JOHN KIRIAKOU: The Formula for Sentencing Derek Chauvin

No matter how much time Chauvin gets, he’s going to spend all of it in solitary confinement.

George Floyd Memorial at Chicago Avenue & 38th Street, Minneapolis, May 30, 2020. (Fibonacci Blue/Wikimedia Commons)

By John Kiriakou
Special to Consortium News

When former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd on April 20, his bail was revoked, he was handcuffed, he was taken into custody and sent to a prison in Stillwater, Minnesota. A police spokesman told the media Chauvin was being held in solitary confinement for his own safety. Most of us won’t give him much more thought until his name pops up in the news again for his sentencing in June.

There’s actually a lot to talk about, though. First, is how long will Chauvin’s sentence be and how it will be calculated? Second, is in what conditions will he be held over the long term? Both issues are more complicated than they might seem.

Chauvin was convicted of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter. He faces as many as 45 years in prison, although state sentencing guidelines call for 12 ½ years because the murder of Floyd is Chauvin’s “first offense.” There’s a big difference between 12 ½ and 45 years. So how will such a decision be made?

All states, like the federal government, have complicated charts that show categories of “criminal history” and levels of the severity of crimes. Take a look at the federal chart here.

A judge would first look at the Criminal History Category, which goes from I through VI. If a person has no criminal history or has been convicted only of misdemeanors previously, he or she would have a criminal history of I. Conversely, a career criminal, somebody who has been convicted of a multitude of serious crimes, would have a criminal history of VI. It’s under “Offense Level,” the left-hand column, where deals are made.

Chauvin’s three convictions are a result of a single crime, the murder of George Floyd. So his sentences will almost certainly be served concurrently. That is, he will serve sentences for all three crimes at the same time, rather than having to serve one after the other. The most serious crime, second-degree murder, is a criminal level of 32 on the sentencing chart. That calls for 121-151 months in prison. But that’s just a baseline. Myriad factors could change it to make it either longer or shorter.

First, the prosecution will argue that Chauvin has never taken responsibility for his crime. That’s a one-level enhancement. They will argue that he has a violent history; citizens have made 17 separate complaints against him for excessive use of force during his years as a police officer. That’s another one-level enhancement. They will argue that a nine-year-old girl was in the back seat of the car when Chauvin killed Floyd. That’s at least another one-level enhancement. Those enhancements would raise the criminal level to 35, which in turn calls for a sentence of 168-210 months.

On the other hand, the defense will offer evidence of “mitigation,” which would shorten the sentence. They could argue that perhaps Chauvin was abused as a child. Perhaps he has a drinking problem. They could argue that the drugs that Floyd had in his system contributed to his death. Mitigation is unlikely in such a high-profile case.

Thousands march on March 7, the day before the start of jury selection in the Derek Chauvin murder trial in Minneapolis. (Chad Davis/Wikimedia Commons)

At the end of the day, the final decision on sentencing belongs to the judge. If I could make an educated guess, I would say that the minimum of 12 ½ years is not going to happen. There are legitimate enhancements. Chauvin is probably looking at something closer to 15-20 years.

No matter how much time Chauvin gets, he’s going to spend all of it in solitary confinement. In almost any other circumstance, when a law enforcement officer is convicted of a crime and sentenced to prison, he is assigned to solitary for his own safety. In a prison’s general population, any number of people could be expected to do a former cop harm. Not only is Chauvin a former cop, though. He’s an internationally infamous murderer. He wouldn’t last five minutes in gen pop.

The United Nations has declared the way in which the United States uses solitary confinement as a form of torture. Believe me—it is torture. Chauvin will be devoid of human contact. He’ll be allowed to “exercise” by walking in circles in a six-by-ten foot outdoor cage for one hour a day. He’ll be allowed two 15-minute showers a week. He’ll be allowed to use the phone once a month, but only to speak to his attorneys. He’ll be allowed visitors, but only his attorneys and closest family members, and that will be from behind glass and with the use of an intercom phone. This will be for whatever the length of his sentence is.

Derek Chauvin will not get any special treatment in prison because he’s a former cop. On the contrary, his will be hard time. He’ll spend the coming decades either truly alone or looking over his shoulder to see if anybody is coming to kill him. Those of us who wished to see him punished for his crime have gotten what we wanted.

John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act—a law designed to punish spies. He served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration’s torture program.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Please Support Our
Spring Fund Drive!

Donate securely with PayPal


Or securely by credit card or check by clicking the red button:



3 comments for “JOHN KIRIAKOU: The Formula for Sentencing Derek Chauvin

  1. Joe Blow
    May 5, 2021 at 12:17

    He won’t get his until a prison guard looks the other way for 5 minutes. But the truth is he’ll be on probation in a year, He got over a million dollars from crowd sourcing and US courts respond to raw money much more than justice. Just ask the last 1000’s of banking executives that plead guilty to million dollar frauds and pay a fine and walk.

    • James Simpson
      May 6, 2021 at 02:04

      Your “truth” is cynicism without basis in reality. I doubt he’ll be out of prison for at least a couple of decades. We’ll see.

  2. Jeff Harrison
    May 5, 2021 at 12:04

    Thanx for the info, John. But really, he’s got to get to prison first. He’s asking for a new trial. I don’t have a lot of faith in the American criminal system.

Comments are closed.