Reporter Bullied for Question on Hezbollah

Mick Hall covers the latest skirmish as part of a push by politicians and media to amplify condemnations of the Palestinian resistance and ignore Israel’s escalating and genocidal violence in West Asia.

Liberal Party of Australia leader Peter Dutton, center, at a multinational military exercise led by Australia and the U.S. in 2021 at Camp Growl, Queensland. (Trevor Wild, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

By Mick Hall
Mick Hall in Context

An Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reporter has found herself at the centre of a political storm after she asked Australia’s opposition leader why Hezbollah had been designated a terrorist organisation.

ABC reporter Anushri Sood directed the question to Liberal Party of Australia leader Peter Dutton at a media event on Tuesday. Dutton, visibly riled by the question, asked Sood what media organisation she was from, before repeatedly demanding she repeat the question and then berating her.

“I had presumed up until this point at least the ABC supported the government’s laws and the government has passed laws supported on a bipartisan basis — but obviously not by the ABC it seems — in relation to the proscribing or listing of a terrorist organisation,” Dutton said.

“Hezbollah under Australian law is a proscribed terrorist organisation. Now, if the ABC doesn’t support that it should be very clear about it, because that’s quite a departure. They organise terror attacks. If that is not clear to the ABC then I think they’re in more trouble than even I first imagined.”

Australia had previously proscribed Hezbollah’s External Security Organisation as a terrorist organisation under the Criminal Code in June 2003, before proscribing the entirety of the group in December 2021.

It is understood the reporter was not supported by her newsroom management regarding the question she had asked. Sood’s trade union passed a unanimous motion condemning Dutton’s bullying, as well as the ABC’s response to the incident.

‘A Journalist’s Right & Duty’ 

“It is a journalist’s right and duty to question how policies are made on issues impacting the Australian public and wider global community,” the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) National Media Section committee motion read.

“We support our members’ rights to hold power to account by asking honest and fair questions. The ABC’s public silence on the intimidation of their journalist, a woman of colour, further perpetuates the racism an internal review issued on the same day highlighted.”

The union’s statement comes after an ABC review found racism existed within its organisation and that external groups and individuals had targeted its ethnically diverse staff. The Listen Loudly, Act Strongly report based its findings on interviews with 120 current and former ABC staff. The broadcaster said it accepted the review’s findings and recommendations ‘in principle’.

The ABC was asked by In Context whether management had told Sood her question to Dutton had been inappropriate. The broadcaster was also asked to reply on the union’s claim that the ABC’s response was another example of ethnically-diverse staff having to deal with ABC systemic failure to protect staff when attacked by external groups and individuals. At the time of publication, it had declined to respond.

In December last year, the ABC fired Lebanese-Australian journalist Antoinette Lattouf over a repost on Twitter of a human rights report stating Israel was using hunger as a weapon of war in Gaza. 

Later a series of leaked Whatsapp messages revealed pro-Israel lobbyists had campaigned to get her sacked, although managing director, David Anderson, denied the campaign had any bearing on the sacking.

[See: Australian Journalist Fired After Israel Lobby Push]

Stifling Protest & Speech

The latest ABC skirmish follows repressive moves by other politicians to stifle the right to protest and express political positions amid Israel’s increasing violence and response to it by the so-called Axis of Resistance in West Asia.

At rallies in Melbourne and Sydney last weekend, some marchers carried Hezbollah flags and portraits of the group’s assassinated Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, prompting an investigation by Australian Federal Police after politicians and Zionist groups called for charges to be brought.

Australia passed legislation in January banning Nazi motifs and symbols belonging to listed “terrorist organisations.” 

A 19-year-old woman was charged under the laws on Wednesday for allegedly carrying a Hezbollah flag during the march in Sydney. 

Australian federal police launched a taskforce to investigate at least nine other allegations of prohibited symbols being displayed in Victoria state.

Earlier this week Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong in a statement said that her government condemned “any indication of support for a terrorist organisation such as Hizballah,” adding that it “not only threatens national security, but fuels fear and division in our communities.”

The Australian government’s National Security Statement says

“there are no known specific threats to Australia or Australian interests posed by Hizballah. However, it is possible that Australian interests could be harmed by future attacks.”

Wong’s repressive statement suggesting heterodox views challenging Western narratives and the legitimacy of its terror designations posed a threat to national security, were enthusiastically reported without pushback by the Murdoch press and other mainstream media outlets.

[See: Punishing Pro-Hezbollah Speech]

Hezbollah is a Shia political movement with a powerful military wing, formed following Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon and now makes up part of the Lebanese government. It plays a wider social role in society, as well as acting as a regional ally of Iran as part of a Shia alliance confronting U.S. imperialism in the region. 

[Related: AS’AD AbuKHALIL: The Middle East After Nasrallah]

The group has been a staunch defender of Palestinians and has continued to punish Israel militarily for its genocidal onslaught in Gaza along its southern border with Israel since Oct. 8.

With an estimated 2,000 Lebanese civilians killed by Israel’s indiscriminate bombing and pager terror attacks over the past two weeks, increasingly mirroring what Gazans have faced for nearly a year, media has continued to ignore Israel’s escalating violence and instead amplified voices condemning those supporting resistance groups seeking to end Israel’s genocidal actions in occupied Palestine.

A Palestine solidarity event planned for Oct. 7 in Sydney was also subject to a High Court hearing as police urged it to be banned over safety fears. Politicians had framed the vigil as a celebration of the Hamas attack, instead of a solemn marking of a year-long genocide of Palestinians. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the event would be “incredibly provocative” and “cause a great deal of distress.”

In New Zealand 

New Zealand Labour MP Damien O’Connor in 2021. (Herenga ? Nuku Aotearoa, Flickr, CC BY 2.0)

Moves to make public acts of support for Palestine and resistance to Israel’s illegal occupation and genocidal actions continued across The Ditch.

In New Zealand, a high-profile opposition MP was harangued by media following his Twitter repost in support of Palestinian resistance on same day Sood was bullied.

Radio New Zealand (RNZ) uncritically ran with a story based on spurious attacks by the far-right government coalition partner, the ACT Party, on Labour MP and former trade minister Damien O’Connor.

O’Connor had reposted a speech by Lawrence Wilkerson on X/Twitter, where the retired U.S. colonel said Palestinians had a right to attack Israel on Oct. 7.

Act spokesman Simon Court demanded O’Connor apologise or be stripped of his associate spokesperson on foreign affairs party role, calling his repost “extreme and hateful.” O’Connor subsequently took the post down.

RNZ quoted Act’s Simon Court as saying Hamas killed over 1,000 people and had “committed atrocities on a scale not seen since the Holocaust in World War II.”

It reported him claiming O’Connor was “saying things that are essentially the promotion of terrorism and a pogrom.”

Hamas killed at least 376 security force members on Oct. 7, while 767 civilians were also killed, according to news agency AFP. It has been acknowledged within Israeli and some Western legacy media outlets that Israel invoked its Hannibal Directive and killed possibly hundreds of the 767 civilians who lost their lives.

RNZ did not challenge the veracity of Court’s claims within its story. It ran with the Israeli disinformation that Hamas killed “more than 1100 people and kidnapping about 250 more, according to Israeli tallies.”

The broadcaster also requested a response from Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who said no further action was being taken after O’Connor had acknowledged it was a mistake to post Wilkerson’s remarks.

ACT is a Zionist party whose party leader David Seymour requested that Foreign Minister Winston Peters consult him on New Zealand’s position on Israel before making significant decisions on it.

Seymour speaking in Palmerston North in July 2023. (Glenn Davies, Wikipedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) national chairman John Minto said New Zealand journalism had reached “new lows of racism and complicity with genocide in the past week with the uncritical broadcast of the most blatant Israeli propaganda.”

Minto said RNZ and the country’s other national broadcaster, Television New Zealand, like the rest of Western media outlets, were repeating politicians’ hypocrisy in falsely framing resistance groups’ actions as the problem.

Peters condemned Iran’s attack on Israeli military and intelligence installations with up to 200 ballistic and hypersonic missiles on Wednesday (NZT), as an unacceptable escalation, following several provocations by Israel against its neighbour. Regional war looms as Israel voices its intent to attack Iran again in response, while it continued to bomb Syria, Lebanon and Gaza this week.

“It’s unbelievable — as though attacks by Hezbollah were the problem rather than 76 years of Israeli massacres, ethnic cleansing and a brutal military occupation,” Minto said.

“It is clear to the rest of the world, if not RNZ, that Israel has been deliberately trying to provoke a wider war in the Middle East but no-one listening or watching our state broadcasters would be any the wiser. While the people of the world want Israel to stop the carnage, TVNZ and RNZ are all but egging it on.”

As well as the assassination of Nasrallah and several senior Hezbollah and Iranian military figures, Israel killed Hamas chief negotiator Ismail Haniyeh in his Tehran hotel room in July.

An Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria that killed 16 people, including eight of Iran’s top Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), precipitated an earlier missile attack by Iran against Israel in April.

Meanwhile, Minto has criticised a decision by Stuff, one of the country’s largest private news outlets, not to run a paid-for full-page advertisement by the PSNA. It lists genocidal statements by Israeli leaders and contains facts about the Gaza death toll and levels of devastation.

“At this stage Stuff has given no official reason for banning the ad, aside from saying they won’t do so ‘while the ongoing conflict is developing.’ It seems that for Stuff, pro-Israel sympathies are more important that Palestinian realities.”

Stuff has been contacted for comment.

Mick Hall is an independent journalist based in New Zealand. He is a former digital journalist at Radio New Zealand (RNZ) and former Australian Associated Press (AAP) staffer, having also written investigative stories for various newspapers, including the New Zealand Herald.

This article is from the author’s Substack, Mick Hall in Context.

Views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Please Donate Today to CN’s Fall Fund Drive 

 



11 comments for “Reporter Bullied for Question on Hezbollah

  1. mark stanley
    October 5, 2024 at 13:18

    “Define ‘Terrorism.'”
    Perhaps that would be a question the journalist could ask the politician.
    Wikipedia’s take on the term is sketchy: “Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.”
    And: “There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.”
    That’s convenient.
    I will take a stab at it:
    One sovereign country attacking another sovereign country without a formal declaration of war is Terrorism.
    That’s uncomfortably inconvenient.

    • Graeme
      October 7, 2024 at 00:38

      41,870 Killed – at a bare minimum, possibly 4 times that;
      97,166 Wounded;
      11,000 Missing;
      42 million tonnes of rubble;
      An entire nation of refugees.

      All done as part of an on-going genocide; as defined by Francesca Albanese.

      “Define ‘Terrorism.?”
      In this case it has a name: the IDF.

      Investigating war crimes in Gaza I Al Jazeera Investigations
      hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPE6vbKix6A

      The context for October 7 is wilfully and deliberately ignored
      By John Menadue
      hxxps://johnmenadue.com/hamas-gaza-and-the-continuing-zionist-project/

  2. Larry McGovern
    October 5, 2024 at 12:38

    Thank you Mick Hall. I hope they don’t come to “get you”, but if they do, maybe Julian Assange your Aussie neighbor, and newly “resurfaced” at the Council of Europe this week (but still recovering from his tortuous, 14 year ordeal), will come to your aid!

  3. Andrew Nichols
    October 5, 2024 at 04:25

    It’s only in the moral cesspit Rules Based International Order of the WesternMinority World where it is more offensive to oppose Genocide than the Genocide itself. This degenerate state is the beginning of the end for US/WMW hegemony. The latter part of Numbers 32:23 of the Bible says it well “you may be sure that your sin will find you out.”

  4. Oregoncharles
    October 4, 2024 at 16:53

    He was actually dodging a question he obviously couldn’t answer, so his remarks are as much a self-own, a confession of ignorance, as they are bullying.

    Good for her for asking.

    Incidentally, weaponizing consumer items – the pagers and walkie-talkies – is a serious war crime, as well as clearly terrorism.

    • October 5, 2024 at 13:58

      That wasn’t even a “gotcha” question–I could see reporters asking questions like that about policies they AGREE with.

      It could be just laziness, but I suspect he knew whatever answer he gave, even if true, would not justify what Israel is doing.

  5. October 4, 2024 at 16:43

    Bloody Aussies are getting as bad as the U.S.

    • Roger Hoffmann
      October 4, 2024 at 23:47

      I didn’t think it possible, but it certainly looks that way. The lack of any defined freedom of speech, and parallel views by the mainstream press seem to be emboldening the authoritarian war-mongers to ramp up attacks on anyone daring to challenge or even ask the logical questions such as that posed by Anushri Sood.
      These Nazis will eventually be held to account… and notwithstanding my non-violent principles and desire to be forgiving, I don’t think I’d ever be able to defend assholes like Dutton, et al, if and when they are finally brought to account.

  6. Jean Gingras
    October 4, 2024 at 16:41

    Very good article. Unfortunately not going anywhere, but that’s the fate of anything challenging western narratives.
    As Goering would say (I’m paraphrasing), portraying adversaries as unpatriotic is an effective way of shutting down opposition.

  7. mgr
    October 4, 2024 at 14:10

    The Western support for Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza and now Lebanon make it the outlier in world opinion. Not repudiating evil and not stopping it when you can , not to mention enabling it, is the same as embracing it. These US vassal states like Australia are following the US and Israel right into hell. Watch as their democracies and societies begin to unravel. Cynical and self-serving immorality will do that. Western leaders in general are beyond pathetic. The effects of decades of incompetent and self-serving leaders and “democracies” in which the people have no say are coming home to roost.

    • Megan Baker
      October 5, 2024 at 02:58

      Well said! It’s astonishing to me that I was so ignorant, before October of last year, of the remarkable hold Israel has over the west given the extent and strength of that hold. I must have been living in a bubble. Now I’m making up for all the anger I didn’t have about it all those years; some days I can barely contain it. Consortium News has helped keep me sane, not to mention comments like yours, from people who insist on calling a genocide a genocide. I agree that official support for Israel will come to haunt societies like the U.S., just as the racism and inherent aggressiveness of Zionism is tearing Israeli society apart. I take a lot of pleasure in seeing the latter, knowing that Israel is likely to implode before pols like Kamala Harris and Peter Dutton give up their Israel lobby largesse.

Comments are closed.