Come Free Me

It is no surprise that young people are on the streets with banners that plead for a new world, for it is these young people who recognize that their lives are at stake, writes Vijay Prashad.

Gao Liang, The People Who Got Land, June 1948.
By Vijay Prashad

 Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research
As we enter the new year, protests across the planet continue unabated; rising levels of discontent are manifest in both progressive and reactionary directions. The political character of the anger might whip across the spectrum of opinion and hope, but the underlying frustrations are similar. There is anger at the decades-long crisis of capitalism, and anger at the consequences of austerity. Some of that anger is directed towards hope for a world without inequality and without catastrophe; some of that anger deepens into a toxic hatred of other people.

Toxic anger whips against immigrants and minorities, festering hate as a false hope against austerity. Genuine hope is to be found in the plea for a new system to better organize our common resources to end hunger and dispossession and to manage the great catastrophes of capitalism and climate change.

No surprise that young people are on the streets with banners that plead for a new world, for it is these young people who recognize that their lives are at stake, that the class realities of property and privilege are shutting the doors on their aspirations (a new UN report on Chile says that socio-economic inequality is the main grievance of the protestors). This is not a youth uprising without a class character; these young people know that they will not be able to easily access housing and work, joy and fulfillment.

André Fougeron, Civilisation atlantique, 1953.
The rational kernel of genuine hope points its fingers at obscene social inequality. Each year, the financial news service Bloomberg produces its Billionaires Index. This year’s index, which was published in the last days of 2019, shows that the world’s top 500 billionaires increased their wealth by $1.2 trillion; their wealth is now at $5.9 trillion, up by 25 percent. The largest number – 172 – of these 500 billionaires live in the United States. They added $500 billion to their fortunes; this includes Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, who added $27.3 billion and Microsoft’s Bill Gates, who added $22.7 billion. Eight of the ten richest people on the planet are U.S. nationals (from Jeff Bezos to Julia Koch).

Such reports do not explain anything; they merely offer us a window into Richistan – the country of the very wealthy. But a deeper look into these numbers provides an understanding of the essence of social inequality. The Walton family, who own the global retail giant Walmart, is well-represented in the Bloomberg list of billionaires. This family appropriates $70,000 per minute, which amounts to $100 million per day.

This is the lion’s share of Walmart’s earnings. A comparison between the share of Walmart’s earnings that is seized by the Walton family and the share left to the Walmart workers is instructive. Walmart’s own Economic, Social, and Governance Report (2019) admits that the average wage for Walmart workers in the United States is $14.26 per hour. If the average Walmart employee (2.2 million of them globally) worked for 40 hours a week for 52 weeks, the employee would earn $29,660 annually – what the Walton family makes in twenty-five seconds. A Chinese worker who produces goods for the Walmart global value chain makes – on average – $300 per month, or $3,600 annually – what the Walton family makes in three seconds.

The wealth of the Walton family is a direct consequence of the social labour of the millions of workers who make the products that Walmart sells and of the millions of workers who sell these products. But they earn a fraction of the vast profit of $510 billions earned by Walmart in 2019.

Last year, in January, thousands of Bangladeshi garment workers – the majority of whom are women – began industrial action against factories that made clothes that sell in such retailers as Walmart and H&M. In retaliation for these strikes, 7,500 workers were dismissed by the owners, while thousands of workers faced criminal cases for what Human Rights Watch called ‘broad and vague’ allegations. Most of these workers earn not more than 3,000 taka a month (U.S. $30), a tenth of the wages of a Chinese worker.

When these workers – paid at enormously low wage rates – ask for modest wage increases, they face the full wrath of the owners of the small factories that produce for Walmart and of the Bangladeshi State. On 8 January 2019, Sumon Mia (age 22) and Nahid, two garment workers who were employed at Anlima Textiles walked through the protests during their lunch break. Nahid later said, ‘Police started shooting and the workers started running away. So Sumon and I started running and suddenly Sumon was shot in his chest and he fell down. I fled. Later I found Sumon’s body lying on the road’.

Bloomberg’s list should be annotated to include the other side of wealth, the garment workers in Bangladesh whose social labour is seized to produce the wealth for the Walton family. It should somehow find a place for the name Sumon Mia.

Andrew Biraj, Rahela Akhter, a Bangladeshi garment worker, resists the police, Dhaka, June 2010. Biraj is a student of Shahidul Alam, whose new book, The Tide Will Turn, is out from Steidl Books.
A World Bank report in 2019 showed that eight million Bangladeshis are no longer living under the poverty line. This report’s main point – the decrease in poverty – hides its actual findings. One in four Bangladeshis remain below the poverty line, and 13 percent of the population is living under the extreme poverty line (The Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies has an excellent analysis of the situation of poverty and the working class). The numbers are – as Sanjay Reddy and his colleagues show with regard to poverty figures – untrustworthy, since the government data on which they are based is neither reliable nor consistent.

The World Bank report shows that 90 percent of the reduction took place in rural areas, where remittances from urban workers provide a major boost. Urban garment workers send a large part of their wages to their families, while they themselves live in poverty; the  number of people living in extreme poverty in urban areas – says the World Bank – remained ‘almost unchanged’. Of those eight million who moved out of poverty, the status of 54 percent of them is ‘vulnerable’ to a return to poverty. This depends on remittances, such as from their relatives in the garment sector and from relatives who are working abroad.

The protests of the workers in Bangladesh to increase their wages to a decent standard are part of this wave of anti-austerity protests. Demonstrations not only decry cuts in government spending and the rise in prices of basic goods (public transportation) but also demand the rights of workers. These struggles that have inflamed Chile and Ecuador, Iran and India, Haiti and Lebanon, Zimbabwe and Malawi, are not just against bribery or against fuel price rises; they are against the entire framework of austerity and the harsh rate of exploitation that immiserates a greater share of humankind.

The revolutionary Bangla poet, Nazrul Islam (1899-1976), sang with indignation at this robbery:
Beton Diacho? Chup rou joto mithyabadir dal!
Koto pai diye kulider tui koto crore peli bol!
Have you paid wages? Shut up you gang of liars!
How many millions did you make for the pennies you gave the coolies!
His poem begins with a worker getting beaten by a boss. Nazrul Islam, who never let such atrocities numb him, writes with great feeling: ‘My eyes well with tears; will the weak get beaten like this all over the world?’. He hopes that this condition is not eternal, that the exploitation of humanity is not permanent. These hopes – written into poetry a century ago – remain alive today as young people sincerely, and not naively, struggle to build a new world.

But what would that world be like? Simply being against exploitation and against oppression is not sufficient. A project of vitality for a socialist future is necessary, which is precisely what we – at Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research – are attempting to develop.

Thirty years ago, the communist director, actor, and writer Safdar Hashmi was brutally killed near Delhi while the troupe of which he was a part – Jana Natya Manch – performed a play. Their play – Halla Bol (Raise Hell) – was on behalf of Ramanand Jha, the communist candidate for the Ghaziabad municipal elections. Safdar was beaten to death by gangsters of the Congress Party (LeftWord Books in Delhi has just published a wonderful new book by Sudhanva Deshpande about Safdar’s life and its meaning for all of us).

Safdar was luminous, a person of talent and affection, and of commitment to his party – the Communist Party of India (Marxist) – and to the struggle. One of his poems speaks directly to the spirit of this newsletter:
Aaj agar ye desh salamat
Hai toh mere hi bal se.
Aaj agar mai mar jaaoon toh
Griha yudh hoga kal se
Aao o Bharat desh ke veero.
Aao mujko azad karo.
Today if this country is safe,
It is because of my strength.
If I die today,
Civil war will start tomorrow.
Come, brave ones of India,
Come free me!
Free me from this oppressive present and take me to a liberated future. His poem could be written on the walls of Santiago (Chile) or of Port au Prince (Haiti) or of Lilongwe (Malawi); it could be sung in Arabic or in Swahili, in Thai or in Farsi – and its meaning would resonate. Come free me.

Vijay Prashad, an Indian historian, journalist and commentator, is the executive director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and the chief editor of Left Word Books.

This article is from Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Please Make a Winter Fund Drive Donation Today

Before commenting please read Robert Parry’s Comment Policy. Allegations unsupported by facts, gross or misleading factual errors and ad hominem attacks, and abusive or rude language toward other commenters or our writers will not be published.  If your comment does not immediately appear, please be patient as it is manually reviewed. For security reasons, please refrain from inserting links in your comments, which should not be longer than 300 words.

5 comments for “Come Free Me

  1. Red Robbo
    January 5, 2020 at 01:54

    Cratylus states: ‘ And the lives of virtually ALL have improved. I suspect if you ask the average Chinese, he or she is quite pleased with what has happened in the last 40 years.’

    The lives of the small minority who do not need to work have improved considerably during the past forty years, enormously since Mao hastened the development of capitalism in China. He stated in 1949 ‘China must utilize all the factors of urban and rural capitalism that are beneficial and not harmful to the national economy and the people’s livelihood, and we must unite with the national bourgeoisie in common struggle. Our present policy is to regulate capitalism, not to destroy it.’

    The standard of poverty has risen since those days but at what cost for the vast majority? I am sure you have not forgotten the suicides caused by factory work. By contrast, Foxcomm’s Terry Gou is doing very nicely. In an article titled ‘Always Stay Professional’. Inside China’s Booming Butler Schools, Nothing But the Best Will Do’ (Time, 1 November, 2017) we learn that some off China’s many billionaires and 1,590,000+ millionaires wish to live the life of Riley Downtown Abbey style! ‘Students pay 50,000 rmb ($7,500) for a six-week course on food presentation, how to iron shirts the proper way, and maintaining serene decorum at all times…. Students learn how to choose fine wine but also good Chinese liquor, teach tai chi, perform a tea ceremony and caddy on the golf course. For many, it’s another world.’ Indeed. ‘…15-hour days and endless drilling. How to clean a toilet, iron a tablecloth, use tape-measures and plastic blocks to get table placings perfectly aligned. It’s a regimen of burns, blisters and bottomless cups of coffee’. But perhaps such exploitation is preferable to that found in factories “To this day, most toys are made in China. They are the source of children’s dreams all over the world. However the process through which these dreams are created remains a nightmare. Countless hours of overtime, contact with dangerous chemicals and poor wages barely enough to live on are some of the biggest problems” (China Labor Watch, December 6, 2018).

  2. rosemerry
    January 3, 2020 at 12:51

    An engrossing article (perhaps that is an ill-chosen word!) I cannot understand how people so rich can bear to accept the continuing growth of their “earnings” while being so cruel and inhumane to those who work for them. It is distressing to read of conditions not only in Bangladesh or China, but all over the “developed” world-even here in France the employees of Amazon have shown the deplorable conditions of their work and pay, while the corporations refuse even to pay tax.

  3. Red Robbo
    January 3, 2020 at 11:19

    Strangely absent from this article is the fact that wealthy Chinese now outnumber their US counterparts for the first time. Additionally, China is leading the way in minting new billionaires: two per week! The estimated net worth of the 153 members of China’s Parliament and its advisory body amounts to $650 billion! According to a Peking University report from 2016, the income disparity is getting worse with the top 1 percent owning a third of the country’s wealth and the bottom 25 percent of the population just 1 percent. The 99% never voted for this! The top 0.1% of American households hold the same amount of wealth as the bottom 90% and every 38 seconds a U.S. citizen dies of poverty and poverty-related social conditions. Warren Buffett: ‘there’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.’ Winning worldwide.

    • Cratylus
      January 3, 2020 at 14:20

      There is a difference between these other cases and China. China has brought 800 million people out of poverty, has created a middle class of over 300 million, is on schedule to eliminate the last remnants of abject poverty this year and to create a nation of the middle class by 2049, the 100th anniversary of New China’s foundation.
      More crucially in the US the creation of more wealth at the top has been accompanied by a falling standard of living at the bottom. In contrast in China as the top rises, so does the bottom. A rising tide is in fact lifting all boats even though inequality has grown.

      I would say the mention of all this is “strangely absent” from Red Robbo’s comments.

      Are the capitalist methods which China uses justified? You can answer that as you wish. But since their adoption China’s prosperity up and down the line has skyrocketed until now China has far and away the largest PPP-GDP on the planet. And the lives of virtually ALL have improved. I suspect if you ask the average Chinese, he or she is quite pleased with what has happened in the last 40 years. (This by the way is not to deny the importance of what happened in the previous 40 years. Even with all the mistakes of that period, China, stood up and remained standing under continuous assault from the West. Its sovereignty was rock solid – and it is on that rock that the next 40 years stands.)

  4. Patrick
    January 3, 2020 at 11:04

    This is a wonderful and enlightening piece of writing. Thank you!

Comments are closed.