Recalling the Crimes of Inhumanity

The Boston Marathon bombings have brought forth a frenzy of right-wing hate speech against Muslims who are depicted as mindlessly violent. But many of history’s worst atrocities including the Holocaust, the Vietnam War and even today’s “war on terror” — have been carried out primarily by Christians, as Gary G. Kohls recalls.

By Gary G. Kohls

April is Holocaust Remembrance month, an annual month-long event that encourages us humans to again confront the sobering reality of one of history’s most egregious examples of man’s inhumanity to man, known in the Jewish community as the Shoah.

Sadly, however, for anyone who has been paying attention to the epidemic of worldwide violence since the end of World War II, it is obvious that the promise of “Never Again” has been repeatedly violated. The cruelty of militarism, racism, anti-Semitism and poverty seem to be alive and well.

The gate into the Auschwitz death camp with the cruelly ironic motto: “Arbeit Macht Frei.”

Man’s inhumanity to man is clearly not a thing of the past. In fact it appears that nothing has been really learned since the last German Nazi extermination camp was revealed in 1945 or the last mass murder of innocent civilians was exposed in Vietnam or the CIA torturing was uncovered in the “war on terror.”

This essay will attempt to perhaps shed some light on some of the unlearned lessons of the above atrocities by examining some of the realities of what the Nazis called the Final Solution and what the rest of humanity calls the Holocaust.

Arbeit Macht Frei

A few years ago the wrought-iron gate to the infamous World War II-era extermination camp at Auschwitz, Poland, was stolen by thieves who had been paid to do so by a Neo-Nazi from Sweden. Ultimately the gate, which had been cut into three segments, was returned and replaced.

The top of that gate contained a bit of cunning propaganda that mockingly proclaimed to the slave-laborers at Auschwitz who walked under it twice a day, “Arbeit Macht Frei” (Work Makes One Free, a play on the words from the gospel of John: “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free”). Members of the radical right-wing, xenophobic, communist-hating and Jew-hating Nazi SS soldiers very likely chuckled at the cruel joke as they looked up at that gate.

“Arbeit Macht Frei” probably did have a positive message for the “Good Germans” who kept their mouths shut. In the triumphant “Deutschland Uber Alles” period of the late 1930s, most Good Germans, in the habit of fearing verbal or physical punishment from anybody in a position of authority, thought it was important and patriotic to work hard to help the Fuhrer build his Thousand Year Reich and then defend it by being willing to kill and die defending it.

Possibly inspired by the Arbeit Macht Frei slogan, obedient young German workers were conscripted, often against their wills, into the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront) after Hitler had abolished labor unions in Germany (and with them, the socialism that capitalism and its evil twin fascism – despise so vehemently).

The Labor Front’s involuntary low wages helped to create Hitler’s “economic miracle” which resulted in essentially full employment with thriving industries that were connected to weapons manufacturing and other aspects of Germany’s military/industrial complex.

Transportation systems involving railroads and automobiles (especially the building of the famous Autobahn) plus textile, chemical, agricultural, mining, pharmaceutical, metals production systems and concentration camps all thrived. Satisfied and therefore increasingly obedient Good Germans applauded Hitler for his economic genius.

After the post-World War I pain of hyperinflation, economic depression, market crashes, joblessness, homelessness, malnutrition and breadlines that followed that disastrous war (as happens after almost every war), Good Germans really appreciated having the jobs, the affordable vacation time, the affordable health care and the affordable educational opportunities.

Things were going well for Hitler’s Good Germans until the rest of the world finally was so fed up with the Nazi bullies that they retaliated against them with the full force of boycotts, sanctions, blockades and ultimately bombing. But by then it was already too late for the many oppressed minorities like Jews, gypsies, Slavs, foreigners and homosexuals, all of which were being killed, almost to extinction in the case of Jews and gypsies, under the military jackboot. Good Germans, with some notable exceptions, had been, during the good years, busy averting their eyes from what they saw happening all around them, too frightened to speak out.

By the end of the war, there were 140 or more Nazi concentration camps (1/3 of which were located in “occupied” and ethnically-cleansed Poland), starting with Dachau in 1933. Each one of the camps needed both military and civilian workers to keep them running smoothly, and thus the camps were also a part of Hitler’s economic boom. Torture, forced labor, starvation and death grew Germany’s GNP substantially.

The Commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hoess

Auschwitz was the most infamous of the camps. Good Germans almost universally lied when the camps were liberated, claiming that they hadn’t known that torture and mass murder were going on right under their noses, despite the fact that the distinctive odor of burning human flesh was unmistakable.

The commandant of Auschwitz, Lieutenant Colonel Rudolf Hoess of the Waffen-SS’s Death’s Head (Totenkopf) Unit, in testimony under oath following his capture in 1946 refuted that notion when he wrote:

“We were required to carry out these exterminations in secrecy but of course the foul and nauseating stench from the continuous burning of bodies permeated the entire area and all of the people living in the surrounding communities knew that exterminations were going on at Auschwitz.”

Hoess was not the equally infamous Rudolf Hess who was Hitler’s Deputy Fuhrer until he disgraced himself in the eyes of Hitler by flying to, and then crash landing in Scotland, without Hitler’s fore-knowledge or approval, on a misguided attempt to meet with the British and negotiate a peace settlement. Hitler ordered Hess to be shot on sight if he ever came back to Germany.

The Rudolf Hoess of Auschwitz infamy was the son of a devout Roman Catholic family whose father was well-to-do, conservative, anti-Semitic and a strict disciplinarian. His family actually had wanted him to go into the priesthood. (Hitler, interestingly enough, was also a baptized Catholic who had likewise considered entering the priesthood as a child. However, unlike Hitler, who never left the Catholic Church (and was never excommunicated from it), Hoess renounced his Catholicism when he was 20, around the time he joined the Nazi Party.)

Hoess learned unconditional obedience to authority at the hands of his harsh military veteran father (as did most Germans who had been immersed in the legacy of Prussian militarism). The child-rearing methods used on little Rudolf were probably not much different from what most German and Austrian children had experienced for generations (and even centuries) prior to Hitler’s obedience-demanding fascist regime.

Inflexible harshness was naturally inflicted upon German military recruits in basic training and was demanded of the Death’s Head Units that were responsible for the Nazi concentration camps. And since violence is contagious the previously victimized Nazis then obediently inflicted it upon the inmates.

Punitive parenting and harsh discipline was also the norm in both the secular and religious schools; and thus Hoess was able to write the following explanation for his willingness to reflexively carry out the decidedly un-Christ-like orders he received at Auschwitz:

“Above all, I was constantly reminded that I was to comply with, and follow, the wishes or commands of parents, teachers, priests, etc., indeed all grown-ups including the servants, and that I was to allow nothing to distract me from that duty. Whatever they said, went. These fundamental values of my upbringing became part of my flesh and blood.”

Military recruits who have been victimized at home by physical abuse more easily adapt to learning the killing arts. They somehow are more obedient to orders and can therefore react automatically in the war zone, obeying even illegal orders that are given in the heat of battle.

If SS soldiers working in the camps exhibited any compassion for prisoners or refused to obey illegal orders (such as the gassing of prisoners or the shooting of innocent women and children) they were threatened with transfer to front-line duty, a clear disincentive to be merciful. It can be assumed that Hoess never was conscious of the connections between his harsh child-rearing experiences and his unconditional obedience in reflexively carrying out illegal orders at Auschwitz.

In an affidavit read at Nuremberg, Hoess wrote:

“I commanded Auschwitz until 1 December 1943, and estimate that at least 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease, making a total dead of about 3,000,000. This figure represents about 70% or 80% of all persons sent to Auschwitz as prisoners, the remainder having been selected and used for slave labor in the concentration camp industries.

“Included among the executed and burnt were approximately 20,000 Russian prisoners of war (previously screened out of Prisoner of War cages by the Gestapo) who were delivered at Auschwitz in Wehrmacht transports operated by regular Wehrmacht officers and men. The remainder of the total number of victims included about 100,000 German Jews, and great numbers of citizens (mostly Jewish) from Holland, France, Belgium, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Greece, or other countries. We executed about 400,000 Hungarian Jews alone at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944.”

In his autobiography, written while he was awaiting his war crimes trial, Hoess wrote: “I want to emphasize that I personally never hated the Jews. I considered them to be the enemy of our nation. However, that was precisely the reason to treat them the same way as the other prisoners. Besides, the feeling of hatred is not in me. It is tragic that, although I was by nature gentle, good-natured, and very helpful, I became the greatest destroyer of human beings who carried out every order to exterminate people no matter what.”

A Recipe for Disaster

Duty and honor; solemn oaths; obedience to god and country and uber-patriotism (in the form of  “my country right or wrong” nationalism, “Deutchland Uber Alles” and “America # 1”) are common examples of patriotic urges that have driven the killing machines on all sides of every war throughout the history of the world. Internalizing such propaganda allowed Hoess to proudly and honorably perform his duties at Auschwitz, without any obvious signs of remorse when he was later tried, convicted and then hanged, overlooking Auschwitz, for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The baptized Catholic Heinrich Himmler (who was idolized by Hoess) and the Lutheran Adolph Eichmann (a direct superior of Hoess and a frequent visitor to Auschwitz) had also learned to obey orders from their abusive fathers, their dictatorial schoolmasters, their clergy leaders and ultimately their Nazi superiors, while simultaneously demanding obedience from their subordinates in the chain of military command below them.

Such victims of physical, emotional, spiritual or sexual abuse, especially in the case of males, are often driven to seek revenge against the original persecutors when they become strong enough. Unfortunately, the revenge is often taken out against weaker victims who often turn out to be innocent, often defenseless, scapegoats. This reality often explains the motivation behind the bullying behavior of individuals as well as nation-states.

One has to wonder: What kind of German Christianity was it that justified, contrary to the teachings of Jesus, cruelty in parenting, hateful attitudes toward the “other”, and the justification of war? What kind of German Christianity was it that did not stand up and courageously say “NO” to its nation’s manufacture and stockpiling of and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction whose only purpose is to slaughter humans and scorch the earth?

From where in the human soul comes the willingness to kill, maim, torture, enslave, or starve another human or even cooperate with the evils of state-sponsored homicide or genocide, whether your militarized nation is fascist Germany or “democratic” America?

Harshness in child-rearing is one of the realities that can easily result in the willingness to obey illegal orders to kill. Rudolf Hoess was a victim of cruel parenting, a xenophobic culture, an aberrant form of Christianity that justified war, violence and anti-Semitism and a war-glorifying Prussian militarism.

Do not think yourself better because you burn up friends and enemies with long-range missiles without ever seeing what you have done.

Thomas Merton wrote a powerful poem referring to the obedience of Rudolf Hoess. It follows below:

Chant to be Used in Processions Around a Site With Furnaces

By Thomas Merton (first published in The Catholic Worker)

How we made them sleep and purified them

How we perfectly cleaned up the people and worked a big heater

I was the commander   I made improvements and installed a guaranteed system taking account of human weakness   I purified and I remained decent

How I commanded

I made cleaning appointments and then I made the travelers sleep and after that I made soap

I was born into a Catholic family but as these people were not going to need a priest I did not become a priest   I installed a perfectly good machine    It gave satisfaction to many

When trains arrived the soiled passengers received appointments for fun in the bathroom they did not guess

It was a very big bathroom for two thousand people   It awaited arrival and they arrived safely

There would be an orchestra of merry widows not all the time   Much art

If they arrived at all they would be given a greeting card to send home   Taken care of with good jobs   Wishing you would come to our joke

Another improvement I made was I built the chambers for two thousand invitations at a time   the naked votaries were disinfected with Zyklon B

Children of tender age were always invited by reason of their youth   They were unable to work   They were marked out for play

They were washed like the others and more than the others

Very frequently women would hide their children in the piles of clothing but of course when we came to find them we would send the children into the chamber to be bathed

How I often commanded and made improvements and sealed the door on top   There were flowers   The men came with crystals

I guaranteed always the crystal parlor

I guaranteed the chamber and it was sealed   You could see through portholes

They waited for the shower   It was not hot water that came through vents though Efficient winds gave full satisfaction   Portholes showed this

The satisfied all ran together to the doors awaiting arrival   It was guaranteed   They made ends meet.

How I could tell by their cries that love came to a full stop   I found the ones I had made clean after about a half hour

Jewish male inmates then worked up nice   They had rubber boots in return for adequate food   I could not guess their appetite

Those at the door were taken apart out of a fully stopped love for rubber male inmates   strategic hair and teeth being used later for defense

Then the males removed all clean love rings and made away with happy gold

A big new firm promoted steel forks operating on a cylinder   They got the contract and with faultless workmanship delivered very fast goods

How I commanded and made soap   “12 pounds fat 10 quarts water 8 ounces to a pound of caustic soda” but it was hard to find any fat
”For transporting the customers we suggest using light carts on wheels   A drawing is submitted”

“We acknowledge four steady furnaces and an emergency guarantee”

I am a big new commander   Operating on a cylinder I elevate the purified materials   “boil for 2 to 3 hours and then cool”

For putting them into a test fragrance I suggested an express elevator operated by the latest cylinder   It was guaranteed

Their love was fully stopped by our perfected ovens but the love rings were salvaged

Thanks to the satisfaction of male inmates operating the heaters without need of compensation   Our guests were warmed

All the while I had obeyed perfectly

So I was hanged in a commanding position with a full view of the site plant and grounds

You smile at my career but you would do as I did if you knew yourself and dared

In my days we worked hard   we saw what we did    Our self sacrifice was conscientious and complete   Our work was faultless and detailed

Gary G. Kohls, MD, is a founding member of Every Church A Peace Church ( and is a member of a local non-denominational affiliate of ECAPC, the Community of the Third Way.

6 comments for “Recalling the Crimes of Inhumanity

  1. Theo
    April 28, 2013 at 10:18

    Why is it in any mention of “isms” that sexism/misogyny is always left out? And those that continually leave it out are males?

  2. MikeH
    April 25, 2013 at 19:24

    I am certain that Rudolf Hoess and other Germans raised during the time he was raised were always reminded, in forceful terms, of the commandment to unconditionally “honor your father and mother,” and that any affront to their parents was an affront to God.

    I think that this commandment, which is one of the so-called “Ten Commandments” attributed to God which are central to traditional Judeo-Christian and Western Morality, and thus accepted without question, is a major part of the problem. (And there are similar injunctions in other cultures to always honor one’s parents; the Chinese culture in particular admonishes respect to one’s parents and elders.)

    The Bible was written and put together by fallible human beings, and at its very best exhibits human fallibility and human prejudice just like anything else that has ever been written. One of the things in the Bible that is very definitely wrong is the commandment to “honor your father and mother”, which in the biblical text is unconditional and does not make any exceptions if one’s parents are abusive or are otherwise bad parents. In particular it is very wrong to tell a person who has or who has had abusive parents to honor such parents.

    I would think that any good or competent parent, or any parent with any self-respect, does not need any backing of a commandment from God. It is bad or abusive parents who need such a commandment. The commandment really serves to give legitimacy to bad or abusive parents, who can invoke the commandment if they are displeased or offended by something their child says or does.

    It should be very obvious, if one thinks about it, that if a person has been taught since childhood to honor one’s parents even if they are abusive, and to be mortally afraid of challenging or questioning one’s parents (under threat of punishment, either physical or otherwise), then that person will almost certainly not dare to challenge or question other authorities (religious, political, or otherwise) later in life. This was shown to be the case with many “good Germans” as documented in Alice Miller’s book For Your Own Good mentioned above. A child like Rudolf Hoess, after being taught to unquestioningly honor and obey his parents, will later unquestioningly obey the authorities who require him to run the concentration camps.

    Alice Miller in her books and writings implicates the commandment to “honor your father and mother”.

    If anything there should be a commandment for parents to treat their children with dignity and respect, that they (the children) may come to treat themselves and others with dignity and respect. Or a commandment to parents to earn and to be worthy of the love and honor and respect of their children.

  3. Paul G.
    April 25, 2013 at 03:31

    For an excellent description of German child rearing philosophy read: Alice Miller, For Your Own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of Violence. She is a Jungian analyst who studied the German child rearing texts of the late 19th and early 20th century, the generation that created the generation of the Third Reich. She includes a very detailed description of young Adolf’s upbringing which included, for the sake of proper discipline, daily beatings. BTW the British upper classes and their “public schools” were pretty harsh too.

    • MikeH
      April 25, 2013 at 19:39

      Minor correction: I don’t think that Alice Miller was a Jungian (or a Freudian either). In particular she very strongly disagreed with Jung’s idea of some mysterious “Shadow” (or Freud’s “death instinct”) that was responsible for evil in people. Such an idea she considered to be an evasion of what she considered to be the real truth, which is that evil, or actually destructiveness, is not innate in humans, but rather is a consequence of repressed childhood abuse and humiliation that has not been consciously felt and acknowledged and dealt with.

  4. incontinent reader
    April 24, 2013 at 23:17

    Over the past 40 years of war, to which country have the President and Congress been most beholden? Who controls Hollywood? Who controls the banks and Wall Street? Who controls the mainstream media? Who controls General Dynamics? Who are the neocons who created the strategy for the “War on Terror” and the planned incineration and decimation of the Middle East? What nation is most imbedded in our military and the police departments of our major cities? Who has been committing espionage and stealing our nuclear and other top secrets for over 40 years? What nation’s economy and military have been most subsidized and facilitated in the war on terror?

    One is deeply sorrowful for the horrendous tragedy of the Holocaust, but one also recognizes that there been many other holocausts.

    With all due respect, when it comes to religion these wars and ethnic cleansings have been equal opportunity employers.

    • F. G. Sanford
      April 25, 2013 at 04:15

      Isn’t it strange- those are some of the same people who whine and howl about “affirmative action”. None of them ever complain about corporate welfare, though. The revolving door keeps spinning, and serves as a place-holder for these folks to go from government, to defense, to think-tank punditry, and their only real qualification appears to be the consensus of their cronies. It’s a form of cultural nepotism, and nobody complains. Isn’t it time we gave somebody else a chance?

Comments are closed.