The rest of the world isn’t ripping off the U.S. The American trade deficit is the result of chronically large budget deficits resulting from tax cuts for the rich combined with trillions of dollars wasted on useless wars.
By Jeffrey D. Sachs
Common Dreams
U.S. President Donald Trump is trashing the world trade system over a basic economic fallacy. He wrongly claims that America’s trade deficit is caused by the rest of the world ripping off the U.S., repeatedly stating things such as, “Over the decades, they ripped us off like no country has ever been ripped off in history…”
Trump aims to close the trade deficit by imposing tariffs, thereby impeding imports and restoring trade balance (or inducing other countries to end their rip-offs of America). Yet Trump’s tariffs will not close the trade deficit but will instead impoverish Americans and harm the rest of the world.
A country’s trade deficit (or more precisely, its current account deficit) does not indicate unfair trade practices by the surplus countries. It indicates something completely different. A current account deficit signifies that the deficit country is spending more than it is producing. Equivalently, it is saving less than it is investing.
America’s trade deficit is a measure of the profligacy of America’s corporate ruling class, more specifically the result of chronically large budget deficits resulting from tax cuts for the rich combined with trillions of dollars wasted on useless wars. The deficits are not the perfidy of Canada, Mexico, and other countries that sell more to the U.S. than the U.S. sells to them.
To close the trade deficit, the U.S. should close the budget deficit. Putting on tariffs will raise prices (such as for automobiles) but not close the trade or budget deficit, especially since Trump plans to offset tariff revenues with vastly larger tax cuts for his rich donors. Moreover, as Trump raises tariffs, the U.S. will face counter-tariffs that will directly impede U.S. exports. The result will be lose-lose for the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Let’s look at the numbers. In 2024, the U.S. exported $4.8 trillion in goods and services, and imported $5.9 trillion of goods and services, leading to a current account deficit of $1.1 trillion. That $1.1 trillion deficit is the difference between America’s total spending in 2024 ($30.1 trillion) and America’s national income ($29.0 trillion). America spends more than it earns and borrows the difference from the rest of the world.
Trump blames the rest of the world for America’s deficit, but that’s absurd. It is America that is spending more than it earns. Consider this. If you are an employee, you run a current account surplus with your employer and a deficit with the companies from which you buy goods and services. If you spend exactly what you earn, you are in current account balance. Suppose that you go on a shopping binge, spending more than your earnings by running up credit-card debt. You will now be running a current account deficit. Are the shops ripping you off, or is your profligacy driving you into debt?
“Trump blames the rest of the world for America’s deficit, but that’s absurd. It is America that is spending more than it earns.”
Tariffs will not close the trade deficit so long as the fiscal irresponsibility of the corporate raiders and tax evaders that dominate Washington continues. Suppose, for example, that Trump’s tariffs slash the imports of automobiles and other goods from abroad. Americans will then buy U.S.-produced cars and other merchandise that would have been exported. Imports will fall, but so too will exports. Moreover, new tariffs imposed by other countries in response to Trump’s tariffs will reinforce the decline in U.S. exports. The U.S. trade imbalance will remain.
While the tariffs will not eliminate the trade deficit, they will force Americans to buy high-priced U.S.-produced goods that could have been obtained at lower cost from foreign producers. The tariffs will squander what economists call the gains from trade: the ability to buy goods based on the comparative advantage of domestic and foreign producers.
The tariffs will raise prices for automobiles and wages of automotive workers, but those wage hikes will be paid by lower living standards of Americans across the economy, not by a boost of national income.
The real way to support American workers is through federal measures opposite to those favored by Trump, including universal health coverage, support for unionization and budget support for modern infrastructure, including green energy, all financed with higher, not lower, taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporate sector.
The federal government does not cover its overall spending with tax revenues because wealthy campaign donors promote tax cuts, tax avoidance (through tax havens) and tax evasion.
Remember that the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, has gutted the audit capacity of the IRS. The budget deficit is currently around $2 trillion dollars, or roughly 6 percent of U.S. national income. With a chronically high budget gap, the U.S. trade balance will remain in chronic deficit.
Trump says that he will cut the budget deficit by slashing waste and abuse through DOGE. The problem is that DOGE misrepresents the real cause of the fiscal profligacy.
The budget deficit is not due to the salaries of civil servants, who are being wantonly fired, or to the government’s R&D spending, on which our future prosperity depends, but rather to the combination of tax cuts for the rich, and reckless spending on America’s perpetual wars. U.S. funding for Israel’s non-stop wars, America’s 750 overseas military bases, the bloated C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies and interest payments on the soaring federal debt.
Trump and the congressional Republicans are reportedly taking aim at Medicaid — that is, at the poorest and most vulnerable Americans — to make way for yet another tax cut for the richest Americans. They may soon go after Social Security and Medicare too.
Trump’s tariffs will fail to close the trade and budget deficits, raise prices, and make America and the world poorer by squandering the gains from trade. The U.S. will be the enemy of the world for the harm that it is causing to itself and the rest of the world.
Jeffrey D. Sachs is a university professor and director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he directed The Earth Institute from 2002 until 2016. He is also president of the U.N. Sustainable Development Solutions Network and a commissioner of the U.N. Broadband Commission for Development.
This article is from Common Dreams.
Views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
Tariffs – just hang on a minute and we all will soon see just exactly what this all means. A minute is up already and so will inflation be up very significantly, very soon. What to do what to do! How are those 401ks holding up?
I have not seen one reference here to this Orange Bozo – Muskrat – Douche plan for restructuring the Federal Bureaucracies., which seems very interesting to me. I’m a curious guy and when I don’t get any answers or no one questions the status quo I have to wonder. WHY!
I am the cynic’s cynic. Question, has anyone given any thought about any figures which might exist on the estimated increased cost to the the U.S. government and ‘we the people’ might be stemming from the actions of trump, muskrat and co. Failures of government resulting from the DOGE actions and the recovery cost associated with said failure. Or incurred costs associated with oversights which require additional spending by those agencies involved.
I refuse to think this man has a clue as to what he is talking about 90% of the time.
Does anyone or everyone here honestly believe this UNSWAG (unscientific wild assed guess) baseless decisi0n to overhaul the majority of the federal bureaucracy over night firing thousands will go off without a hitch? Talk about positive thinking. For the love of Dog did anyone buy a lottery ticket?
Anyone been paying any attention to the news being generated by the most recent release of JFK assassination documents?
Mean while the genocide continues.
I’m out.
Maybe Trumps wants everyone to run to Crypto so he can sell his coins. Just another Merch scheme.
anyone who knows how it went down in Chile, Argentina, Russia under Yeltsin, and a bunch of other places should see this for what it is: a deliberate attempt to sack the US economy. the rich will reap windfall profits (like 2008)\. The oligarchs hope that everyone else will be shocked and awed into a state in which the Trump regime can consolidate power. it’s right out of Naomi Kleins Shock Doctrine. Trump didn’t think this up, the CIA and Milton Friedman did.
Addendum: the Trumpers are too stupid to think this kind of thing up, but Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller are pretty well versed in fascism. They know how this stuff is done.
All of this will be part of realizing that the empire of the “West” is passing–“into the dustbin of history” and all that.
I doubt that this is just a matter of fragile ruling egos. It probably means a restructuring of all the business that runs on bribes and “protection.” And that’s who runs the governments, rain or shine.
We are probably a long way from wisdom.
Sachs writes that “America … is spending more than it earns.”
As a nation that issues its own currency federal government finances are not dependent upon tax revenue.
Such a statement merely serves to reinforce and advocate for the continuation of neoliberal economics, and all that that entails: inequality and destruction.
We should not ignore the effect of the dollar being the reserve currency. This has resulted in an over valued currency which made it easier to import rather then manufacture here. We balanced this trade deficit by selling our treasures. We need to rebuild our domestic industries and reduce deficits. This will bring back good jobs and reduce the financial industry. Tariffs should help.
Even assuming that some sectors of the working class will get pay boosts from the tariff fiasco, what Trump (as representative of the super-rich ruling class) is doing is: instead of robbing Peter to pay Paul, he’s bribing Peter so he won’t mind if Trump ruins Paul. And guess what, Peter. You’re next.
I don’t understand much of economics, but what I gather from this article is that Trump taxes the rest of the world instead of taxing the wealthy Americans.
???
I almost hope that the tariffs are as mindless and uninformed as presented here, but I wonder (worry, fear) that the attack on the poor and vulnerable is more intended than an accidental consequence of poor judgment. There are more ‘revolutionary’ forces at work in the world today than ever in history: peak resources, changing population dynamics, digital technologies reaching competitive levels with human minds, robotics, destructive capabilities of weapons, perturbation of environmental systems….all impinging on deeply fragile human economic and social systems. I just can’t believe that the sociopathy that has come to dominate worldwide political processes isn’t aware of these forces and responding to them.
A discouraged, poverty stricken, politically manufactured and manipulated population is much easier to control. That’s the goal…
A few Oligarchs on one side, and many peasants on the other. “You will have nothing and be happy”, quote from Klas Schwab at Davos.
Bushrod Lake reveals the Truth: 60% of the American population is ILLITERATE: that ignorance extends in their total lack of understanding Economics, Politician’s corrupt gamesmanship and HOW the Super Wealthy became obscenely wealthy. No amount of Protests in the US will blunt the power of the wealthy.
You could put together Lenin, Stalin, and French Rebels of the past, and the US Oligarchs would still win.
It’s time to think about leaving the US. Pack our bags, and day “Adieu” to this godforsaken land.
It’s fascinating that Sachs fails to mention one word about how Wall St vultures essentially forced the Fortune 500 to offshore manufacturing, thereby driving up the trade deficit. (Sachs was a former Harvard boy himself who played a hand in “reforming” some former communist nations c. 1991.)
Some (some) of these tariffs could be beneficial to tens of thousands of workers in the manufacturing sector. There’s a reason some labor unions are very supportive.
Yes, Trump blaming the rest of the world is indeed absurd, as it was the American born transnational corporations and Wall St sharks who are the culprits.
ANY form of nationalism frightens certain elites. We have to get over this. Our country developed early on by implementing tariffs.
“ Some (some) of these tariffs could be beneficial to tens of thousands of workers in the manufacturing sector. There’s a reason some labor unions are very supportive.”
This is actually a very frightening sentiment! Presenting examples of one segment of society benefiting from the harm to other segments is too easy…and can dip quickly into some truly terrible examples. (Though, not saying it isn’t true.)
A gigantic segment of society was harmed massively for the past 40 years: the heartland manufacturing sector. The deaths of despair have been extraordinary. That’s what’s very frightening.
If Wall St bloodsuckers and parasitic investment bankers suffer a bit, so be it. They’ve made out like bandits, looting the country and plundering the treasury.
The tariffs Trump has imposed are on average half of the tariffs already imposed on the US by the nations tariffed.
Let that sink in!
The US since WW2 has had 100% open markets and few trade barriers, but the other nations of the world have not. Instead, they have kept protectionist economic policies and played a game of mercantilism with the US.
Supported by American Corporations who earned big profits at the expense of American workers by offshoring their jobs.
One-sided “free trade” has been absolutely crippling for the US workers.
America has carried globalism on its back for 80-years now at a tremendous cost to the American taxpayers.
With the US having the biggest national debt in the history of the world.
The current debt, deindustrialization, dependence on other countries for products, and the abuse of America by other nations’ protectionary trade is an existential threat to the survival of America. (In much the same way as Putin and Russia see the expansion of NATO and the EU as an existential threat to the survival of Russia.)
Trump knows something has to be done about this.
If you can’t beat em, join em. Any ideas for a better way?
Exactly Drew! As expected, the financial elite were alll-for offshoring because they could negate unions and OSHA regulations, which resulted in big cost-savings and hence big profits. Too many of our fellow citizens equate ’cheap’ with. ‘Good’, and didn’t want to pay 5 or 10% more for domestic/union made goods, and we’ve ended up with a ‘cheap culture’ as a result.
That was one complaint I have with Prof. Sachs otherwise good article. How does he propose to increase union membership when manufacturers can easily leave the US, and the non-trades service industry is based on cheap labor?
There are (at least) two Americas — the nation and the empire. Those who have benefited from the latter (a wealthy minority) have done so at the expense of the former (the vast bulk of the citizenry).
The empire is collapsing. Who will miss it?
The oft repeated claim that Jeffrey Sachs was one of the guys who trashed the Russian economy after the breakup of the Soviet Union is a myth. Sachs was a consultant to some eastern European countries, but he was not involved in ramming neoliberalism down their throats.
Disappointed in Jeffrey Sache’s overly simplisti5c analysis . While he is clear,-headed and to be applauded for taking the ” moral high-ground* with regard to the Gaza genocide and Ukranian fiasco, he reveals here his fundamentally Harvard-trained, Globalist,anti- nationalist economic perspective .
Nobody has forced the businesses to offshore, Drew, they followed what businesses have always done – boost productivity, make either the same output at lower input costs, or maintain the same input costs but produce a higher output, China’s opening for foreign investment after the death of Mao offered an opportunity for the former to kick in massively what with their cost of labour and energy being very much lower than those in the West, that was what has been driving companies to offshore to China, the move was further helped by containerisation which made transportation costs between the Middle Kingdom and the US negligible.
Economically, each of us perform the role of a consumer as well as a producer in life, for the former the benefits of offshoring were hugely positive in the West, not so for those that lost their jobs because of the hollowing of the Western manufacture.
What the governments should have done is to cream off some of the increase in profits of the corporates that moved to China, ring fence the money then used it either to facilitate an earlier retirement or to carry out retraining of the younger ones. That hasn’t happened, hence the election of Trump.
For much too long most of the world has spent time genuflecting to America and now…we don’t know how to stand on our own 2 feet any longer. :-( , widely exposed to what ever America wants to inflict upon us. But in the end, whenever it comes, America will go down the same path it is taking us.