COP26: Draft Communique Ripped as ‘Polite Request’

“This draft deal is not a plan to solve the climate crisis, it’s an agreement that we’ll all cross our fingers and hope for the best,” Greenpeace International said. 

At the COP26 conference in Glasgow. (IAEA Imagebank/Wikimedia Commons)

By Jake Johnson
Common Dreams

A new COP26 draft decision text unveiled Wednesday was roundly panned by climate campaigners as badly inadequate to the task of slashing global greenhouse gas emissions, which are pushing the planet toward a catastrophic 2.4°C of warming by the end of the century.

“This draft deal is not a plan to solve the climate crisis, it’s an agreement that we’ll all cross our fingers and hope for the best,” Jennifer Morgan, executive director of Greenpeace International, said in response to the fresh document, the details of which world leaders are set to hash out in the final days of the pivotal summit in Glasgow, Scotland.

Far from a concrete and ambitious plan to transition away from fossil fuel use in line with increasingly dire scientific projections, Morgan argued that the new draft text amounts to a “polite request that countries maybe, possibly, do more next year.”

“Well that’s not good enough, and the negotiators shouldn’t even think about leaving this city until they’ve agreed to a deal that meets the moment. Because most assuredly, this one does not,” said Morgan. “The text needs to be much stronger on finance and adaptation and needs to include real numbers in the hundreds of billions, with a delivery plan for richer countries to support less-developed nations.”

“And we need to see a deal that commits countries to coming back every year with new and better plans until together they get us over the bar and we can stay below 1.5°C of warming,” she continued. “And while the text calls for an accelerated phase-out of coal and fossil fuel subsidies, wreckers like the Saudi and Australian governments will be working to gut that part before this conference closes. Ministers now have three days to turn this around and get the job done.”

The draft text calls on countries to toughen their pledges to cut carbon pollution, urging them to “revisit and strengthen the 2030 targets in their nationally determined contributions, as necessary to align with the Paris Agreement temperature goal by the end of 2022.”

But as it stands, the seven-page document is light on specifics and binding commitments, pressing countries to “accelerate the phasing-out of coal and subsidies for fossil fuels” without offering a timeline and vaguely nodding toward “the urgency of making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions.”

Cansim Leylim of pointed out that “this the first time fossil fuels are named in 25 years of U.N. climate negotiations, and that is a huge testament to the people power and grassroots actions that have pushed continuously for the end of fossil fuels.”

“But ending just coal is not enough,” Leylim said. “All fossil fuels need to be phased out. By focusing only on coal, we risk creating a dynamic in which poor countries with coal infrastructure are punished while rich countries with more fossil gas in their energy mix are rewarded. Fossil fuels need to go all together.”

As Reuters reported, the draft “asks countries to submit improved pledges next year, but does not confirm if this will become an annual requirement—potentially leaving a decision on future reviews to Egypt, which will host the next U.N. climate conference.”

“The draft’s call to halt subsidies for fossil fuels is also likely to face pushback from big producers,” Reuters added. Fossil fuel lobbyists have a larger presence at COP26 than any single country, according to an analysis released earlier this week by the humanitarian group Global Witness.

The COP26 draft was released just hours after new research from climate policy experts warned that even if countries meet their current pledges—including those made thus far in Glasgow—”global greenhouse gas emissions in 2030 will still be around twice as high as necessary for the 1.5°C limit.”

“With 2030 pledges alone—without longer-term targets—global temperature increase will be at 2.4°C in 2100,” the experts behind the Climate Action Tracker (CAT) found. “The projected warming from current policies (not proposals)—what countries are actually doing—is even higher, at 2.7°C with only a 0.2°C improvement over the last year and nearly one degree above the net-zero announcements governments have made.”

Pointing to the new CAT study, Morgan of Greenpeace International noted that the central task of COP26 was to craft climate policies to limit warming to 1.5°C by the end of the century, the more ambitious goal of the Paris Agreement.

If the new COP26 draft text “is the best [world leaders] can come up with,” said Morgan, “then it’s no wonder kids today are furious at them.”

This article is from Common Dreams.

2 comments for “COP26: Draft Communique Ripped as ‘Polite Request’

  1. mgr
    November 11, 2021 at 09:03

    As Greta Thunberg accurately declared at COP24, “We have not come here to beg the world’s leaders to care for our future. They have ignored us in the past and they will ignore us again. We have come here to tell them that change is coming whether they like it or not.”

    Well, if we had any doubt about the fecklessness of the “leaders” of the world’s developed nations in the face of our climate emergency (and their self interest) that should now be dispelled. Any meaningful change was always going to come from the streets and in particular the youth. It was never going to be rationally embraced and acted on by these “leaders” but forced upon them, kicking and screaming. Perhaps the most practical plan of all is to shove them aside.

    It’s now up to the youth of the world. My hope is that they will awaken to the most powerful weapon they have to force the changes required. The power to organize and to boycott. Boycott, boycott and boycott some more. Our continued patronage to the companies and entities that have opted for short term profit for a few rather than a future for all is what gives them the power to obstruct meaningful change. Remove the support and take away their power. After all, they are full blown barking mad.

    • Lois Gagnon
      November 12, 2021 at 13:25

      Well said. And WTH are fossil fuel lobbyists doing there anyway? Were they invited by the governments tasked with meeting the necessary targets to avoid catastrophe? Our leaders are nothing but court jesters to the ruling oligarchs. The kids see this charade for what it is.

Comments are closed.