e6ed13ade2db8d4%2F6097399bade4e210584bf9be%2F8%2F70%2F6236068b3e6ed13ade2db8d4
I could only try to refer them to this discussion, noting the same US pattern from CN’s account of the falllout from Nebenzia’s UN presentation a week ago….
‘Another WaPo journalism major, who knows a good story. But doesn’t know Sheisst from Shinola on any of the [chemical warfare] facts. Total innuendo and anonymous sources, matched only by US screaming matches at the UN after Vassily Nebenzia continued to lay out the facts. For some intelligent feedback, try CN:’
hxxps://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/18/watch-un-security-council-on-ukraines-bio-labs/
The Three Stooges like denials of the raw evidence presented by Russia which should be investigated by independent weapons inspectors is unacceptable given how serious this matter is and why a violation of this seriousness is of the highest concern.
We need biological weapons inspectors who have the integrity of Scott Ritter to investigate.
I find it mind-blowing to hear from the U.S. representative mocking the presentation of evidence with signatures of known people in the U.S. and the names of contractors and the name of viruses studied and the outbreaks in Ukraine of illnesses.
China, Brazil, India, and others demanded the verification take place under the U.N. auspices.
There are experts who don’t have a political bone in the game who can investigate and yet the same clique of apologists for the U.S. failure to stop the war by acknowledging the security needs of Russia and agreeing to solutions before the inevitable military action that it provoked. We violated promises made to not encroach one inch in return for the Soviet Union agreeing to the unification of Germany and now it seems, unless proven otherwise that we have violated international law if the evidence presented on biological labs funded by the pentagon and acknowledged by Nuland in the Senate hearing she recently spoke at including the existence of these labs is verified.
Karl Rove: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.”
The representatives of western power elites are fond of their ability to reverse the arguments before they are even made; and impose the results on the designated enemy; in this case, the RF. (Navalny, Skripal, MH17 and the whiteHelmet fiasco pretended on ASSAD – have all been exposed as false flag anyway. )
Those lamenting Russian duplicity are duplicitous themselves by dismissing without due diligence the documents presented by the RF of bioweapons research facilities in Ukraine; disguising them as health clinics and any proofs of bioweapons research funding from USAID, as clever Russian disinformation.
So lets see BIDEN prove it. The papers documenting the evidence are presented to be validated. Not drowned under a meme deluge; but forensically contested. By scientific examination under the rules. Who has the most to loose?
RF is simply putting their evidence on the table. So, USAMO; pick it up ! Stop the bullshit posturing and prove those documents false.
Members from Brazil, China, Kenya, India, Nigeria etc all more or less state the obvious: USE the mechanisms under the present convention to investigate the facts presented.
Then, we will see who the liars and disinformation false flag peddlers really are..
why is America still supporting Nazi to this day?