The avalanche of funeral hagiography drowned any possible discussion of what Bush did to the Middle East. As’ad AbuKhalil writes that he rallied despots against Iraq and established a new, tyrannical security order in the region.
Sequel to ‘British Betrayal’ of WWI
By As`ad AbuKhalil
Special to Consortium News
Any sober assessment of late President George H.W. Bush’s political legacy was drowned last week by the avalanche of hagiography by the mainstream media. This served, in part, the role of catharsis. The more loudly the members of the media praised Bush, whose family has testy relations with President Donald Trump, the more it helped them vent their animosity towards the current president.
Lost in this anti-historical, fact-free binge was any possible discussion of Bush’s most important legacies, one of which is certainly his great fake-out of Arab interests in the Middle East. Almost every U.S. president since Harry S. Truman has been more pro-Israel than his predecessor. The sole exception to this was George H.W. Bush. But via the war against Iraq, his administration wound up embracing Israeli interests and regional hegemony to such a degree that it left lasting damage to peace and stability in the region.
H.W. Bush was adept at changing ideologies to suit the venue. The man who emerged from the “moderate” wing of the East Coast Republican Party became the political heir of President Ronald Reagan, who wooed the Religious Right and made abortion a litmus test for all Supreme Court nominees.
While Bush did not leave a presidential memoir, (he is the first since Franklin D. Roosevelt not to do so), he did coauthor a book with Brent Scowcroft, his national security advisor, “A World Transformed.” This offers evidence of Bush’s close ties with Arab Gulf despots and the deposed Egyptian strongman Husni Mubarak, who served as his chief advisor on the region.
Bush was obviously impressed by the fabulous wealth and hospitality of Arab potentates. At one point in the book, during a stay in one of King Fahd’s marble guest palaces, he marvels at the chandeliers, the air conditioning and goes on at length about a lavish state dinner. “I had never seen so much—and of nearly every conceivable type of food.”
Wealthy Arab Friends
Bush’s ties with wealthy Arabs served him well. Lebanese businessman Najad Isam Faris and Syrian businessman Jamale Daniel helped the business career of Bush’s son, Neil. With his network of Gulf associates, Bush served as a prized advisor to the Carlyle Group, the global, private equity firm based in Washington, D.C., with a specialty of investing in companies that depend on government contracts.
Bush’s footprints in the region begin with his oil-business years in Texas. At that point, in the 1950s, oil companies often served as a chief lobbying force for Gulf regimes against the Israeli lobby. This was not due to any humanitarian concern for the plight of the Palestinian people. It was due to the usual financial motivation. The Israel lobby opposed closer ties between the U.S. and all Arab countries, which compelled oil businesses to defend their Gulf suppliers. Since the Israeli lobby opposed U.S. arms sales to Middle East regimes, it had other big-business opponents as well.
Later in his life, Bush also dealt with the Middle East as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and as director of the CIA. (The deputy chief of Saudi intelligence during Bush’s time at the CIA, Prince Turki Al-Faisal, was one of the few foreign dignitaries invited to attend the funeral).
When the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, paid tribute last week to Bush he concealed a long history of Israeli detestation for the man.
Please give to our end-of-year fund drive, by clicking Donate.
As Ronald Reagan’s vice president, Bush—along with James Baker, the White House chief of staff, and Caspar Weinberger, the secretary of defense—had the coolest attitudes towards Israel of any in the administration, which was otherwise loaded with ardent Zionists. Bush was vilified for his 1991 remark that he was a “one lonely guy” battling “a thousand lobbyists on the Hill.”
Nonetheless Bush toed the pro-Israeli line and championed the cause of Soviet Jewish dissidents and the sponsorship of the emigration of Jews from Ethiopia, Syria and the former Soviet Union to Israel. He also recruited ardent Zionists (Jack Kemp, Condoleezza Rice and Dennis Ross) for his administration.
As president, Bush was branded an anti-Semite in 1991 for “deferring” for 120 days $10 billion in loan guarantees to Israel. He did this to prevent Israel from putting the money toward settlements in the occupied lands of 1967. Bush was also trying to persuade Israel to join the U.S.-sponsored peace process.
Serious About Settlements
This was the only time the U.S. government treated the settlements and the Israeli role in the peace process as a serious matter. The Obama administration did voice mild protestations about the settlements, which violate international law. But after Bush, the settlements never again caused any serious irritation to U.S.-Israeli relations.
The Bush administration also, at one point, banned Ariel Sharon, the Israeli militarist and politician, from entering U.S. government buildings due to his statements against the U.S. role in the peace process. (When Jack Kemp, housing secretary at the time, wanted to meet with Sharon, James Baker instructed him to meet outside government offices).
But in Iraq, the Bush administration began the process of removing a regime that the Israel government had been complaining about for years. This was before Israel discovered the Iranian danger. It was also many years after Israel rid itself of the Egyptian danger thanks to the Camp David Accords between the despotic Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and the Israeli government under the auspices of the American human rights president, Jimmy Carter. Going forward, the U.S. bombed everything on Israel’s bombing wish list in Iraq.
Bush was intent on going to war against Iraq in 1990. He sent Dick Cheney, then secretary of defense, and Colin Powell, then chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, to Riyadh to persuade the king that U.S. troops were needed on the ground in Saudi Arabia to protect the kingdom from an Iraqi invasion (U.S. ships had moved before Cheney stepped foot on Saudi soil).
Rallying Against Iraq
The H.W.Bush administration rallied Arab despots against Iraq and established a regional tyrannical order. Even the Syrian regime rose above its previous conflicts with the U.S. and got on board. Together, they denied Saddam Hussein, Iraq’s president, the one condition that he sought for withdrawal. As Bush admits in the book he coauthored, that sole condition was access to the Persian Gulf.
From 1991 on, most members of the U.S. armed forces—especially the Air Force—began to train over (or on) Arab lands. Today that means bases and military activities in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Oman, UAE, Syria (illegally), not to mention other places where the U.S. maintains secret military and intelligence bases (it was leaked to the press a few years ago that Dubai hosts one of the largest CIA bases in the world).
Bush exploited the Gulf War to impose a security regime where the U.S.—and not the local despotic clients—called the shots. Furthermore, Bush introduced the misuse of the U.N. as “an added cloak of political cover for U.S. wars and actions,” as is described on page 416 of the book he coauthored.
In targeting Iraq, Bush begin to eliminate the biggest (albeit exaggerated) Arab military power. He also pushed Arab governments to sit face-to-face with Israel in Madrid without securing any concessions from Israel at all.
The “peace process” under Bush was just as it had been under his predecessors and successors. It amounted to empty promises of U.S. rewards for Arab participation in the war on Iraq. It was a repeat of the “British betrayal” of World War I, when, in exchange for help fighting against the Ottoman Empire, Arabs thought they would earn independence.
As’ad AbuKhalil is a Lebanese-American professor of political science at California State University, Stanislaus. He is the author of the “Historical Dictionary of Lebanon” (1998), “Bin Laden, Islam and America’s New War on Terrorism (2002), and “The Battle for Saudi Arabia” (2004). He tweets as @asadabukhalil
If you value this original article, please consider making a donation to Consortium News so we can bring you more stories like this one. Please give to our end-of-year fund drive, by clicking Donate.
Please visit our Facebook page where you can join the conversation by commenting on our articles to help defeat Facebook censorship. While you are there please like and follow us, and share this piece!
David Rockefeller, John McCain, George H.W. Bush, its’s been a great couple of years, alot to look forward to in 2019, Cheney perhaps?
Yep on this but given all the President’s actions since Carter you have to rate HW Bush as the guy who at least was trying to “Stay the course of the Ship of State”. The others were rudderless. Easy to ignore that Bush ran Reagan’s Foreign Policy while Raygun positioned himself as a single minded rabid Anti-Commie/Soviet. This is how the USA conducts itself. Why didn’t this author launch into or even mention GHWB becoming head of the Carlyle Group after he left office. Allso, there is real time video of Bush the Elder visiting and giving Monsanto his blessing shortly before ENABLING them to do their worst as an element of our Free Trade Negotiations. At least GHWB’s Administration prosecuted for the S & L Shenanigans ( Wherefore arte thou Obama”). Rule of Law and carry a loaded gun. This is US . Why pretend about right or wrong ( Yemen, Syria, KASHOGEE,etc.) 30 years de facto?
Indeed. Not sure why Americans feel the need to whitewash criminals such as Reagan and Bush, but we do. I ain’t buying it.
Me either. Operation Condor, Iran Contra, Desert Storm and leaving the Kurds to the tender mercy of Saddam, not to mention being VP while St Ronnie armed his ‘ friend’, and ‘ally’. and so much more.
The answer to a couple of the author’s questions: Bush was CIA. Lifelong CIA.
Readers may enjoy:
Incredible info and video
I believe that Bush was never much of an oilman. Zapata Petroleum was mainly a CIA front. By the way, when he was going through confirmation hearings, Bush testified under oath that he had never had any dealings with the CIA. That apparently was a lie.
The 1991 Gulf War constituted a deliberate conspiracy to deceive the public and achieve 1) permament bases for US military in Middle East. 2) divert an expected “peace dividend” at the end of the Cold War back to military spending.
A GHW Bush LEGASY YOU CAN BE PROUD OF !!
A Legacy You Can Be Proud Of. … from GHW Bush !
Please don’t forget the APRIL GLASPIE tip that was a GW Bush’s “Go Ahead” nod to Saddam to enter Kuwait. …
Also consider the weapons provided to Shia Iraqi militants by GHWB, along with U S helicopter gunship support (turning Iraqi against Iraqi) as the army of Saddam retreated in surrender from Kuwait.
A once peaceful and educationally progressive Iraq, where Sunni and Shia INTERMARRIED! was foundationally and fundamentally dismembered by lies, deception and weaponry supplied by the American gov’t, for the purpose of the DIS- EMBODIMENT of a Nation of Peoples and their well established Government as a Precursor to the TOTAL DESTRUCTION of that nation, that was to follow… .
“god bless america”
RELIVE THE HIGHWAY OF DEATH
April Galspie / GHW Bush’s OK. …
The important information gleaned from the transcript is that Glaspie makes specific point that the information she conveys comes direct from Bush and Secretary of State Baker. Some have inferred that she went “rogue” on this, but she didn’t. She simply conveyed the message from the highest levels.
Thanks for this look into the details of this history. I remember being amazed at Bush and Baker actually withholding money from Israel. Alas, the Israeli tentacles controlled too many levers of power in America for even its President to resist. And even with Trump being such a blatant puppet of Israel, the mainstream press covers up this story.
For new readers of CN, a compact, fairly detailed account of Israel’s takeover of America is in
Go deeper, and find the book,
The Secret History Against The Jews
by John Loftus and Mark Aarons
Thanks for that reference. It appears to be more bogus Israeli disinformation. Here’s a review of the book, and particularly its story about Israel’s sinking of the USS Liberty, by a person who was on the USS Liberty at the time.
Well, If you have memories (Not Streisand’s) like ours you can probably remember how GHWB’s prospects for re-election went into a downward spiral shortly after his Administration denied $10 Billion in guaranteed loans for building Housing on the West Bank…. but Read My Lips: If Ross Perot hadn’t entered the election and taken %17 of the vote in the 1992 Presidential election Bush would have won re-election easily. FACT. The narrative was that Perot went out with Bush in a Powerboat while visiting Kennebunkport that lost power and waves came up then an exasperated Bush became a bit unhinged ( perhaps having had a rough experience downing his airplane in a ditch in his last mission in WW II that cost some of his his fellow servicemen their lives left some Ghosts in the Machine). Anyway the story was Perot, also a left handed former Navy Officer, lost respect all respect at that moment for GHWB and decided he wasn’t fit for Command. (Remember him saying fellow Arkansas native Bill CLinton was strictly ” Middle Management”) History is tough, unintended circumstances and all that, the devil is in the details.
Thanks for those details, quite fascinating. Here’s a recent article on Bush’s election problem with the Israelis.
“Bush’s opposition to Israel in ’91 hurt his bid for second term, and skewed U.S. foreign policy right”