With an eye on a major climate gathering in November, Marcy Winograd says a veterans’ group wants the White House to apologize for the way Pelosi unnecessarily escalated tension in the Asia Pacific.
By Marcy Winograd
Less than 100 days before the world’s leaders meet in Egypt to tackle the climate crisis, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s incendiary trip to Taiwan leaves climate cooperation between the U.S. and China in tatters.
It was only last year, in 2021, that U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry and China Special Envoy for Climate Change Xie Zhenhua issued a joint statement to strengthen the Paris Agreement by adopting “long-term strategies aimed at net zero GHG emissions” to keep the world’s temperature below 2 degrees Celsius, with the goal to limit warming to 1.5 degrees.
Such collaboration is urgently needed if the world is to thwart rising sea levels, drought, famine and extreme weather — flash floods to suffocating heat waves — because China and the United States are the world’s largest carbon emitters, responsible for 40 percent of greenhouse gasses baking the earth.
Following Pelosi’s Taipei jaunt by U.S. military transport, including polluting fighter jets and warships that escorted the speaker to Taiwan, Beijing broke off climate talks and launched large scale military drills, encircling Taiwan to prove it could blockade the island and that if push came to shove — should a confrontation ignite between Chinese warships and the U.S. Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group stationed in the South China Sea — everyone would know the score before the first rocket was launched.
With the 27th Conference of the Parties (COP-27) slated to address the preservation of biodiversity and the need for decarbonization and capital to create sustainable cities, it would be a travesty for the U.S. and China to remain ecologically estranged, stalled indefinitely on climate talks.
Veterans for Peace’s Climate Crisis and Militarism Project (CCMP) (of which this writer is a member) has issued a statement requesting the U.S. government apologize to China for the speaker’s visit.
“We call on the White House and State Department to apologize to China for unnecessarily escalating tension in the Asia Pacific,” the group said, adding that it is in this region that the “U.S. maintains over 200 military bases, stations tens of thousands of troops and conducts hundreds of military exercises to prepare for war against China.”
Such an apology would not be unprecedented. The U.S. government has issued, either from the president or Congress, formal apologies for slavery and Jim Crow laws, Japanese internment and the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii.
While New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman described Pelosi’s trip as “utterly reckless, irresponsible and dangerous,” some lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, argued the speaker had a right to travel wherever she pleased and that the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which the United States has formally recognized for the last 50 years as the only legitimate China, had no business telling the speaker where she could or could not take her entourage.
This argument assumes the speaker was not a heartbeat away from the presidency, second in line to assume the role of commander in chief in charge of hundreds of military bases surrounding China; did not have a history of anti-Chinese rhetoric and legislation and was merely a tourist zipping around Asia in a commercial jet or a less powerful politician bent on attending a ribbon cutting event at a cultural center in Taipei.
Anti-war organizations, such as Veterans for Peace, CODEPINK, Pivot to Peace and the foreign policy team of Progressive Democrats of America knew better, so they sponsored a protest (video here) complete with ornamental yellow Chinese dragons in front of Pelosi’s office at the San Francisco Federal Building on the eve of her visit to Taiwan. The message? Cancel your trip. Waving signs that read “No war on China” and “Stop the provocations” the demonstrators — most of them Chinese Americans — urged Pelosi to focus instead on the climate crisis and economic woes besetting the country.
In Congresswoman Pelosi’s 12th congressional district, which spans most of San Francisco, the Asian population is 37 percent, the poverty rate 10 percent, leaving over 80,000 people in dire straits. One-in-four people living in San Francisco risk food insecurity, not knowing from where their next meal will come. This stands in marked contrast to the speaker’s fridge packed with gourmet ice cream, her net worth pegged at $114-million, according to Open Secrets, a D.C.-based non-profit that follows the money — campaign contributions.
Pelosi ignored the protest in her hometown; President Joe Biden’s stated disapproval; the Pentagon’s concern that forcing a confrontation with a nuclear-armed country — holder of a trillion dollars of U.S. debt, world’s largest exporter, population of 1.5 billion people — might not serve the interests of US national security.
She flew to Taiwan anyway.
Accompanied by Congress members Gregory Meeks (D-NY-05), Chair, House Foreign Affairs Committee; as well as Mark Takano (D-CA-41); Suzan DelBene (D-WA-01); Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-ILL-8th) and Andy Kim (D-NJ-03) the speaker, whose husband was only days before heavily invested in the microchip sector, lunched with semiconductor magnates in the microchip mecca of Taiwan. This lunch occurred a week before Biden signed the Chips Act of 2022 to legislate a $52 billion subsidy to the domestic microchips industry to prevent U.S. companies from offshoring foundries to China, another microchip mecca.
[Related: Big Chip in US-China Crisis]
Pelosi’s itinerary also included a visit the National Human Rights Museum, where amid protests and counter-protests she met with former PRC political prisoners and learned of the archives documenting the persecution of dissidents and murder of civilians by anti-communists who fled the Chinese mainland in 1949 when Mao Zedong founded the People’s Republic of China.
The Chinese government said Pelosi’s visit “gravely undermines China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” and in the hours following conducted days of live-fire military exercises in the contested Taiwan Strait, imposed sanctions on Pelosi, suspended dialogue on “theater level” military commanders” and cut off climate talks. Pelosi rubbed salt into the wound — insisting the trip was “worth it” and that China’s President Xi Jinping was “acting like a scared bully.”
In the face of Pelosi’s own bullying taunts and in the absence of a U.S. government apology, grassroots diplomats can work to foster friendships with the Chinese people.
Establish a Green Sister City
Launched by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956, the Sister Cities program was designed to promote people-to-people diplomacy through cultural exchanges and shared research. Beijing and New York City are Sister Cities, as are Washington, D.C., and Chongqing. Ironically, it was San Francisco, the city Pelosi is supposed to represent, that in 1980 became the first U.S. city to form a friendship link with a city in the People’s Republic of China. Shanghai is now also a Sister City to Chicago.
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Sister City relationships between the U.S. and Russia struggle on life support. Several cities — Colorado Springs, Sarasota, Norfolk, Dallas, DesMoines and Chicago — have already severed or are in the process of dissolving their Sister City relationships with counterparts in Russia.
In keeping with the emphasis on research and development, U.S. and China Sister Cities could collaborate on building sustainable cities, technology and expertise to create networks of bike lanes and mass transit; tree canopies in scorched neighborhoods; urban farming; innovation in sewage treatment and waste utilization; divestment from coal and oil to transition to renewable energy and reliance on passive solar.
So, while Pelosi defends her Taiwan trip — insisting the Pentagon never told her not to go —peace-loving people in the United States can pursue real diplomacy: Sister City relationships that not only heal the spirit, but also the climate.
Marcy Winograd is coordinator of CODEPINK CONGRESS, a bimonthly program on U.S. foreign policy and demilitarization. A long-time anti-war activist, Marcy served as a 2020 DNC delegate to Bernie Sanders and co-chairs the foreign policy team for Progressive Democrats of America. A member of Veterans for Peace’s Climate Crisis and Militarism Project, Marcy’s activism began in high school when she marched against the Vietnam War and later joined the defense team of Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg. A retired English and government teacher, Marcy blogs about militarism and foreign policy.
The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
Que Washington vive avec sa démence, mais qu’il n’oblige pas les autres à adopter cette démence.
China’s leaders are rational people, mostly engineers, able to do cost-enefit analyses, etc. I don’t think any of them count on the Rapture to solve Global Warming, e.g. US leaers?Hmmm….
Pelosi doesn’t care, she is in her eighties and doesn’t have to face much future with the consequences of climate change. She’s just doing what the military-industrial complex tells her to do.
China collects points for letting U.S. leadership (?) make absolute fools of themselves, repeatedly.
… btw: Her husband is also an International Banker.
… And, the last time I checked in 2013, she made $13 M off of her NFL investment, alone…
… and btw: LBJ had another war in 68.
… It was called the war on Poverty. I think that Frank Church was working on that one. Frank, also worked the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act. It did not last long, before it was torn to shreds, but it maybe the last truly American law that came out of D.C..
But, in 1970 the minimum wage was $1.95. And, the cost of a home was about $23,000.
… With the minimal inflation in those days, and using the given “round numbers”, the house could be paid off in 12 years.
But, with today, D.C. mandates $7.65 an hour. And, the average cost of a house in the US is $500,000.
… So today, (… btw: that’s with the exhoritant hyper-inflation…), it would take 38.4 years to pay off the same house.
… So with paying no taxes, no interest, no food, etc., the banker is now at 38.4 years to own the home, vs the 12 years…
When is last time we saw that War On Poverty? … What has happened to War Of Management vs the Hourly Worker??
… Nancy, keep eating your Jeni’s ice cream…
… “investor” is, what the “”investor””does …
Off the top I wonder, given the mordant state of relations between sister cities in US and Russia, what chances of those cities being amenable the prospect of establishing such relations with China, whom the US is pushing toward war.
One hopes that we Americans do not succumb to the coming onslaught of anti-China propaganda, which I believe has a deeply racist root. The thought of our government getting us to consent, out of patriotism and national security, to the killing of innocent Chinese men, women and children is sickening.
Such an attitude could soon land you in trouble in the UK. Rishi Sunak, who may replace Boris Johnson as Prime Minister, has promised to expand the ‘Prevent’ program, supposedly aimed at extremists, to include those who ‘vilify’ Great Britain. I guess in time of war, or the build-up to one, feeling sickened by the prospect would qualify.
If that law was implemented in the States, it would declare most journalists that post in consortium news as criminals. As is, British parliament is crimnalizing independent journalists who post from Donbas area with a counter narrative. Graham Phillips is an example. hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Blzn-ncfQ8&t=524s
Interesting surmise, and is that why Pelosi is so anti-China? She embodies the truism “familiarity breeds contempt” ? Doesn’t like it she has to represent “those people”?
I recall during Obama’s admin. that both he and Pelosi both reserved their harshest scorn and disdain for any person or group that represented real progressive change and accounting. Like all the groups mentioned above who would resist her magical mystery tour.
The US and China both know what needs doing about climate change: stop emitting greenhouse gases, and start drawing down some of the CO2 already in the atmosphere. Cooperation between the two nations on this would be nice, but lack of such cooperation is no excuse for either to continue supporting global warming.
The US doesn’t do collaboration anyway. It’s the Zero-Sum Nation, which is to say that the sum of its efforts to protect the environment and impede climate change is zero. The Chinese don’t think that way so — why bother.? For the US, the Climate is just another big Fail. hxxps://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/china-wins-the-us-loses