US and Iranian Hardliners Continue the Suffering

Ann Wright reports on a citizen peace delegation’s recent trip to Iran, which included a meeting with the country’s foreign minister.

By Ann Wright
Special to Consortium News

We knew that a CODEPINK: Women for Peace delegation to Iran would wind up in the crosshairs of the Trump administration.  While he was campaigning, Donald Trump made his animosity toward Iran very clear by referring to the Obama administration’s nuclear agreement with Iran as the “worst deal ever.”

Despite the International Atomic Energy Agency’s evidence that Tehran was complying with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, one of Trump’s first actions upon becoming president was pulling the U.S. out of the treaty and imposing brutal sanctions on the people of Iran.

These sanctions have resulted in the slashing of purchasing power of the national currency by two-thirds. We knew that U.S citizens going to Iran to talk with Iranians about the impact of the sanctions would not be popular with the Trump administration.

 Ministers of Germany, U. K., China, U. S, France, Russia, the European Union and Iran in Geneva for the interim agreement on the Iranian nuclear program, November 2013. (Wikimedia)

Foreign ministers in Geneva for interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program,  2013. (Wikimedia)

Despite the visas that Tehran issued to our delegation, we knew our  delegation would also be under Iranian scrutiny while we were there.  American journalists, IT professionals, retired UN officials and retired and former U.S. government officials have been imprisoned.

Despite such considerations, our group still takes these trips. We endure the suspicions of governments to travel as citizen diplomats to areas of the world where our government does not want us to see the effects of U.S. policies on the lives of people in targeted countries.

As citizen diplomats, we have been labeled as “naïve tools of repressive governments” when we visited Iran, North Korea, Gaza, Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen, countries where U.S. interference, invasion, occupation or support for other countries’ wars, have made life miserable and dangerous for their citizens.  We encounter ordinary citizens who are concerned about the future of their children, their health and education because of military conflict or sanctions touted as a humane substitute for military conflict. We return with their stories, determined to resolve whatever political disagreement is occurring between the U.S. and the particular country.

The Knives Were Out

The knives of journalists and pundits were out for Women Cross the DMZ in 2015 when we — 30 women from 15 countries, including two Nobel Peace Laureates — returned from North Korea after holding a peace conference with 250 North Korean women and peace marches with 5,000 women in Pyongyang and 2,000 women in Kaesong.

The anti-Semitism label was thrown at us when we visited Israeli-blockaded Gaza and witnessed the illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land in the West Bank and dared to speak and write about them.  We were called the tool of the Pakistani Taliban when we talked with families of civilians assassinated by U.S. drones in the border area of Pakistan-Afghanistan.

Our delegation’s meeting with the foreign minister of Iran has already provoked harsh words from U.S. and Israeli media of collaborating with the Iranian government and FBI warning us about being agents of a foreign government.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif with CODEPINK delegation. (Ann Wright)

Minister Zarif with CODEPINK delegation. (Ann Wright)

In the nine days we were in Iran, from Feb. 26 to March 6, we talked with Iranians in schools, bazaars and markets, on squares and in mosques.  Many people in Iran speak English. English is taught from elementary school.  Young students ran up to us to practice their English.  The Trump administration’s travel ban on Iranians means that students who have been accepted to U.S. universities cannot get student visas to study in the U.S. Families with members in the U.S. cannot visit them. Iranians are turning to Europe and Asia.  The U.S. travel ban on Iran and the six other countries may have been intended to isolate Iran, but instead America is isolating itself.

A surprising number of people, particularly outside of Tehran, the capital, spoke openly about their disagreements with their own government. 

‘We Like You, Not Your Government’

At a museum in Isfahan we talked with other visitors who were Iranian. Spotting small banners pinned to our backs that read “Peace with Iran” in English and Farsi, people came up to us, invariably beginning with, “We like Americans, but we don’t like your government.” Many of them added, “and we don’t like our government either.”  The reasons that we heard for disliking their own government included graft, corruption, those in power living the high life, too much money spent on other countries which should be used at home, mistakenly trusting the United States to lessen or end the sanctions after signing the nuclear agreement.

Iranians we met were open about the effect of the latest stringent U.S. sanctions on their daily life.  The U.S- sponsored closure of Iran’s access to the international financial system means that ordinary businesses have less access to funds to purchase goods.   Apps on mobile phones for paying bills or arranging for car-share rides no longer function. Marriages are postponed as families lack money for the obligatory dowries and wedding celebrations. Purchases of big-ticket items of everything from refrigerators to cars are delayed due to the hyper-inflation of the rial, Iranian currency.

From the foreign minister to the ordinary Iranians we met, all reminded us with great pride of the 2,500-year history of their country.  Many spoke of the pressures from neighboring countries and destructive wars waged by neighbors and by countries from afar: the United States, Britain and Russia.

Seven countries are direct neighbors: Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Armenia.  Seven more are within 100 miles: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen. Three more are within 300 miles: Georgia, Russia and Uzbekistan.

By contrast, only Canada and Mexico directly border the U.S. and its possessions and only a few countries are within 100 miles: the Bahamas, Cuba and Russia across the Bering Sea, as Alaska geography expert Sarah Palin famously reminded us with her “I can see Russia from here” comment.

In the past 25 years, from the 1991 Gulf War onwards, the U.S. has been involved in military conflict in six of the countries surrounding Iran: Kuwait, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Hundreds of thousands have died from U.S. military wars in the region. Two million Iraqis and 3 million Syrians have fled U.S.-sponsored violence and are now refugees in other countries in the region.

From 1980 to 1988, the U.S. supported Iraq with intelligence and chemical weapons in its horrific eight-year war on Iran, which began one year after the Iranian revolution overthrew the U.S. backed government of the Shah of Iran.  The Shah had come to power as a result of the American-Anglo orchestrated overthrow of the elected president of Iran in 1953.

Massive Cemetery

On the way from Tehran to Isfahan, we were asked to visit the massive cemetery outside of Tehran with the graves of tens of thousands of Iranians killed during the Iraqi war on Iran. It is estimated that one million Iranians died defending their country from the Iraqi attacks and that between 250,000-500,000 Iraqis died. The road leading to the cemetery has flower stands along the route for visitors to arrive with flowers to place on the graves. Thousands of Iranians visit the cemetery each day.  We spoke with one older woman who said she comes to the cemetery each day as all of her sons are buried here.  The entire country including very young kids were mobilized to stop the Iraqi invasion of Iran.

Markers in cemetery outside Tehran. (Ann Wright)

Markers in cemetery outside Tehran. (Ann Wright)

The cemetery is the equivalent of Arlington National cemetery outside of Washington, D.C., where many international guests visit to see the history of the United States through the graves of those who were killed in many U.S. wars.

U.S. bases starred.

The  U.S. military bases surrounding Iran are a constant reminder of the U.S. military threat. U.S. combat aircraft and drones fly daily from U.S. air bases in the region.  Not shown on the map are the fleet of U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships that since the 1970s have had a permanent presence in the waters off the coast of Iran in the Persian Gulf.

One incident weighs on the minds of Iranians, much as the events of 9/11 do on Americans. On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes, a U.S. guided-missile cruiser, used two radar-guided missiles to shoot down an Iranian civilian passenger aircraft, Iran Air flight 655, that had taken off from the coastal city of Bandar Abbas, Iran.  The flight was still climbing on its regularly scheduled flight to Dubai when it was blown to pieces.  Iran Air flight 655 was still in Iranian airspace, on its prescribed routine daily flight route on established air lanes, emitting by radio the standard commercial identifying data when the missiles struck. Two hundred and ninety passengers and crew, including 66 children, were killed.

Earlier in the day on July 3, 1988, the captain of the USS Vincennes, Will Rogers III, had sunk in Iranian waters, two Iranian gunboats and damaged a third. Captain David Carlson of the U.S. Navy frigate “Sides” that was also on patrol in the Persian Gulf, later told investigators that the destruction of the airliner by the missiles of the USS Vincennes “marked the horrifying climax to Rogers’ aggressiveness.” Incredibly, in 1990, Rogers was awarded the Legion of Merit decoration “for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service as commanding officer … from April 1987 to May 1989.” The citation made no mention of the shoot-down of Iran Air 655.

‘Never Apologize’

As vice president, George H.W. Bush argued at the United Nations that the U.S. attack on Iranian Airbus flight 655 had been a wartime incident and that the crew had acted appropriately to the situation at the time. He famously and tragically said: “I’ll never apologize for the United States of America, ever. I don’t care what the facts are.” It was not until 1996 that the U.S. agreed to a $132 million out-of-court settlement in a case brought by Iran in 1989 against the U.S. in the International Court of Justice. The U.S. paid additional compensation for the 38 non-Iranian deaths.

While the vice president of the United States would not make an apology to the people of Iran, our delegation did.

Barbara Briggs-Letson presenting the book to Tehran Peace Museum Director Taghipour and Peace Education Department & Translator Yalda Khosravi. (Jodie Evans)

Barbara Briggs-Letson presenting  book to Tehran Peace Museum Director Taghipour and the Peace Education Department’s Yalda Khosravi. (Jodie Evans)

Barbara Briggs-Letson, a member of our delegation, created a beautiful book expressing our heartfelt remorse. It contains several poems and the name of each person on the flight written in Farsi.  We showed the book to Foreign Minister Zarif during our meeting with him and he was very moved by our gesture.  A few days later, we gave the book to the Tehran Peace Museum where it will be on permanent display.

The effect of U.S. sanctions on Iran, particularly in the medical field, were brought home to us vividly by people who told us of family members who have died because they were unable to get proper treatment with the most efficient drugs due to sanctions.

Sanctions Block Medical Equipment

Dialysis patients who could be helped by state-of-the-art equipment from Europe or the U.S. are denied that equipment by the sanctions.  The financial sanctions block purchase of medicines and medical equipment.   Insurance companies in the U.S. and Europe are blocked from paying directly to hospitals medical bills of citizens who need emergency medical care.

David Hartsough in Tehran hospital.

David Hartsough in Tehran hospital. (Hospital staff)

While in Iran, a member of our own delegation had chest pains and was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with heart artery blockage.  His family in the U.S., the medical doctor in Iran and a medical doctor on our delegation recommended that he not try to return to the U.S. without determining the extent of blockage and that he have an angioplasty procedure in Iran.  The angioplasty showed dangerous blockage of three arteries. Stents made in the United States were placed in his arteries during the angioplasty procedure to open up the arteries.  He would not have been able to travel safely back to the U.S. without the stents.

When the family and the U.S. Interests Section at the Swiss Embassy contacted the patient’s insurance carrier, Kaiser Permanente, they were told that due to the sanctions, the insurance company could not pay the Iranian hospital directly, but the patient could be reimbursed after his return to the United States.  The U.S. Embassy in Switzerland made a loan through the U.S. Interests section at the Swiss Embassy in Tehran to pay for the medical procedure, which the patient will repay.

Sanctions were a topic of discussion when we had the opportunity to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.  In a 90-minute talk on our first morning in Tehran, Zarif reminded us that that Iran’s 80 million people have lived for the past 40 years under some level of U.S. sanctions.  U.S. sanctions on Iran began soon after the 1979 revolution and the student seizure of the U.S. Embassy and holding of 52 U.S. diplomats for 444 days.

Zarif told our delegation: “…the U.S. difficulty with Iran is not because of the region, not because of human rights, not because of weapons, not because of the nuclear issue – it’s just because we decided to be independent – that’s it – that’s our biggest crime.  Iranians are resilient people who will resist the arbitrary actions of the Trump administration in dumping the nuclear agreement and intimidating European partners from honoring the commitments of the agreement to loosening sanctions.”

Zarif said that Iran had worked with the United States in the days after 9/11 to provide information on the Taliban, al Qaeda and other groups in Afghanistan.  Iranian cooperation was “rewarded” three months later by the Bush administration, no doubt led by National Security Advisor John Bolton, with placement on Bush’s Axis of Evil list: Iran, Iraq and North Korea.

In an overview of military budgets and spending, he said Saudi Arabia spends $67 billion buying weapons from the U.S.  “Last year, the West sold $100 billion of weaponry to GCC countries – these small emirates in the Persian Gulf.  The entire population of these countries, I don’t think would reach 40 million.   A hundred billion dollars in weapons.  I don’t, I don’t believe with all due respect they know how to use them. Because they have not been able to defeat basically defenseless people in Yemen. For four years.  The war in Yemen, this April, will be 4-years-old.”

Yemen Ceasefire Efforts

Zarif also spoke of his efforts with the U.S. in 2015 to broker a ceasefire to stop the brutal Saudi bombing and blockade on Yemen. The Saudis, after first agreeing to a ceasefire, backed out of the agreement and then the United States, he said, blamed Iran, not Saudi Arabia.

“When the war started, I was involved in the most difficult stage of the negotiations on the nuclear case.  Because if you remember in 2015, Congress set a deadline that unless we had a framework agreement on the nuclear issue by April first, Congress would impose sanctions that the U.S. administration would not be able to waive.  We were running against a deadline in Lausanne (Switzerland) when we had that stage of negotiations. And yet, John Kerry and I spent two days from that precious time talking about how to end the war in Yemen although that was not my mandate, but I thought the war in Yemen was so disastrous that we should bring it to an end.”

Secretary Kerry shakes hands with and bids goodbye to Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif at the Austria Center in Vienna, July 14, 2015, after Zarif read a declaration of the nuclear agreement in his native Farsi. (State Department)

 Kerry and Zarif bid goodbye at the Austria Center in Vienna, July 14, 2015, after a declaration of the nuclear agreement. (State Department)

Zarif continued, “John Kerry and I reached an understanding that we need to end this war. At that time the current minister of state of Saudi Arabia, Adel al-Jubeir, was U.S. ambassador—Saudi ambassador to the U.S.  After we reached an agreement on April second or third, John Kerry went back to Washington and talked to Adel al-Jubeir. He went back to Saudi Arabia and got an OK for a ceasefire in Yemen. And he informed me that we can have a ceasefire.  I immediately contacted the Houthis and got them to agree to a ceasefire. This is April 2015.  In a few days it will be four years.”

He added, “Then I was boarding a plane to Indonesia…I told my deputy – wait for a call from Secretary Kerry, he’ll tell you that the final agreement has arrived.  We arrived in Indonesia eight hours later, I called Secretary Kerry and said what happened?  He said, ‘Saudis reneged, because they believed they could have a military victory in three weeks.’  I told him they won’t be able to have a military victory, not in three weeks, not in three months, not in three years. But he said, ‘what can I do?  I’m fed up with them, they won’t budge.” I said, ‘Fine, we tried.’ ”

Zarif shook his head and said, “The next day, the very next day, President Obama, of all people, made a public statement accusing Iran of interfering in Yemen.  The very next day.  I told them, OK – you couldn’t get it (the ceasefire) from your allies, why are you blaming us?  You don’t want to blame your allies, fine – but, why are you blaming us?”

Much to our surprise, Zarif resigned as foreign minister only a few hours after speaking to our delegation.  Reportedly, he resigned after his exclusion from a meeting held with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad the previous day. Other senior regime officials, including President Rouhani, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force commander Gen. Qassem Soleimani had met with the Syrian dictator Assad in Tehran without Zarif being present.

Less than 24 hours later, Rouhani rejected Zarif’s resignation, saying that it would be “against national interests” to accept it.

In an Instagram posting announcing his resignation to the public, Zarif wrote that the Iranian people were displeased with the results of his work on the nuclear framework, giving up thousands of centrifuges and allowing inspections of its nuclear facilities in exchange for lifting of sanctions and a return to normal business around the world.  But the U.S. had broken the agreement and had placed heavier sanctions on Iran and extreme pressure and sanctions on any government or financial entity doing business with Iran. Zarif felt he had let the Iranian people down.

Hardliners in both the Iranian and the U.S. governments make the opportunity for dialogue and negotiations very difficult resulting in the people of Iran continuing to suffer the burden of both Iranian and American ideologies and politicians that have returned international relations to a standstill.

In a move by the hardliners of Iran, on March 12, 2019, Iranian human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh was sentenced to at least seven years’ imprisonment and perhaps up to 33 years and 148 lashes.

Sotoudeh won the Sakharov Prize in 2012 and was convicted following a trial held in absentia. Her husband Reza Khandan was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment in January 2019. The European Union has stated that the right to protest peacefully, as well as the right to express opinion in a non-violent manner, are cornerstones of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Iran is a party.

Ann Wright was in the U.S.Army/Army Reserves for 29 years and retired as a colonel.  She was a U.S. diplomat for 16 years and served in U.S. embassies in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Micronesia, Afghanistan and Mongolia.  She resigned from the U.S. government in March 2003 in opposition to Bush’s war on Iraq.

If you value this original article, please consider making a donation to Consortium News so we can bring you more stories like this one.

Please visit our Facebook page, where you can join the conversation by commenting on our articles to help defeat Facebook censorship. While you are there, please like and follow us, and share this piece! 

28 comments for “US and Iranian Hardliners Continue the Suffering

  1. March 18, 2019 at 17:51

    Dictator, defined by Cambridge Dictionary:

    “a leader who has complete power in a country and has not been elected by the people”

    The word is thrown around a lot, ie Hugo Chavez, who was elected by a landslide twice.

  2. Paul G.
    March 17, 2019 at 12:22

    I am sure these good people will get slandered by the corporate media, if not completely ignored, and slimy government officials. No good deed goes unpunished in our Orwellian country.

  3. March 16, 2019 at 22:52

    Kudos to Col. Ann Wright for this piece. Comments:

    1. I wish Col. Wright and all media contributors — at least those at Consortium News and similar venues — would replace the term “Trump administration” with “Trump regime.” It would help separate him, his criminal gang and frightening behavior from anything that passed for normal prior to January 2017. Swapping these terms would reframe thinking to help delegitimize Trump and his, uh, regime. Correction: Trump has delegitimized himself. Swapping terms would help keep that fact constantly in public awareness.

    2. A friend of mine and fellow activist went to Iran with CODEPINK. A few of his observations and insights can be found here:

    3. Regarding “dictator” when referring to Assad: being elected and enjoying popular support (if true, I haven’t looked into it) do not disqualify him from being a dictator. Assad is no Hitler but, for the record, Hitler was elected and enjoyed significant popular support. These facts did not make him any less a dictator. Whether or to what extent Assad himself deserves the term, I do not know. I’ve not looked into it. (Mea culpa.)

  4. March 16, 2019 at 10:41

    Thank you Ann, and the magnificent Code Pink Peace Delegation to Iran (and Other Countries), While an unconfirmed atheist, I don’t feel it is out of place to intensely wish (pray) that God bless your efforts, because you’re sure not getting much support from where it counts in the halls of power. Maybe they have forgotten we all have human genes.

  5. Christopher and Mary Fogarty
    March 15, 2019 at 20:21

    Am surprised that the heroic Ann Wright felt compelled to adopt the standard regime-change “dictator” label of the murderous psychopaths still running US foreign policy.

  6. March 15, 2019 at 15:06

    I know the group meant well but all they have accomplished is giving Iran’s enemies ammunition about the bad people among Iranian leaders.

    There is no question that Iranians people are upset and turn their anger on the Iranian government. That is, after all, the purpose of the sanctions, to cripple the country then cause the Iranian people to blame themselves. If anything is picked by the major media and our government, it is your findings about the dissatisfaction with the Iranian government.

    Note one of the criticisms of the people mentioned was their dissatisfaction with the government helping Syria and Lebanon defend themselves.

    Finally, we have the liberal use of the word dictator. Assad, elected overwhelmingly by the Syrian people is a dictator. Not mentioned in the article is that Maduro of Venezuela is also a dictator. He got 68% of the vote.The guy who leads the coup is elected according to Pompeo.

    Assad’s measures may be extreme, but at least acknowledge that extremist among his enemies, is far worse and how to fight such extremism require extreme measures.

    I applaud the attempt to convey a people to people effort. You can count on your findings to be handled by the media in a very selective manner.

    • Skip Scott
      March 16, 2019 at 07:37

      Yes, that is the one obvious flaw in a very fine article. Assad got 88.7% of the vote in 2014 with over 70% turnout, including Syrians abroad voting through their embassies. Hardly qualifies him as a dictator. The Syrians are by and large not sectarian, and most of Assad’s military is Sunni. Now that Assad’s forces have won, thousands of displaced Syrians are flooding back across the border to return home. That doesn’t quite fit in with the narrative that they were fleeing a “brutal dictator”.

      • Michael Beer
        March 16, 2019 at 23:29

        Generally anyone who gets 88.7% of the vote is by definition a dictator.

        • Skip Scott
          March 18, 2019 at 07:38

          Really. Please expound on that. Did Assad force an over 70% turnout? Did he have agents abroad forcing citizens to go to their embassies and cast a vote for Assad? I think it far more likely that people like the fact that Assad protects minority rights, and does a good job of running the country. I also think that they realize that any alternative at this point in time would result in Syria turning into another Iraq, and that the rebels are mostly foreign jihadi’s bent on turning Syria into a Wahhabi theocracy. Why would so many citizens be returning to Syria now that Assad’s forces have won if they were fleeing a brutal dictator? The path forward for Syria should be up to the Syrians.

      • Halima
        March 19, 2019 at 00:14

        You are right, As’ad is loved by his people , many would like to be loved like him, he stood and fight for his country , people sometimes are like parrots , just repit what they listen

  7. March 15, 2019 at 13:38

    “the Syrian dictator”? A woman of peace joins in the demonization of poor Syria’s leader (where, as Stephen Gowans notes, the US still desires to do regime change; one of the first steps in which is demonization of the regime’s leader). I have no doubt that Assad is not perfect. Did he sign off on torture (Maher Arar and others)? But there’s something off about Ann’s slight.

  8. Truth first
    March 15, 2019 at 12:59

    Blessed are the peacemakers!!

  9. Theo
    March 15, 2019 at 10:20

    Great article.Thanks.

  10. Jim other
    March 15, 2019 at 08:58

    I commend you for your courage and your efforts and those of your group to convey an alternative view to those of the Iranian who were willing to listen and talk to you. Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement with Iran is regrettable. The US is increasingly isolated from the rest of the countries of the world because of Trump’s bigotry and ignorance.

    • wrighton
      March 15, 2019 at 14:02

      “regrettable”….I think you misspelled DEPLORABLE….no offense….just sayin’

  11. Sally Snyder
    March 15, 2019 at 06:44

    As shown in this article, Benjamin Netanyahu is doing his best to drag the world into a war with Iran:

    Israel and the United States will not stop until Iran is “re-engineered” into a nation that succumbs to Washington’s will.

  12. Rochelle
    March 14, 2019 at 21:17

    Good article. It is always nice to hear from the common folk about the effects unilateral decisions like the many sanctions on Iran and Russia have on them. It also looks to me like Zarif had a less formal, somewhat more relaxed tone in what he said.

    However, I have to agree with Riva Enteen here. Branding Assad as a “dictator” only serves the regime-change drivers and their stenographic “journalists.” I think we have enough stories here by real journalists such as Vanessa Beeley showing that Assad is actually quite popular, and the proxy war foisted on him by the unholy Anglo-Zionist-Wahhabi alliance only rallied most Syrians behind him.

    One more thing that did not really sit well with me is that I don’t think you can really blame the hardliners in Iran on being obstacles to reconciliation or continuing the suffering of the Iranian people.

    Emotional impacts aside, the main difference between 9/11 and the downing of the flight 655 civilian airliner is that — even if we assume that the deep state was not only innocent in the crash but also in their negligence to follow the early leads — the 655 plane was downed by a clear, identifiable, perpetrator supposedly bound by international laws. What’s more, this perpetrator has a clear, traceable history of hostility to Iran and the latter’s right to self-determination. As if that was not bad enough, Iran is only one of the many nations that have received such treatment from this perpetrator, whether through child-killing sanctions that was “worth it” or child-killing bombs in the name of “freedom” or child-killing terrorists as proxy armies.

    The case of Sotoudeh’s imprisonment is relatively new; I have not had the time to familiarize myself with the matter. I will assume it is a legit case of speech suppression for now. But again, in the context of US-Iran relations, it is necessary to remind ourselves that the US and its allies routinely engage in fomenting civil unrest, fake protests-turned-riots masqueraded as popular grievances often intended to incite violent overreactions from the authorities, and funneling money (and sometimes also Kalashnikovs and hell cannons) to opposition groups in countries designated for regime change.

    I am not legitimizing the arrests and persecutions of human rights activists. But I can understand governments around the world, even supposed allies of the US like Turkey, getting paranoid about such activists. At the very least, even if all the arrested and persecuted human rights activists in countries demonized by the US and its allies are legitimate, there lies some blame in such organizations as the NED and Open Society Foundation for creating an unhealthy, suspecting environment for actual activists to operate in.

    So: when faced with such a nation, you can’t blame the hardliners in Iran for not wanting anything to do with the US with its history of not just outright aggression, but also reneging from treaties as well as libels and slanders for nations not aligned with it. If a bunch of kids face a school bully and one of them is about to acquiesce to the bully demanding his lunch, you cannot blame the other kids for telling him to give nothing to the bully, as they speak from experience that the bully reneged on his promises when he said he would not hit them or put excrement on their seats if only they would give the bully their lunch.

    • March 15, 2019 at 13:39

      “One more thing that did not really sit well with me is that I don’t think you can really blame the hardliners in Iran on being obstacles to reconciliation or continuing the suffering of the Iranian people.” The slight of Assad does call into question Ann’s assertions in this regard, Doesn’t it?

    • Skip Scott
      March 16, 2019 at 07:28

      Great comment Rochelle. It is quite a shame that we have chosen the wrong ally in that part of the world. Since the ousting of Mosaddegh in the ’50’s, Iran has known that the US can’t be trusted. Until we make capitalism subservient to democracy, the US will never be trustworthy. We must insist that our government learns to wage peace in a multi-polar world.

  13. March 14, 2019 at 19:07

    Very informative article. Thank you to all of you in the delegation for your apology on all of our behalf for America’s cold blooded murder of everyone aboard flight Iran Air 655.

  14. March 14, 2019 at 18:04

    Great article, but I wish she didn’t use the word “dictator” every time she mentions Assad’s name. I thought he was very popular with most Syrians.

    • Tom Kath
      March 14, 2019 at 19:38

      Yes, I feel people expose obvious ignorance and pathetic bias when they refer to president Assad as “dictator”or president Trump as “idiot”. It is like someone referring to the author as the “delusional” Ann Wright. – These “opinions” only describe the person offering that opinion.

    • Elmer
      March 15, 2019 at 12:45

      Yesterday I feel the same when I read that word, instantly feeling it was another pc of propaganda:

  15. Clarioncaller
    March 14, 2019 at 17:15

    Its amazing that the CIA continues to control the leadership of Iran. The people of Iran are very intelligent and know that they are being ‘okey-doked’ by the globalists. Time for REAL change.

  16. Jeff Harrison
    March 14, 2019 at 16:44

    If you can see the US government as anything but evil after reading this, there is no hope for you as a human being.

  17. March 14, 2019 at 15:50

    I dislike the headline, as if US and Iranian “hardliners” are equally to blame for the current situation. Iran will necessarily join Syria, Turkey, Russia, China, and other countries determined not to succumb to the US-Israeli-Saudi axis.

  18. Bob Guertling
    March 14, 2019 at 14:37

    Great article. I commend all those who work so hard for peace with Iran. The United States Congress and current and past Presidents work on behalf of the Zionists who want the Iranian nation destroyed.

Comments are closed.