The U.S. president’s cuts to education under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism are an effort to enforce totalitarianism in the minds of future generations. Questions are not to be asked, myths are to be enforced.

I Stink Therefore I Am – by Mr. Fish.
The attacks on colleges and universities — Donald Trump’s administration has warned some 60 colleges that they could lose federal money if they fail to make campuses safe for Jewish students and is already pulling $400 million from Columbia University — has nothing to do with fighting antisemitism.
Antisemitism is a smoke screen, a cover for a much broader and more insidious agenda. The goal, which includes plans to abolish the Department of Education and terminate all programs of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), is to turn the educational system, from kindergarten to graduate school, into an indoctrination machine.
Totalitarian regimes seek absolute control over the institutions that reproduce ideas, especially the media and education. Narratives that challenge the myths used to legitimize absolute power — in our case historical facts that blemish the sanctity of white male supremacy, capitalism and Christian fundamentalism — are erased.
There is to be no shared reality. There are to be no other legitimate perspectives. History is to be static. It is not to be open to reinterpretation or investigation. It is to be calcified into myth to buttress a ruling ideology and the reigning political and social hierarchy. Any other paradigm of power and social interaction is tantamount to treason.
“One of the most significant threats that a class hierarchy can face is a universally accessible and excellent public school system,” writes Jason Stanley in Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future:
“The political philosophy that feels this threat most acutely — and that unites hostility toward public education with support for class hierarchy — is a certain form of rightwing libertarianism, an ideology that sees free markets as the wellspring of human freedom. These kinds of libertarians oppose government regulation and virtually all forms of public goods, including public education. The political goal of this version of libertarian ideology is to dismantle public goods.
The dismantling of public education is backed by oligarchs and business elites alike, who see in democracy a threat to their power, and in the taxes required for public goods a threat to their wealth. Public schools are the foundational democratic public good. It is therefore perfectly logical that those who are opposed to democracy, including fascist and fascist-leaning movements, would join forces with right-wing libertarians in undermining the institution of public education.”
I taught Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States in a New Jersey prison classroom. Zinn’s book is one of the primary targets of the far-right. Trump denounced Zinn in 2020 at the White House Conference on American History, saying, “Our children are instructed from propaganda tracts, like those of Howard Zinn, that try to make students ashamed of their own history.”
Teaching Zinn in Prison
Zinn implodes the lies used to glorify the conquest of the Americas. He allows readers to see the United States through the eyes of Native Americans, immigrants, the enslaved, women, union leaders, persecuted socialists, anarchists and communists, abolitionists, anti-war activists, civil rights leaders and the poor.
He holds up the testimonies of Sojourner Truth, Chief Joseph, Henry David Thoreau, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. Du Bois, Randolph Bourne, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.
As I gave my lectures I would hear students mutter “Damn” or “We been lied to.”

Zinn at Pathfinder book store in Los Angeles in August 2000. (Slobodandimitrov, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0)
Zinn makes clear that organized militant forces opened up democratic space in American society. None of these democratic rights — the abolition of slavery, the right to strike, equality for women, Social Security, the eight-hour work day, civil rights — were given to us by a benevolent ruling class. It involved struggle and self-sacrifice. Zinn, in short, explains how democracy works.
Zinn’s book was revered in my cramped prison classroom. It was revered because my students intimately understood how white privilege, racism, capitalism, poverty, police, the courts and lies peddled by the powerful, deformed their communities and their lives.
Zinn allowed them to hear, for the first time, the voices of their ancestors. He wrote history, not myth. He not only educated my students, but empowered them. I had always admired Zinn. After that class I too revered him.
Zinn, when he was teaching at Spelman College, a historically Black women’s college in Atlanta, became involved in the civil rights movement. He served on the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He marched with his students demanding civil rights. Spelman’s president was not amused.
“I was fired for insubordination,” Zinn recalled. “Which happened to be true.”
Learning to Question Dogma
Education is meant to be subversive. It gives students the ability and the language to ask questions about reigning assumptions and ideas. It questions dogma and ideology. It can, as Zinn writes, “counteract the deception that makes the government’s force legitimate.”
It lifts up the voices of the marginalized and oppressed to honor a plurality of perspectives and experiences. This leads, when education works, to empathy and understanding, a desire to right historical wrongs, to make society better. It fosters the common good.
Education is not only about knowledge, it is about inspiration. It is about passion. It is about the belief that what we do in life matters. It is about, as James Baldwin writes in his essay “The Creative Process,” the ability to drive “to the heart of every answer and expose the question the answer hides.”
The rightwing attacks on programs such as critical race theory or DEI, as Stanley points out in his book,
“intentionally distort these programs to create the impression that those whose perspectives are finally included — like Black Americans, for instance — are receiving some sort of illicit benefit or unfair advantage. And so they target Black Americans who have risen to positions of power and influence and seek to delegitimize them as undeserving. The ultimate goal is to justify a takeover of the institutions, transforming them into weapons in the war against the very idea of multi-racial democracy.”
The integrity and quality of public higher education in America has been under assault for decades, as Ellen Schrecker documents in her book The Lost Promise: American Universities in the 1960s.
The protests on college campuses in the 1960s, Schrecker points out, saw “the enemies of the liberal academy” attack its “ideological and financial underpinnings.”
Tuitions, once low, if not free, have soared, and with them tremendous student debt. State legislators and the federal government have slashed funding to public universities, forcing them to seek support from corporations and reduce most faculty to the status of poorly paid adjuncts, often lacking benefits, as well as job security.
Nearly 75 percent of the instruction at colleges and universities is in the hands of adjuncts, part-time lecturers and non-tenure-track full-time faculty, who have no hope of being granted tenure, according to the American Federation of Teachers.
Public institutions, which serve 80 percent of the nation’s students, are chronically short of funding and basic resources. Higher education has evolved, even at major research universities, into vocational training, no longer a vehicle for learning but economic mobility.
The assault sees elite schools, where tuition can run over $80,000 a year, cater to the wealthy and the privileged, locking out the poor and the working class.
“The current academy functions primarily to replicate an increasingly inequitable status quo, it is hard to imagine how it could be restructured to serve a more democratic purpose without external pressure for something like universal free higher education,” Schrecker writes.
Totalitarian societies do not teach students how to think but what to think. They churn out students who are historically and politically illiterate, blinded by an enforced historical amnesia. They seek to produce servants and apologists who conform, not critics and rebels. Liberal arts colleges, for this reason, do not exist in totalitarian states.
Book Bans
PEN America has documented nearly 16,000 book bans in public schools nationwide since 2021, a number, PEN writes, “not seen since the Red Scare McCarthy era of the 1950s.” These books include titles such as The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, The Color Purple by Alice Walker and Maus, the graphic novel on the Holocaust by Art Spiegelman.

Book banning protest in Atlanta, February 2022. (John Ramspott / Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 2.0)
The most important human activity, as Socrates and Plato remind us, is not action, but contemplation, echoing the wisdom enshrined in eastern philosophy. We cannot change the world if we cannot understand it. By digesting and critiquing the philosophers and realities of the past, we become independent thinkers in the present.
We are able to articulate our own values and beliefs, often in opposition to what these ancient philosophers advocated. A capacity to think, to ask the right questions, however is a threat to totalitarian regimes seeking to inculcate a blind obedience to authority.
Unconscious civilizations are totalitarian wastelands. They replicate and embrace dead ideas, captured in José Clemente Orozco’s mural “The Epic of American Civilization” where skeletons in academic robes bring forth baby skeletons.

Orozco’s painting at Dartmouth College in 2008. (Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0)
“Before they seize power and establish a world according to their doctrines, totalitarian movements conjure up a lying world of consistency which is more adequate to the needs of the human mind than reality itself; in which, through sheer imagination, uprooted masses can feel at home and are spared the never-ending shocks which real life and real experiences deal to human beings and their expectations,” Hannah Arendt writes in The Origins of Totalitarianism.
“The force possessed by totalitarian propaganda — before the movements have the power to drop iron curtains to prevent anyone’s disturbing, by the slightest reality, the gruesome quiet of an entirely imaginary world — lies in the ability to shut the masses off from the real world.”
As bad as things are, they are about to get much worse. The nation’s educational system is being dragged into the slaughterhouse, where it will be dismembered and privatized. The corporations profiting from the charter schools system and online colleges — whose primary concern is certainly not with education — replace real teachers with non-unionized, poorly trained instructors.
Students, rather than being educated, will be taught by rote and fed the familiar tropes of authoritarian playbooks — paeans to white supremacy, national purity, patriarchy and the nation’s duty to impose its “virtues” on others by force.
This mass indoctrination will not only ensure ignorance, but obedience. And that is the point.
Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for 15 years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East bureau chief and Balkan bureau chief for the paper. He previously worked overseas for The Dallas Morning News, The Christian Science Monitor and NPR. He is the host of show “The Chris Hedges Report.”
NOTE TO READERS: There is now no way left for me to continue to write a weekly column for ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show without your help. The walls are closing in, with startling rapidity, on independent journalism, with the elites, including the Democratic Party elites, clamoring for more and more censorship. Please, if you can, sign up at chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, “The Chris Hedges Report.”
This article is from Scheerpost, for which Chris Hedges writes a regular column. Click here to sign up for email alerts.
Views expressed in this interview may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
2 positions, that I feel go well together.
I oppose discrimination in hiring or any awarding of positions.
I oppose quotas and any mandating that certain people get certain positions.
The first is stupid. If you are not on top, you recognize the value in having the best person for the job actually get the job. You are trying to catch up. Your competition is ahead of you. You want the best person, no matter who it is. Its the arrogant elites who feel that they can give a job to someone who is not the best person. Its the arrogance of being on top and believing that one is destined to always be on top. But, you fail to give the job to the best people for long enough, and you will find yourself no longer on top. (see America).
Actually, this is the tale of English history. The English historically have a horrible time finding good leaders or good generals. So much so that the one’s who are actually competent are remembered for centuries. How many people can name English generals between Wellington and Montgomery (120 years apart)? America is independent of England now because the English could not find a good leader anywhere during that decade, either to sensibly run the government or to be good enough a general to defeat Washington’s tiny band of starving, freezing soldiers the winter of Valley Forge.
The problem with the English, and with the Europeans in general, is that their heavily class based system restricted leadership to a tiny group of elites who became elites by the question of “Who’s your Daddy?” Thus, the English, limiting their leadership to the upper class, have a long history of very bad leaders. And, if one looks at Europe today, one again sees a group of bad leaders that tend to upper-class and family connections from the Prussian Von ruling the EU downwards. The only change is that money can at times supplant family and class in buying a leadership job for a fool.
Its just as bad to give someone who is not competent the job because some quota says they must get the job, as it is to give it to them because you discriminate against the better candidate because you can’t give the job to “those people.” Either way, you end up with an incompetent fool in the job while the best person for the job is at best is underutilized and at worst has the gumption to rebel against you.
Notice that America has two parties which both object to giving the job to the best qualified. One group proceeds on Identity, one group proceeds on Loyalty, neither proceeds on Merit. Notice that America appears devoid of competent leaders. 2+2=?
Donald Trump … is not what Freedom looks like.
Why the book ban attracts Mr. Hedges towards the education system? Mr. Hedges and other great writers have been forgetting the hidden agenda of educational reforms that took place in late 70s which is the real cause of the troubles in current society.
People were given polished/morphed history but were educated intelligence enough to think. That caused Civil Rights Movement, Anti-War Movement, and other progressive movements. The Trilateral Commission’s assault on “over education” has resulted people not only educated wrongly, but also poorly.
The Trilateral Commission’s products are now the scholars who are writing text books. What a tragedy!!
DEI is another misleading concept to appease the downtrodden. Why not simply the education system emphasize respect for everyone? School text books are full of American exceptionalism and superiority in all subjects including science and mathematics. The schools now do not even stop white kids bullying other white kids, leave alone other kids. That is the current state of affairs of education.
Hitler burnt books, indoctrinated Germans not for a long time. The damage here has been happening for a very long time.
Wake up Hedges, Naders, Laurias, …. Please attack the root cause. Education!
Thank you Chris Hedges and Mr. Fish! “…As bad as things are, they are about to get much worse…” Correct!–>> Trump will now skim/tax 10% of University endowments verses the old 1%.
Chris it’s time for Elmer Gantry’s head-on with Faulkner’s Snopes Bros.
I disagree. Hedges has got this this upside down. The attacks on the Palestinian protests on College campuses is not a smokescreen. Our government’s crackdown on “Antisemitism” at the behest of the Zionist lobby is the main event occurring in our country today. The public’s confusion about why we should support Israel’s state sponsored genocide and apartheid is due to articles like this. Hedges is a skillful and articulate writer but the result of this article is to dismiss a determined propaganda net that has slowly and steadily settled over our entire lives. Because of this issue we have lost our sense of justice, morality and independance. From our Foreign Policy to our Public Education Policy, our leaders are acting out a script composed by Christian and Jewish Zionists. That it is not a front page story is evidence of the diabolical machinations of those amongst us who intend to dissolve our Constitutional structure.
War…not just on education. On anything he fancies. While out of office for 4 years, Trump must have been very busy preparing a list with all names of those he wants to get even with. Great presidency, eh?
Again, you and Zinn leave Chicanos out of the discussion!!!
Thankyou Mr. Fish for that wonderful depiction of “Donald Dump”.
I love your writing, Chris. But this one I disagree. Just like every great institution should celebrate. Cutting the federalism and bureaucracies hopefully will help to build back a ground up atmosphere on campuses that has been lost. Everything about these campuses (my son and friends have been to three of top ten universities) is a money crab. They have group think create these beautiful themes that the University works around to fit their needs. Anyone that looks at the inflationary numbers for costs of tuition compared to the skills and scores of the students should be appalled. I’m an old coot who believes that if you have a great idea, the money will come if look hard enough. And you can throw money at anything and will not create success. It is the people.
As a Marxist, I do not support Critical Race Theory or DEI because they lie about history. Critical race theory is behind the falsification of history known as the 1619 Project. DEI is a bourgeois idea that pretends to replace socialism. Socialism considers all human beings to be equal. DEI is astroturfing.
I agree, and would add a strong suspicion that DEI, CRT etc. are intentionally meant to focus on superficial identity politics, and away from class consciousness, class identity and class interests. We must be divided and distracted at all costs…
Of course, people of color have been discriminated against, and abused by the mostly white oligarchy, but instead of seeking Economic Justice, it’s all about superficial identity.
Working class people, no matter what gender, color, or sexual orientation, have far more in common than they do with the Oligarchy. If they ever united together, the oligarchy is finished. Thta’s what COINTELPRO was all about.
I’m honestly a little surprised to see Hedges take a position in defense of DEI grifters. Usually he has some critical words for the “boutique activism” (his own phrase) of identity politics-obsessed careerists that attach themselves like a cancer to class movements.
In biological systems all opportunities are exploited (human social/political systems are biological in form!). It would be surprising if ‘grifting’ were not a part of all attempts at increasing equity in human relations, as well as those more obviously devoted to excessive advantage and greed. It is very easy for individuals, trying to tease out these details, to prematurely conclude in the face of overwhelming complexity. Hedges seems to be less prone to this fault than most.
I’ll say one thing. I’m old enough that I was in school when “Affirmative Action” came into being. Well, more than one thing, because I’ll begin by saying that I always supported AA and voted for southern politicians who supported AA.
Originally, Affirmative Action was supposed to be temporary. Not short-term, but not permanent either. It was pushed as a “transition” from a society where people had been discriminated in many areas, including education and opportunity. Thus, for awhile, it made sense to make sure the next generations had access to education and opportunity. But it was always presented as a transition phase.
The argument against AA was that the people who got the jobs would then feel like they were entitled to the job and not like everyone else who had competed to get the job and did not have a legal percentage protecting them that said there must be this percentage of a group of people within a company or school. That AA would breed a culture where people felt like a job belonged to them because of something like skin color.
Now, I look back on those times, and feel like the people I was voting against had a better notion of human nature than I did when I was that young. AA has been renamed as DEI and is now pushed as a permanent condition that simply must be and must forever be.
For me, my Mama was a follower of Dr. King, and raised her child well.
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having
his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in
Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and
white girls as sisters and brothers.
I have a dream today.” “I Have a Dream” speech, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The thing about the modern left is that their content of their character is appalling.
Great article, but you left out Eugene V. Debs.
Corporatism is fascism. The hour is late. I hope we are able to organize to stop it’s march before it’s too late to do so.
There is little to add to this piece in either appreciation or criticism; Hedges knows that he is correct, but rewarding for that correctness is only painful and the only minuscule criticism is that the present totalitarian push isn’t really Trump’s. He is the perfectly fitting peg in the carefully carved hole.
I first taught in a city college in the west in the late 1960s; fired for Vietnam war protesting. Wonderful students, good faculty, somewhat overbearing administrators. Then in the regional campus of a dominating midwestern university. I could see the movement away from valuing and supporting academic talent and passion toward cubicle and classroom filling accompanied by obsessive supervision; not so much prescience on my part, more the primitive motive of survival: emotional, intellectual, moral survival. But, I am not surprised at what has come to pass or that the once nascent totalitarianism is using academic institution’s failings driven by a mercantile pragmatism to more easily take them over.
Thank You Chris
That picture above is worth a thousand words.
There are more Semites in Israel than Jews.