Fort Hood a Dangerous Place for Women in the Military

The family of murdered Army Specialist Vanessa Guillen has accused the Army of a cover-up in her disappearance and are calling for a congressional investigation, Ann Wright reports.

Vice President Mike Pence visits service members and veterans Oct. 29, 2019, at the U.S. Army Base in Fort Hood, Texas. (White House, D. Myles Cullen)

By Ann Wright
Code Pink

Fort Hood, Texas, is a dangerous place for women in the military. The murder of Army Specialist (SPC) Vanessa Guillen is the latest tragic evidence of the violence there and other U.S. military bases. 

Violence against women in the military and at Fort Hood has been going on for a very long time. Twelve years ago, in 2008, I wrote an article “Is There an Army Cover Up of Rape and Murder of Women Soldiers?” that detailed violence against women assigned to units from Fort Hood that were then located in Iraq.  

Eight female soldiers from Fort Hood, six from the Fourth Infantry Division and two from the 1st Armored Cavalry Division, had died of “non-combat related injuries” at Camp Taji, Iraq. Two had been raped immediately before their deaths and another raped prior to arriving in Iraq. Two women from Fort Hood had died of suspicious “non-combat related injuries” on Balad base, Iraq, and one was raped before she died. Four deaths of women assigned to units from Fort Hood had been classified as “suicides,” and families of some of those women disagreed with Fort Hood’s findings. 

Now, 12 years later, the Army’s handling of the investigation into SPC Guillen’s disappearance is an affront to Guillen’s family and to military women on Fort Hood. 

For three months the perpetrator of Guillen’s murder roamed free on Fort Hood, capable of murdering other young women and showing such impunity that, according to Guillen’s sister Mayra, who had met him during one of her visits to Fort Hood, “he laughed in my face.  I had a very uneasy feeling about him.”  

She should have felt uneasy as she was face-to-face to her sister’s brazen murderer who had killed her sister with a hammer in his workplace, dismembered her, attempted to burn her body before burying body parts in three holes covered with concrete on a highway embankment thirty miles from Fort Hood.

Not Forthcoming

Guillen’s family was relentless in attempting to get information from Fort Hood leadership about what happened to her but to no avail. They held press conferences, enlisted the aid of organizations that offered a reward for information that would assist in finding Guillen, called on the Texas congressional delegation for help but the Army was not forthcoming with information that led them to believe that a meaningful investigation into her disappearance was happening.  

It wasn’t until 10 weeks, after an intervention by U.S. Congresswoman Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-Tex.)  and numerous emotional press conferences by the family, that the family’s lawyer Natalie Khawam finally was briefed by phone for four hours on July 1 by Fort Hood’s Criminal Investigative Division (CID) and told that Guillen’s blood had been found in a neighboring unit’s weapons armory where she had gone on a day off to deliver paperwork on a weapon to a person who should have been an immediate “person of interest” in her disappearance.   

Since April 22, when Vanessa Guillen was last seen alive, her disappearance and lack of information from Fort Hood to the family have led to questions of a cover-up.  The family suspected that foul play was involved but was getting no information from CID. They were told that providing the family with any information about the progress of the investigation would “compromise the integrity of the investigation.”  

Her disappearance and the lack of information about the Army’s investigation resulted in statements from other female soldiers who have gone public with their experiences of sexual harassment and assault in the military and many  hashtags on social media to remind the public that Vanessa was missing and the family was getting no information from Fort Hood leadership. 

Guillen’s family had been telling Fort Hood authorities and the public that Vanessa had been the target of sexual harassment prior to her disappearance. She told her mother, her friends and some fellow service members about the harassment. The family’s lawyer, Khawan, said Guillen, fearing retaliation, never filed a formal complaint on base.  

Khawam alleged on July 1 that the suspect, who the Army said had killed himself earlier that same day, was the same man who harassed Guillen. 

Khawan gave details that Aaron Robinson watched her take a shower in a locker room. “She was taking a shower and he walked in on her and sat down. She was creeped out — as one would be.”  

Khawam explained during an interview on Democracy Now  on July 2:

“The person that was harassing her, this Aaron Robinson, this was her sergeant (Note-Robinson was not a sergeant, nor in her chain of command.  He was a specialist in a different unit and worked in a comparable position in his unit’s weapons room.) And he had — she was taking a shower one time, and she was in the women’s locker room, and he walked in and sat down and watched her while she was showering. She saw him, and she said, ‘Please leave. This makes me very uncomfortable.’ “

Khawam also said,

“She didn’t know how to report the incident to military authorities. She told her family and told her friends and other soldiers on base. When they asked, ‘Why don’t you report it to your commander or sergeants?,’  she just said that it wouldn’t work. She was afraid to report it, because she was afraid to lose her job. They would demote her. And she knew of other instances where they did not take those reports seriously, and that would make her life more difficult on the base.”

The family believes there are others involved in Vanessa’s disappearance and murder.

Vanessa’s family has accused the Army of a cover-up in her disappearance and they want a congressional investigation and legislation to change Army policies.

The family’s lawyer accused the Army of “lying, being disingenuous” in its treatment of Guillen’s family about the disappearance and murder of Guillen. “They lied to us from day one.”

Vanessa’s family drove from Houston to Washington, D.C., to participate in a press conference on July 1 with Khawam and U.S. Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who is a major in the U.S. Army Reserves.  Family members and attorney Khawan stated during the press conference that the Army had been telling the families “lies.”  

The attention from the press conference forced the Fort Hood command to respond with a four-hour briefing to Khawan, the Guillen family’s attorney; a briefing that should have happened weeks before.

Guillen’s Body Found, Suspect Commits Suicide

Other events began unfolding rapidly on June 30 and July 1 that caused the Army to have to give details of the investigation to the family. 

First, about 1 pm on June 30, CID was notified that contractors working on a fence adjacent to the Leon River in Belton, Texas, discovered what appeared to be human remains. USACID, along with the FBI, U.S. Marshals Service, County Sheriff’s Office, and Texas Rangers searched the area and identified scattered human remains that appeared to have been placed into a concrete-like substance and buried.

Secondly, about 8:30 pm on June 30 — more than three months and one week after Guillen’s disappearance —SPC Robinson’s girlfriend Cecily Aguilar was interviewed again and admitted that SPC Robinson told her that on April 22, he struck a female soldier in the head with a hammer multiple times at his arms room, killing her on Fort Hood.

SPC Robinson then placed her in a box and moved the box to a location near the Leon River in Belton, Texas. Aguilar who had been interviewed earlier by CID, was finally convinced by CID to talk by phone to Robinson in which they recorded his comments about killing Guillen, dismembering, and burying her body.

Thirdly, on the evening of June 30, Aguilar assisted law enforcement in locating Robinson, who was on foot in Killeen, Texas after he left his barracks. Robinson was approached by law enforcement at 1:17 am on July 1, 2020.  Law enforcement officials said he shot himself in the head with a pistol, killing himself.

By the next day, July 1, those two developments — the discovery of human remains along a highway 30 miles from Fort Hood on June 30 and Robinson’s suicide in the early morning hours of July 1 — left the Army with no choices but to reveal what they had learned over the three-month investigation but had refused to tell the family.

“We believe that her remains were found. We believe that the suspect killed himself in the morning. And that, unfortunately, doesn’t provide us any information about how this happened [or] why a beautiful young soldier is not with us today,” Khawam, said July 1 during the Washington news conference. Later that day,  Khawam was finally briefed by Army investigators about what had happened.

Ann Wright served 29 years in the U.S. Army/Army Reserves and retired as a colonel.   She was a U.S. diplomat for 16 years and served in U.S. Embassies in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Micronesia, Afghanistan and Mongolia.  She resigned from the U.S. government in March 2003 in opposition to President George W. Bush’s war on Iraq. She is co-author of “Dissent: Voices of Conscience.”

An earlier version of this article was published by CodePink.

Please Contribute to Consortium
News on its 25th Anniversary 

Donate securely with PayPal here

Or securely by credit card or check by clicking the red button:


10 comments for “Fort Hood a Dangerous Place for Women in the Military

  1. Chumpsky
    July 14, 2020 at 18:56

    It is very saddening to hear of yet another tragedy within the military and the typical stonewalling by top brass to do a proper investigation to bring the culprit(s) to justice. One can rightfully conclude by the numbers that at Ft. Hood the tragedy of these women soldiers was in some shape of form already established. A systemic pattern — first starting with sexual abuse leading to the inevitable murder to keep the victim from talking and bringing such abuse to the attention of the public — shows that culpability leads right up to the commanding officer(s).

    The church and the military are two of the easiest institutions for psychopaths and perverts to hide as there is little accountability and even less internal desire to change within. Sadly, in both, the A and B teams are firmly entrenched to dehumanize persons to be just pieces of sexual or physical meat for exploitation by the powers that be.

    Our society, as a whole, has allowed for mission creep to be acceptable, and that’s how ‘interventionism’ became the paradigm for implementing ‘defense’. Abuse of one’s own (lowest ranking) isn’t far from abuse of others (the so-called enemy, esp. the disenfranchised or one of different culture and values). We’ve rationalized such horrific domestic and international behaviors through things like claiming ‘exceptionalism’. I wonder if and when this insanity will ever end, and how many more cases of abuse and senseless deaths there will be at the hands of those we are told to trust.

  2. lexx
    July 14, 2020 at 18:32

    was the family ever questiond about the disappearance (AWOL)of Vanessa Guillen
    by the army?
    if not that is proof of a coverup

  3. Sam F
    July 13, 2020 at 21:09

    The tragedy of Guillen seems to be a microcosm of the tragedy of US interventionism, always pretending a good motive, but always facilitated by power sought and motivated only by self-interest. No doubt a hundred innocents are raped and a thousand slain for every US casualty in its selfish interventions. We should understand that US interventions are rapes and murders for personal gratification and nothing more. Our oligarchy ascends because it desires and masters the power of rape and murder in all forms, and that is all it seeks everywhere.

  4. rosemerry
    July 13, 2020 at 16:47

    So we are supposed to believe that the huge numbers of these “protectors of our freedom” somehow add to our national security. The spending on arms, military “intelligence”, sanctioning, attacking, invading other countries, threatening others, interfering with foreign policy even of our allies enables us to make plenty of enemies so we can pretend we are in existential danger and protected from danger by our violence.

    A tiny new virus has shown our vulnerability, but we still do not notice that the whole “defense” system is useless.

    • Sam F
      July 13, 2020 at 21:26

      Yes, the Covid virus the US would rather join than fight symbolizes the virus of their greed in false defenses.

  5. Truth first
    July 13, 2020 at 14:03

    Hey women and men. The American military has been a very negative force globally and in America. In spite of the propaganda that so many Americans buy into this world and this country would be far better off without the US military.
    The answer is simple, don’t join the US military and become part of this vast killing machine. The life you save could be your own!!

    • Michael Cosenza
      July 14, 2020 at 04:18

      I have a better idea. Reinstate the military draft so that all the people of the US have a stake in what our government is doing with OUR military. I would suggest a draft of ALL individuals over the age of 18 giving them the option of joining the military or supervised alternative community service of some sort. The biggest mistake we as a country made at the close of the Vietnam War was to eliminate the military draft in hopes of improving our military. It has worked in reverse instead turning former civilian soldiers into mercenaries no longer responsible to the American people. I speak from experience as a Vietnam veteran who remained in the US military for 20 years and witnessed the transformation of our citizen soldier into a mercenary force no longer answerable to the American people.

    • July 14, 2020 at 13:09

      That’s right. It’s baffling that people are still joining the military. I know they’re young and dumb in many cases but to sign up to kill and oppress other humans for a paycheck is indefensible. And for women, it’s downright idiocy.

  6. July 13, 2020 at 09:57

    I’ve always felt that the military has a special appeal for psychopaths and sadists and other highly disturbed people.

    After all, no matter what the government propaganda says, war is almost by definition a free-for-all of horrors – an opening of the gates of hell for playtime.

    I do not believe a serious effort is made to exclude the disturbed types – as with testing – because they have always been valued in war.

    And America is almost continuously at war.

    Surely, we saw enough horrors in Vietnam, in Iraq, and in other places to understand there are lots of them in the American military.

    The military should never have a central place in any society. It is by its nature anti-democratic and authoritarian, but it is also committed to violence.

    You need a military for defense, but it should be kept minimal. America’s Frankenstein military hasn’t fought a war of defense since WWII. That does impart certain values, very unhealthy values.

    The bigger the role the military plays in any society, the less healthy that society is.

    And they play a huge role in American society.

    • Sam F
      July 13, 2020 at 21:33

      Yes, the addiction to abuse of power is now a disease throughout US government and its mass media culture,

Comments are closed.