A Pan-Africa Response to the ‘New’ Imperialism

The continent’s political liberation and economic emancipation can’t be one-country affairs, but pan-African combined with international solidarity, writes P. Anyang’ Nyong’o. 

Boulevard Tanimoune in Niamey, Niger, 2019. (NigerTZai, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)

By P. Anyang’ Nyong’o
Africa is a Country

A new imperialism stalks the Third World. It shares with the old an unquenchable thirst — for its labor, its land, its minerals, and its water. If colonization depended on the political strategies of divide and rule, the imperialists no longer have to rule today. Instead, they rely on local elites eager to aid their peoples’ exploitation in return for a share of the spoils — a process sanitized with the language of investments, trade deals and partnerships.

That imperialism would find a way to become more efficient, not less, was not inevitable. At the 1945 Pan-African Congress in Manchester, England, the declaration was clear: “We welcome economic democracy as the only real democracy.” As pan-Africanism gained prominence, intellectuals like W.E.B. Du Bois, alongside political actors, workers, and peasants, endorsed the unity of the African people for the purpose of liberation from political oppression and emancipation from economic exploitation.

Three future African presidents were at the 1945 conference: Hastings Kamuzu Banda of Malawi, Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya, and Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana. All three men led their nations to independence but encountered different fortunes. Banda and Kenyatta, happy to side with the imperialists once in office, ruled their countries until death did them part. Nkrumah, like the pan-Africanist Milton Obote of Uganda much later, faced hostile domestic forces supported by the West — and was removed from power.

The loss of leaders like Nkrumah was part of a gruesome period of assassinations and mysterious killings that eliminated pan-Africanists and anti-imperialist intellectuals across the world.

Another conference in Accra bore witness to the election of Thomas Joseph Mboya of Kenya, as the chairman of the first All African Peoples’ Conference (AAPC). At the age of 28, Mboya flew to the U.S. to win the support of Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy for the famous “airlift” of Kenyan students to access higher education there. All three leaders fell to the assassin’s bullet: Mboya and King for standing against the imperialists, and Kennedy for standing with the civil rights movement.

Plaque on the building in Manchester, England, commemorating the Fifth Pan African Conference – 1945. (Nick Harrison, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

“While revolutionaries as individuals can be murdered,” said Thomas Sankara, the pan-Africanist president of Burkina Faso, “you cannot kill ideas.” Sankara’s words would turn out to be tragically prophetic.

Hailed as “the new Nkrumah,” Sankara threatened the stranglehold that French imperialism had on West Africa by pushing for pan-Africanism and resisting the illegitimate debts that kept African nations subordinate to imperialist financiers. He too, was assassinated in 1987 in a coup backed by France and the US Whenever Africa has tried to forge her own future, she has been thwarted.

During the Covid-19 crisis, Africa depended entirely on the Western world for its future, exposing the fragility of the continent in the global political and economic order. Super highways, giant factories, and billionaires stood no chance against a raging virus. Why is it that a small island like Cuba, with only 11 million people and sugar cane as its main agricultural endowment, could respond to Covid-19 much more effectively than the whole of Africa? The answer is simple: While Africa looked to the West for the import of vaccines, Cuba produced three of its own and offered to share them with other nations.

When the U.S. tried to isolate Cuba from the rest of the world through sanctions, Cuba turned towards its own people. By emphasizing self-reliance, Cuba developed its medicine and bio-technology industries, while centering medical internationalism.

That is the example for Africa. It is not countries or governments that need to be liberated, it is people living in various countries under various political regimes that need to be liberated so they can live with freedom, dignity, and equality. In fact, only Africans can be their own liberators through trade unions, mutual aid groups, social movements, and political parties.

The Progressive International’s Council, whose declaration clearly states that internationalism means anti-imperialism, states: “Our internationalism stands against imperialism in all its forms: from war and sanctions to privatization and ‘structural adjustment.’ These are not only tools of domination by some nations over others but are also the tools of division to set the peoples of the world against each other.”

The political and economic liberation of the African people cannot be a one-country affair. By necessity it must be a pan-African movement with international solidarity with progressive social forces. This, too, is the only viable way by which regional and continental economic and political integration can be achieved.

Peter Anyang’ Nyong’o is a Kenyan politician and author who is also the current governor of Kisumu County.

This article is from Africa is a Country and is republished under a creative commons license.

The views expressed are solely those of the authors and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

5 comments for “A Pan-Africa Response to the ‘New’ Imperialism

  1. August 9, 2022 at 10:37

    Isn’t it strange that nations like China, Cuba, Russia, and so many other “Third World” nations are fighting for social justice while western nations, led by the U.S. continue full steam-ahead for, as stated in the article: “Hailed as “the new Nkrumah,” Sankara threatened the stranglehold that French imperialism had on West Africa by pushing for pan-Africanism and resisting the illegitimate debts that kept African nations subordinate to imperialist financiers. He too, was assassinated in 1987 in a coup backed by France and the US Whenever Africa has tried to forge her own future, she has been thwarted.”

  2. Anna
    August 9, 2022 at 05:29

    We, in Africa survived covid far better than any other country!!! Death rates were far lower than anywhere else – lots of theories about that, but the author falls flat on his face asserting that we needed the west and that covid exposed our fragility!!!??!!
    If anything, it exposed the common people’s common sense. Regardless of the politicians and their emergency laws which the weak-kneed politicians swallowed wholesale from the WHO and big capital interests, common people knew that it is safer to be outside in the sunny streets, instead of being locked up in a shack rebreathing each other’s air; that a less than 1% death rate means the risk of the disease is smaller than the risks posed by experimental technology, so we, in Africa, also had the lowest rate of vaccination.
    Although I agree with the statement of the author in the first paragraph, he quickly wanders off into the hook-thorn-bush.

  3. Hegesias
    August 8, 2022 at 16:49

    Strange that he doesn’t mention Hillary’s murder of the pan-Africanist Gaddafi.

    • August 9, 2022 at 10:40

      Hegesias, I don’t think it was intentional but great point as pan-Africanist Gaddafi was heading in the right direction as to ending imperialism in greater Africa, including North Africa.

  4. Caroline
    August 8, 2022 at 16:44

    Excellent article. ” It is not countries or governments that need to be liberated, it is people living in various countries under various political regimes that need to be liberated so they can live with freedom, dignity, and equality. In fact, only Africans can be their own liberators through trade unions, mutual aid groups, social movements, and political parties.” Yes indeed, let’s make it so. Thank you.

Comments are closed.