The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco dismissed the Center for Constitutional Law case seeking to stop the Biden administration from aiding Israel’s bombardment of Gaza.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, President Joe Biden and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at a press event in January 2023. (White House, Cameron Smith)
By Brett Wilkins
Common Dreams
Palestine defenders on Tuesday decried a U.S. federal appellate panel’s dismissal of a case brought by Palestinians accusing senior Biden administration officials of failing to prevent and complicity in Israeli genocide in Gaza.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit against President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, which was led by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) on behalf of several Palestinian groups and individuals.
During a Tuesday interview on Democracy Now!, CCR attorney Katherine Gallagher — who represented plaintiffs in the case — said its dismissal “essentially gives the blank check to carry out any kind of conduct that the executive wants in times of genocide, in times of war.”
US Court affirms that #Genocide is a permitted foreign policy choice for the @POTUS.
Hiding behind the Political Question Doctrine, the Court has alarmingly abdicated its role to serve as a check on the Executive, even when it's failing to prevent and is complicit in #Genocide. https://t.co/o7y2qihbgj
— Ahmed Abofoul | ???? ??? ??? (@AhmedAbofoul) July 16, 2024
Gallagher’s interview followed a Monday statement in which she referred to the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling granting the president “absolute immunity” for “official acts.”
“On the heels of Trump v. United States, this stunning abdication of the court’s role to serve as a check on the executive even in the face of its support for genocide should set off alarm bells for all,” she said.
The lawsuit — originally filed in November in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland — sought to stop the Biden administration from aiding Israel’s bombardment of Gaza.
U.S. weapons have played a critical role in Israel’s war, which Palestinian and international agencies say has killed, wounded or left missing more than 137,500 Gazans.
While the court found that “the current treatment of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip by the Israeli military may plausibly constitute a genocide in violation of international law,” it dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds in late January. The 9th Circuit subsequently granted an expedited appeal in the case, which was heard in June.
“This decision is mind-boggling and, frankly, scary,” plaintiff Waeil Elbhassi said in a statement Monday. “It is just unfathomable, while we count our dead, witness the total obliteration of Gaza — aided by our own government.”
“As the death toll keeps rising and we see nonstop images of carnage during this livestreamed genocide, the court washes its hands of our case,” Elbhassi added. He said:
“We turned to the law to help stop the horror, and the court chose to do nothing. We are beyond disappointed. We have no choice but to continue to fight for our people. Our very existence is at stake.”
Israel’s conduct in Gaza — including alleged forced starvation that has fueled deadly famine in parts of the besieged strip — is under investigation by the International Court of Justice in a genocide case brought by South Africa.
Additionally, International Criminal Court Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan has applied for warrants to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders for crimes including extermination allegedly committed on and after Oct. 7.
Brett Wilkins is a staff writer for Common Dreams.
This article is from Common Dreams.
Views expressed in this article and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.
Why was this case fought in the 9th District??? It is third behind the D.C. Circuit and Southern District of New York in its protection of the unconstitutional exercise of federal power. Surely, there must have been plaintiffs available from more Constitutionally friendly districts. It’s hard to believe a major public interest law firm like CCR would not carefully choose the venue for such a case.
Well, surprise, surprise! You didn’t seriously expect a US court to insist that the US government obeyed our own laws, now would you? That would make us a nation of laws. But we’re actually a nation of rules and one of the rules in the US’s rules based order is that the US is never wrong……
If the Repugs actually wanted to impeach Genocide Joe they would just charge him under the Leahy Laws, which prohibit supplying weapons to organizations committing war crimes. That they don’t just shows that the entire process is nothing but show. They may as well sing and dance while they’re at it.
Yeah, let’s take away free speech and ban social media but enable Israel and Genocide Joe – what a bunch of shit!
That is ridiculous. Bomber Joe, Genocide Joe, are two good names for him. But the courts always want to cover high people in office.
It’s not surprising. The Political Question Doctrine is well established. The attorney for the State Department said, at the original hearing, that the US has its own law for this, a criminal law that is the sole recourse.
Given the recent decision from SCOTUS, even that law, 18 U.S. Code § 1091, would seem to be inapplicable to Biden. OTOH, members of his administration may be subject to being charged.
Going to a court of law seeking justice is a conflation of two quite separate concepts. We keep doing it, but the results are all too often disappointing.
An example of what’s wrong with this country in a nutshell. Our economy is a war economy, mainly thanks to the DNC. Weapons sold and money given to errant countries is odious, but, hey, it makes the money-makers happy, the hell with humanity.