Zionism’s Lost Shine

Secretary of State John Kerry got an agreement for renewed Israeli-Palestinian talks, but Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s insistence that Israel not only keep much of the Occupied Territories but be formally recognized as a Jewish state precludes a just resolution for the Arab people of Palestine and promises continued resistance, as Lawrence Davidson explains.

By Lawrence Davidson

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement directed toward Israel started in 2005 when a coalition of Palestine-based social and economic organizations called for such a comprehensive effort. At first the BDS movement appeared to be a long shot.

Israel, with its worldwide coterie of Zionist supporters, both Jewish and Christian, seemed invincible. Particularly in the Western world, the belief in Israel’s legitimacy had reached the status of sacred tradition. The Zionists worked very hard to achieve this status by controlling the historical interpretation of events that had led from World War I and the Balfour Declaration to the creation of Israel in 1948 and beyond.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

They might well have been able to maintain control of Israel’s past, present and future if the Zionist leadership had not succumbed to the sin of hubris. They became so ideologically self-righteous and militarily muscle-bound that they believed their place in the world to be untouchable. Thus, as they built a country based on discrimination and colonial expansion in an age increasingly critical of such societies, they refused all compromise with the Palestinians and treated criticism of their behavior and policies as at once anti-Semitic and irrelevant. They therefore failed to notice that their stubbornness was allowing others to erode the Zionist version of the history of modern Palestine/Israel.

Eight years is not a very long time, but a surprising amount has been accomplished. Increasing numbers of people, particularly in the Western world, have been made aware of the plight of the Palestinians as well as their version of the history of Palestine/Israel. With this change in historical perspective, BDS established a foothold and started to grow. The movement has spent most of its time since 2005 coordinating a series of efforts to convince private-sector consumers, businesses, academics and artists to cut their ties with the Zionist State and its colonies.

The latest success in this effort came just recently, when two of the largest supermarket chains in the Netherlands announced they would no longer sell Israeli merchandise manufactured or grown in the Occupied Territories (OT). Indeed, so successful has BDS been that the Israeli government has established an official task force to counteract it.

European Union Makes a Move

 

Another recent event may be even more significant, because it suggests the potential for expanding BDS from the private to the public sphere. This was signaled when the European Union (EU) issued new rules for implementing certain categories of funding agreements with Israel. Funding of grants, prizes, loans and other financial cooperative ventures will now exclude Israeli institutions located in or doing business with the OT.

I want to emphasize the notion of “potential” because the EU move is not a boycott action as such. It is a signal to Israel that the EU will not recognize Israel’s claim to any part of the Occupied Territories without a peace settlement, and therefore this move serves as a point of pressure on the Israeli government to give up its hubris and negotiate with the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). By the way, the PNA as presently constituted is not a representative body and therefore has no legal authority to negotiate anything. However, the EU (along with the Israelis and the United States) persistently ignores this fact.

Nonetheless, this EU ruling is a step in the right direction, and some important Israelis understand the message. For instance, the Israeli peace organization Gush Shalom released a statement saying the “EU has started to confront the government of Israel – and every citizen of Israel – with a road sign that cannot be ignored.” At least not without moving Israel toward “being an international pariah.”

The renowned columnist and reporter for Israel’s newspaper Haaretz, Gideon Levy, has declared “The change [Israel needs] won’t come from within. . . . Change will only come from the outside.” Therefore, “Anyone who really fears for the future of the country needs to be in favor of boycotting it economically.”

And, Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, the present government’s only minister publicly in favor of negotiations with the Palestinians, has warned that the threat of European economic sanctions extends beyond the OT. “It’s true that it will begin with the settlements,” she stated. “But their [a growing number of Europeans’] problem is with Israel, which is perceived as a colonialist country, so it won’t stop with the settlements and will reach all of Israel.”

Livni is correct. Israel’s version of history notwithstanding, the country’s origin is as a colonial settler state. As suggested above, the result was an inherently discriminatory society. This is not because most Israeli citizens are Jewish. It is because most are Zionists.

Modern Zionism, which still reflects the colonial outlook of Nineteenth Century imperial Europe, is the guiding ideology of Israel, and it proclaims that the country must be a Jewish State. Unfortunately, you can’t design a country for one group only in a land where there also exists other sizable groups and not end up with a discriminatory and oppressive society. Therefore, even if, by some miracle, the Israelis see the light and withdraw from the OT, there will still be a BDS movement agitating for an end to discrimination against non-Jews within the 1948 borders.

Israel’s Negative Reaction

 

Becoming a real democracy, where all citizens enjoy genuine political equality, is Israel’s only way of escaping the inevitable isolation that comes with the growing BDS movement. Yet, there is no reason to believe that the ideologues who now control the Israeli political and religious power structures are going to move in this direction. One can see this not only from the growing effort the Israeli government is putting into countering BDS, but also from the angry reaction of its political leaders to the EU decision.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the EU decision with the temperament of a monarch. “We will not accept any external edicts on our borders.” That was, perhaps, the royal “we” he used. Then it was back to the first-person singular: “I will not let anyone harm the hundreds of thousands of Israelis living in Judea and Samaria, in the Golan Heights, or in Jerusalem – our united capital.”

The prime minister was quite off base in his pronouncements. He is the head of a country that has meticulously avoided setting borders for decades just so Israel could expand at opportune moments. That sort of imperial behavior is not well accepted in today’s world. Also, unless he can greatly increase Zionist lobby leverage on the EU, he has no way to prevent the “harm” that may finally befall his compatriots for naively assuming the whole world will accept their criminal behavior forever.

The entire episode points to the fact that, both in the private and public sectors of Western society, greater numbers of people no longer follow the line of historical interpretation set down by the Zionists. This is a major shift. Many Zionists might see this as a sign of growing anti-Semitism, but it really is nothing of the sort. There is nothing inherently Jewish about discrimination and colonialism. However, the same cannot be said for modern Zionism.

Again, the BDS movement is only eight years old. We can compare this to the more than 30 years it took the boycott of South Africa to end apartheid. So, comparatively, BDS is only at the beginning of its trek. Its fast start and ongoing achievements should bring hope and pride to those involved in the movement. They should also raise some serious second thoughts in the minds of those Israelis who think Netanyahu and his government of ideologues can prevent their country’s increasing isolation.

Lawrence Davidson is a history professor at West Chester University in Pennsylvania. He is the author ofForeign Policy Inc.: Privatizing America’s National Interest; America’s Palestine: Popular and Official Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli Statehood; and Islamic Fundamentalism.

Share this Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • email

11 comments on “Zionism’s Lost Shine

  1. Rehmat on said:

    Israeli journalist, Larry Derfner, believes that Kerry’s latest dance (kabuki) is meant to hijack PA bid to take Israel to the International Criminal Court over occupation.

    “So maybe Netanyahu really is blessed. Just when the strategy of punishing Israel for the occupation had finally begun to gain traction, just when the Israeli establishment was genuinely alarmed that the boycott movement had been given a decisive push forward by Stephen Hawking and the EU, and when the PA looked like it would be going to the UN and afterward to The Hague with the wind at its back, Kerry comes along and pulls this country’s nuts out of the fire,” says Derfner.

    The reaction to John Kerry’s announcement among the regional players was outright pessimistic. Several Israeli cabinet ministers rejected it while commentators predicted failure of the talks. Democratically elected Hamas rejected the talks – and Iran called the talks meant to give the Zionist entity more breathing space.

    “Such talks were held 21 years ago. They failed utterly,” wrote Nahum Barnea, columnist for top selling daily Yediot Aharonot.

    http://rehmat1.com/2013/07/22/kerrys-israel-pa-peace-talks-kabuki/

  2. Stephen Schertz on said:

    This holds to the same flawed assumption – Israel is wrong for holding lands gained from their neighbors attacking them. Therefore must come to the “peace” table before there is recognition of their right to exist as a nation. So two non-entities must agree on a land settlement that neither can lay claim to because neither is a sovereign nation? WOW!! so rise up Navahoes, Apaches, Souix, and all other american Indians. With this premise you should be able to negotiate 1000′s of acres away from the U. S.!

  3. Steve on said:

    Stephen loved your flawed assumption… virtually every high level Israeli politician or military leader brags at how they were able to goad the Egyptians into a war they did not want.

    Israel knew it had superior firepower and forces. What did you expect the Arabs even though they were poorly equipped and trained to do when they find out how Israel massacred villages of innocent people? Heck your people did it to the citizens of Jericho, the Canaanites and others you so proudly massacred.

  4. TITLE Boxing Club McAllen on said:

    Well, one thing we know is that this will continue to be an issue for a while. Hopefully it gets resolved soon.

    ———–
    http://mcallen.titleboxingclub.com/contact/

  5. chmoore on said:

    So let’s see – Netanyahu wants Israel to be formally recognized as a Jewish state; even though Israel’s own government has trouble recognize itself as such.

    To see what I mean, use a search engine to find latest news RE Coalition talks on bill defining Israel as Jewish State break down.

    It looks like a faction within Israel would like to use U.S. influence in Iraeli-Palestinian peace talks to leverage one side of an on-going internal argument within their own government.

    The ‘Basic Laws of Israel’ are supposed to substitute for their non-existent constitution, but if there’s a ‘Basic Law’ that says they’re specifically a Jewish state, I certainly can’t find it.

  6. rosemerry on said:

    Israel is “a State for all the Jews” (whether they want to live there or not), yet Jews are also to be cherished in every other nation where they thrive as citizens, or it is the wicked “antisemitism” at work. People who are not Jews ‘eg the 40000 or more Bedouin citizens of Israel) can be expelled from their homes and ill treated, as of course the Palestinians (terrorists all) have suffered for decades. When the EU finally brings in a limited restriction on Israel’s illegal settlements, Netanyahu stops EU aid in Palestine, which of course is completely unable to be visited without the “Jewish State’s” permission.
    How the “international community” accepts this behaviour while pretending to care about human rights, democracy etc is unfathomable.

    • Jews are certainly not cherished in France, where Jewish emigration is in the double digits.

    • borat on said:

      What about the “palestinian” celebrations in Ramallah, regarding the release of the murderers who murderer children, the violators of dead bodies, the ones who burn women alive?

      The so called “palestinian” partner for peace is a bloodthirsty group that dances in honor of the release of 104 barbarians.

  7. Morton Kurzweil on said:

    There is no just solution to a political agreement. Morality is whatever each side recognizes as right. Diplomacy is the ability to concede a moral position for a practical advantage. If the advantage is in favor of the people the solution mat work. If the advantage favors a political adversary the result is temporary and serves to defeat the process. If defeat is desired it is in the interests of politicians, not the people they represent.

  8. Gerhard Falk on said:

    The anti-Israel diatribes are nothing more than warmed up hatred of Jews derived from Christ killer legends and other European psychoses.The anti-Israel ranters want to kill anothe 6 million Jews. That is the true and only issue between Israel and the so-called Palestianians and their supporter. The Jews of Israel seek to survive the killers who evidently find the mass murder of six millin European Jews not enaough.