Corporate Interests Behind Ukraine Putsch

Behind the U.S.-backed coup that ousted the democratically elected president of Ukraine are the economic interests of giant corporations from Cargill to Chevron which see the country as a potential “gold mine” of profits from agricultural and energy exploitation, reports JP Sottile.

By JP Sottile

On Jan. 12, a reported 50,000 “pro-Western” Ukrainians descended upon Kiev’s Independence Square to protest against the government of President Viktor Yanukovych. Stoked in part by an attack on opposition leader Yuriy Lutsenko, the protest marked the beginning of the end of Yanukovych’s four year-long government.

That same day, the Financial Times reported a major deal for U.S. agribusiness titan Cargill.

A screen shot of U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland speaking to U.S. and Ukrainian business leaders on Dec. 13, 2013, at an event sponsored by Chevron, with its logo to Nuland’s left.

A screen shot of U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland speaking to U.S. and Ukrainian business leaders on Dec. 13, 2013, at an event sponsored by Chevron, with its logo to Nuland’s left.

Despite the turmoil within Ukrainian politics after Yanukovych rejected a major trade deal with the European Union just seven weeks earlier, Cargill was confident enough about the future to fork over $200 million to buy a stake in Ukraine’s UkrLandFarming. According to Financial Times, UkrLandFarming is the world’s eighth-largest land cultivator and second biggest egg producer. And those aren’t the only eggs in Cargill’s increasingly-ample basket.

On Dec. 13, Cargill announced the purchase of a stake in a Black Sea port. Cargill’s port at Novorossiysk, to the east of Russia’s strategically significant and historically important Crimean naval base, gives them a major entry-point to Russian markets and adds them to the list of Big Ag companies investing in ports around the Black Sea, both in Russia and Ukraine.

Cargill has been in Ukraine for over two decades, investing in grain elevators and acquiring a major Ukrainian animal feed company in 2011. And, based on its investment in UkrLandFarming, Cargill was decidedly confident amidst the post-EU deal chaos. It’s a stark juxtaposition to the alarm bells ringing out from the U.S. media, bellicose politicians on Capitol Hill and perplexed policymakers in the White House.

It’s even starker when compared to the anxiety expressed by Morgan Williams, President and CEO of the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council, which, according to its website, has been “Promoting U.S.-Ukraine business relations since 1995.” Williams was interviewed by the International Business Times on March 13 and, despite Cargill’s demonstrated willingness to spend, he said, “The instability has forced businesses to just go about their daily business and not make future plans for investment, expansion and hiring more employees.”

In fact, Williams, who does double-duty as Director of Government Affairs at the private equity firm SigmaBleyzer, claimed, “Business plans have been at a standstill.”

Apparently, he wasn’t aware of Cargill’s investment, which is odd given the fact that he could’ve simply called Van A. Yeutter, Vice President for Corporate Affairs at Cargill, and asked him about his company’s quite active business plan. There is little doubt Williams has the phone number because Mr. Yuetter serves on the Executive Committee of the selfsame U.S.-Ukraine Business Council. It’s quite a cozy investment club, too.

According to his SigmaBleyzer profile, Williams “started his work regarding Ukraine in 1992” and has since advised American agribusinesses “investing in the former Soviet Union.” As an experienced fixer for Big Ag, he must be fairly friendly with the folks on the Executive Committee.

Big Ag Luminaries

And what a committee it is, it’s a veritable who’s who of Big Ag. Among the luminaries working tirelessly and no doubt selflessly for a better, freer Ukraine are:

–Melissa Agustin, Director, International Government Affairs & Trade for Monsanto

–Brigitte Dias Ferreira, Counsel, International Affairs for John Deere

–Steven Nadherny, Director, Institutional Relations for agriculture equipment-maker CNH Industrial

–Jeff Rowe, Regional Director for DuPont Pioneer

–John F. Steele, Director, International Affairs for Eli Lilly & Company

And, of course, Cargill’s Van A. Yeutter. But Cargill isn’t alone in their warm feelings toward Ukraine. As Reuters reported in May 2013, Monsanto, the largest seed company in the world, plans to build a $140 million “non-GM (genetically modified) corn seed plant in Ukraine.”

And right after the decision on the EU trade deal, Jesus Madrazo, Monsanto’s Vice President for Corporate Engagement, reaffirmed his company’s “commitment to Ukraine” and “the importance of creating a favorable environment that encourages innovation and fosters the continued development of agriculture.”

Monsanto’s strategy includes a little “hearts and minds” public relations, too. On the heels of Mr. Madrazo’s reaffirmation, Monsanto announced “a social development program titled “Grain Basket of the Future” to help rural villagers in the country improve their quality of life.” The initiative will dole out grants of up to $25,000 to develop programs providing “educational opportunities, community empowerment, or small business development.”

The well-crafted moniker “Grain Basket of the Future” is telling because, once upon a time, Ukraine was known as “the breadbasket” of the Soviet Union. The CIA ranks Soviet-era Ukraine second only to Mother Russia as the “most economically important component of the former Soviet Union.”

In many ways, the farmland of Ukraine was the backbone of the USSR. Its “fertile black soil” generated over a quarter of the USSR’s agriculture. It exported “substantial quantities” of food to other republics and its farms generated four times the output of “the next-ranking republic.”

Although Ukraine’s agricultural output plummeted in the first decade after the break-up of the Soviet Union, the farming sector has been growing spectacularly in recent years. While Europe struggled to shake-off the Great Recession, Ukraine’s agriculture sector grew 13.7% in 2013.

Ukraine’s agriculture economy is hot. Russia’s is not. Hampered by the effects of climate change and 25 million hectares of uncultivated agricultural land, Russia lags behind its former breadbasket.

According to the Centre for Eastern Studies, Ukraine’s agricultural exports rose from $4.3 billion in 2005 to $17.9 billion in 2012 and, harkening the heyday of the USSR, farming currently accounts for 25 percent of its total exports. Ukraine is also the world’s third-largest exporter of wheat and of corn. And corn is not just food. It is also ethanol.

Feeding Europe

But people gotta eat, particularly in Europe. As Frank Holmes of U.S. Global Investors assessed in 2011, Ukraine is poised to become Europe’s butcher. Meat is difficult to ship, but Ukraine is perfectly located to satiate Europe’s hunger.

Just two days after Cargill bought into UkrLandFarming, Global Meat News (yes, “Global Meat News” is a thing) reported a huge forecasted spike in “all kinds” of Ukrainian meat exports, with an increase of  8.1% overall and staggering 71.4% spike in pork exports. No wonder Eli Lilly is represented on the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council’s Executive Committee. Its Elanco Animal Health unit is a major manufacturer of feed supplements.

And it is also notable that Monsanto’s planned seed plant is non-GMO, perhaps anticipating an emerging GMO-unfriendly European market and Europe’s growing appetite for organic foods. When it comes to Big Ag’s profitable future in Europe, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

For Russia and its hampered farming economy, it’s another in a long string of losses to U.S. encroachment, from NATO expansion into Eastern Europe to U.S. military presence to its south and onto a major shale gas development deal recently signed by Chevron in Ukraine.

So, why was Big Ag so bullish on Ukraine, even in the face of so much uncertainty and the predictable reaction by Russia?

The answer is that the seeds of Ukraine’s turn from Russia have been sown for the last two decades by the persistent Cold War alliance between corporations and foreign policy. It’s a version of the “Deep State” that is usually associated with the oil and defense industries, but also exists in America’s other heavily subsidized industry, agriculture.

Morgan Williams is at the nexus of Big Ag’s alliance with U.S. foreign policy. To wit, SigmaBleyzer touts Mr. Williams’ work with “various agencies of the U.S. government, members of Congress, congressional committees, the Embassy of Ukraine to the U.S., international financial institutions, think tanks and other organizations on U.S.-Ukraine business, trade, investment and economic development issues.”

As President of the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council, Williams has access to Council cohort, David Kramer, President of Freedom House. Officially a non-governmental organization, it has been linked with overt and covert “democracy” efforts in places where the door isn’t open to American interests, a.k.a. U.S. corporations.

Freedom House, the National Endowment for Democracy and National Democratic Institute helped fund and support the Ukrainian “Orange Revolution” in 2004. Freedom House is funded directly by the U.S. Government, the National Endowment for Democracy and the U.S. Department of State.

David Kramer is a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs and, according to his Freedom House bio page, formerly a “Senior Fellow at the Project for the New American Century.”

Nuland’s Role

That puts Kramer and, by one degree of separation, Big Ag fixer Morgan Williams in the company of PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan who, as coincidence would have it, is married to Victoria “F*ck the EU” Nuland, the current Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

Interestingly enough, Ms. Nuland spoke to the U.S.-Ukrainian Foundation last Dec. 13, extolling the virtues of the Euromaidan movement as the embodiment of “the principles and values that are the cornerstones for all free democracies.”

Nuland also told the group that the United States had invested more than $5 billion in support of Ukraine’s “European aspirations,” meaning pulling Ukraine away from Russia. She made her remarks on a dais featuring a backdrop emblazoned with a Chevron logo.

Also, her colleague and phone call buddy U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt helped Chevron cook up their 50-year shale gas deal right in Russia’s kitchen.

Although Chevron sponsored that event, it is not listed as a supporter of the Foundation. But the Foundation does list the Coca-Cola Company, ExxonMobil and Raytheon as major sponsors. And, to close the circle of influence, the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council is also listed as a supporter.

Which brings the story back to Big Ag’s fixer, Morgan Williams.

Although he was glum about the current state of investment in Ukraine, he’s gotta wear shades when he looks into the future. He told the International Business Times, “The potential here for agriculture/agribusiness is amazing production here could double.  The world needs the food Ukraine could produce in the future. Ukraine’s agriculture could be a real gold mine.”

Of course, his priority is to ensure that the bread of well-connected businesses gets lavishly buttered in Russia’s former breadbasket. And there is no better connected group of Ukraine-interested corporations than American agribusiness.

Given the extent of U.S. official involvement in Ukrainian politics, including the interesting fact that Ambassador Pyatt pledged U.S. assistance to the new government in investigating and rooting-out corruption, Cargill’s seemingly risky investment strategy probably wasn’t that risky, after all.

JP Sottile is a freelance journalist, radio co-host, documentary filmmaker and former broadcast news producer in Washington, D.C. His weekly show, Inside the Headlines w/ The Newsvandal, co-hosted by James Moore, airs every Friday on KRUU-FM in Fairfield, Iowa and is available online. He blogs at or you can follow him on Twitter, http://twitter/newsvandal.

12 comments for “Corporate Interests Behind Ukraine Putsch

  1. Elijah_John
    March 18, 2014 at 23:06

    It seems like Russia is being backed into a corner. At what point do they have no other choice except to go to war?

  2. March 18, 2014 at 21:58

    And the criminals in Kiev are going to take IMF money and let the IMF seize the Ukrainian pipelines.

    • Frances in California
      March 23, 2014 at 01:40

      Watch, particularly with IMF involved, as the Ukraine devolves: Western Ukraine becomes like Haiti and Crimea, sheltering economically under Russia almost like the Dominican Republic. And the US? War-profiteering all the way.

  3. Peter Lawless
    March 18, 2014 at 12:21

    Brilliant article ! I have wondered for years how Cargill operate so freely in Eastern Europe.

  4. Charlotte
    March 18, 2014 at 00:19

    So Monsanto is going to invest int eh Ukraine? They’ll rue the day. This is what happened to Indian farmers when they were forced to use Monsanto’s GMO seeds:

  5. Tom O'Neill
    March 17, 2014 at 21:31

    This article is impressive both in itself and for the replies it has elicited. Just as the traditional thrust toward American economic and political dominance has regularly been moved forward under the banner of humanitarianism (: war with Spain, subjugation of the Philippines, Viet Nam War, invasion of Iraq, etc.), so it seems this is the case at hand. While our TV media suggest that Putin is toying with the notion of renewing the Cold War (while assuring us that we are motivated simply by disinterested humanitarianism toward the Ukrainian people), Sottile demonstrates by a scrutiny of who the American players are that something different is going on. The U.S. is trying to pry loose from Russian influence a region on the border of Russia of great importance to Russia’s economy. Were the U.S. simply abiding by the deliberations of the Ukrainian people, there would be nothing objectionable about our behavior. This however, as the article recounts, is not what is happening. As I say, the article is an important one.

  6. March 17, 2014 at 04:46

    Insightful article…. And so the puzzle pieces fit together…

  7. John
    March 16, 2014 at 22:59

    My my these corporations are busy busy, while they have the rest of us watching nude 20 year olds swing back and forth on wrecking balls.

  8. March 16, 2014 at 22:23

    Thank you, and I have reposted your article. It reveals what underlies the sharpness of the inter-imperialist contradictions over control of Ukraine as well as the crimes being carried out by the big powers of the U.S. and Europe against the Ukrainian people. You note David Kramer’s involvement in the Ukraine and his background in the Bush regime. Before joining Freedom House in 2010, Kramer was an adjunct professor at the Elliott School for International Affairs at The George Washington University and “senior transatlantic fellow” at the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). The GMF, through its newly-formed Black Sea Trust, financed by USAID and the Stewart Mott Foundation, directly initiated the Kiev Security Forum in April, 2007 – an organizing platform for NATO, EU integration and neo-liberalism under the pretext of “public policy” – and then the Halifax International Security Forum (HISF) aka the Halifax War Conference in November, 2009. The Kiev Forum was co-sponsored by the Open Ukraine Foundation of Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the Wall Street-supported usurper puppet prime minister of Ukraine, who at the time was Minister of Foreign Affairs, with funds from the usual suspects of “humanitarian intervention” and “democracy promotion.” Through this and other means a fifth column was groomed within the Ukraine to annex the country to serve the corporate interests that you document. This conformed to the recommendations of the Princeton Project to Obama about establishing new international networks of “regional elites” in the manner of the Cold War. Further, we can extrapolate that the same process in the Ukraine is also being carried out by the imperialists in my country of Canada and elsewhere. Kramer is now secretary of its board of the HISF, whose president David Van Praagh was in 2007 head of the GMF’s Black Sea Trust, and whose headquarters are in Washington but entirely financed by Canadian taxdollars. The Harper war government is also funding destabilization projects of Freedom House in different countries, as well as the George Soros Renaissance Foundation in the Ukraine to give “medical aid” including training to the armed rioters on the Maidan, etc. The Kiev NATO Information and Documentation Centre, a “partner” in the Kiev Security Forum, is operated by Canada. Furthermore, the anti-farmer policies of the annexed Harper government such as the destruction of the wheat board, subsidizing beef companies to expand production, and the integration of the US and Canadian agricultural industry into a continental market, are in the direct service of Cargill et al. Cargill, a U.S. private company remains the largest beef processor in Canada, controlling 55 per cent of the industry. Its 2011 revenue worldwide was more than $109 billion with profits of over $3.3 billion. Cargill controls 22 per cent of U.S. supply.

  9. incontinent reader
    March 16, 2014 at 19:24

    Great research, terrific article. You’ve nailed this one.

    • small potatoes
      March 28, 2014 at 16:02

      Not really. The key factual point is that Cargill brought a $200m.stake in UkrLandFarming (Novorossiysk is a port on the Russian mainland not in Crimea).. Just 6 months or so earlier, other sources reported that an agreement had been signed “between the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and KSG Agro, Ukraine’s leading agricultural company”. The agreement was worth $2.6 billion over 50 years with initial transfer of 100,000 hectares of land, eventually to be expanded to 3 million ha of agricultural land,.
      The previous year, “the Export-Import Bank of China approved a US$3 billion agricultural loan to the [Ukraine]”

      Big arigcultural companies invest in agriculture in foreign countries, that’s what they do, The home country of those companies may sometimes gets involved in the politics of the same foriegn country, that’s also what they do.

  10. Just Me
    March 16, 2014 at 14:13

    “………..but Ukraine is perfectly located to satiate Europe’s hunger.” USA corporations control the farmland then USA corporations control Europe. Somehow, I believe Europe won’t like that set up, but I could be wrong since Europe has steadily and sadly drifted to the extreme right over the past three decades for the sake of $$.
    As for the Ukrainians, they may be salivating over all the $$$$$ being poured into their country by the likes of Cargill, Monsanto and Chevron, but, down the road a piece, they will be sorry–then it will be too late. Monsanto will eventually sow its GMO frankenseed in that rich soil and evict the small farmers from their land just as they have done and are doing here. Cargill and Chevron will poison the land with chemicals and eventually lay it to waste. This global theft by corporations of land and wealth seems to be unstoppable. What a sad state of affairs.

Comments are closed.