Democrats Versus Their Voters

Wilmer J. Leon, III says Democratic leaders’ concern about democratic socialists’ electability has shifted to what to do now they are winning. It’s no longer the messenger; it’s the message.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries addressing a vice presidential debate watch party in Phoenix, Oct. 1, 2024. (Gage Skidmore /Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 2.0)

By Wilmer J. Leon, III
Trice/Edney Newswire

“In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no ‘two evils’ exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a ‘Socialist’ Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform.  If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by ‘force and violence.’ Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called ‘Communist’ …”  — Dr. W.E.B. DuBois 

How prophetic was the brilliant American sociologist, writer, historian, Pan-Africanist, and civil rights activist, W.E.B. DuBois?  As we witness the backlash from the Democratic Party’s leadership, as well as President Donald Trump’s response to the success of democratic socialist candidates in the New York City, Washington, D.C., and  Colorado primaries, a couple of important questions come to the forefront.  

Are we witnessing the development of a new politics in America?  If so, what should the response of the African-American community and electorate be?

It is important to understand that changes in the political landscape take time.  Events such as democratic socialists winning over Democratic Party-backed candidates do not happen in a vacuum. One must understand the history in order to understand “the now.” 

In the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primary Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) decisively defeated Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire. During the 2016 campaign Sanders “came out” as a “democratic socialist (DS)” during a speech at Georgetown University. 

He told the crowd that democratic socialism is not a Marxist ideology calling for the abolition of capitalism:

“I don’t believe government should own the means of production, but I do believe that the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a fair deal…”

Democratic Party leaders were initially alarmed and strategists suggested the party distance itself from Sanders.  Party leaders feared that the label “democratic socialist” would be politically radioactive.  Hillary Clinton said his ideas were economically unfeasible and politically unrealistic. Republicans seized on the “socialist” label to frame his campaign as a radical shift toward government control.

Sanders and Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire in July 2016. (Marc Nozell /Wikimedia Commons /CC BY 2.0)

In the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary Sanders gained more traction as his message of free tuition at public universities, campaign finance reform and single-payer healthcare resonated with more voters across the electorate.

He lost a very controversial and disputed race to Pete Buttigieg in the Iowa caucuses with Sanders winning the popular vote but losing the primary.  Sanders won a narrow victory in the New Hampshire primary and won in the Nevada caucuses

From 2016 forward, Democratic Party stalwarts and elites have watched Sanders and his message take hold. They see the growing crowds, growing energy and enthusiasm, favorable polling data and growing fundraising from small and large donors. 

The concern for them has shifted from “will he lose to Republicans?” to “what do we do if he wins?”  It’s no longer the messenger; it’s now the message. 

And other than stating the obvious — that Trump is, as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told us back in 2015 “a ‘race-baiting, xenophobic’ bigot” — what’s the Democratic Party’s message? How are they going to make the lives of Americans better?

Building upon the momentum created by Sanders we now have “The Squad” — four congresswomen of color, sworn-in in 2020. While some refer to themselves as democratic socialists, they all express support for DS policies.

Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, the first Somali-American member of Congress and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan are the first two Muslim women ever elected to Congress.

Tlaib challenged the Democratic Party agenda when she publicly supported the pro-Palestine BDS movement.

Motivating the Progressive Ranks

 Tlaib protesting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to U.S. Congress, July 24, 2024. (C-Span screenshot)

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.

Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts is very clear in her support of immigrant rights and has said, “The people closest to the pain should be closest to the power.”

They have motivated the “progressive” ranks within the Democratic Party to varying degrees. These women have articulated support for ideas such as Medicare for All, a $15-dollar minimum wage, debt-free college and have called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). 

[WATCH: CN Live!‘Socialism in America?]

In last year’s Democratic Party New York City mayoral primary, then New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo 56 percent to 44 percent.

The Democratic Party establishment was not pleased with the outcome. Cuomo said,

“Extremism, division and empty promises are not the answer to this city’s problems, and while this was a look at what motivates a slice of our primary electorate, it does not represent the majority.”

After the primary, former New York Gov. David Patterson called upon Democrats (members of Mamdani’s own party) to work together to defeat him. Democratic leadership held meetings to discuss their options in the general election. 

Mamdani went on to the general election, where he defeated Cuomo who ran as an Independent and Republican Curtis Sliwa. To that Trump said (as Dr. DuBois projected), “Look, we don’t need a communist in this country…”

Based upon this brief history of fits and starts we now come to the current day. Three congressional candidates in New York City won their primary races with the support of Mamdani and his allies.

In Washington, D.C., Councilmember Janeese Lewis Geroge, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist won the Democratic Party primary for mayor as well. 

In Colorado, democratic socialist Melat Kiros, 29, ousted 30-year incumbent from Denver. Rep. Diana DeGette, a liberal, 51 percent to 42 percent. 

Kiros in May. (Andra Turner/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Washington Post reports, “After three candidates endorsed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani won their congressional primaries in New York last week, establishment Democrats felt angst. Democratic socialists looked to Colorado, and the money followed.”

In New York, Brad Lander, a Mamdani-allied candidate, defeated incumbent Congressman Daniel Goldman, 66 percent to 34 percent.  Goldman received over $320,000 in contributions connected to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) for the 2026 election cycle. 

Claire Valdez defeated Antonio Reynoso for an open seat, 58 percent to 33 percent.

Darializa Avila Chevalier, another democratic socialist unseated five-term incumbent Congressman Adriano Espaillat, 49 percent to 46 percent. Espaillat’s campaign directly received $5,000 from AIPAC itself, with an additional $140,000 to $376,000 in individual contributions earmarked or bundled by the organization. Additionally, United Democracy Project — an AIPAC’s super PAC — poured $650,000 into another PAC (BOLD America) that spent $2.8 million supporting Espaillat.

Are the democratic socialist politics of Mayor Mamdani and the candidates he supports proving to be the next iteration of a progressive movement within the American body politic?  If so, why is the Democratic Party establishment, including many of its African American leaders, so afraid of this shift in politics?

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) says Mamdani is going to have to smooth things over with congressional Democrats

Why? The candidates he and his allies backed won the primaries fair and square. Unless as Dubois stated, “I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names…”

A New Politics 

W.E.B. Du Bois, circa 1911. (Addison N. Scurlock, Wikimedia Commons/ Public Domain)

New York Attorney General Letitia James (who formerly supported Mamdani) said,

“Some of the candidates that he (Mamdani) has supported are individuals who do not understand the politics of New York City, the cultural differences from district to district, who have not been part of the history and the struggle of some of these districts, and are relatively new to the body politic…”

Oh, so the voters are stupid and were fooled? Does she honestly believe that establishment politicians who fill their coffers with AIPAC money know what’s best for voters more that the actual voters themselves? Really? These are the racist tropes usually used by white politicians to explain votes cast by “colored” voters.

The voters are not stupid, but many are confused.  I wrote a piece entitled, He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune, wherein I wrote, “Many voters are confused. They can’t understand why in so many instances the individuals they elect to represent their interests, get to Congress and represent the interests of outside forces.” 

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) have received millions of dollars in campaign funding from AIPAC.

According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records, AIPAC-backed members of the caucus have received at least $3.6 million — and an estimated total of nearly $9 million across several election cycles. 

Specific leading recipients include:

  • Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY): At least $950,331.
  • Shontel Brown (D-OH): At least $1,028,686.
  • Glenn Ivey (D-MD): At least $775,199. 

When AIPAC boasted that it was committing $100m to defeat Democratic Party incumbents in order to fight back a wave of progressive dissent over Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, did Rep. Jeffries complain? No!

[In November, Mamdani told the NBC TV news show Meet the Press that he would endorse Jeffries, currently the House minority leader, as speaker if the Democrats gain control in the current mid-terms; the New York City Democratic Socialists of America chapter followed Mamdani’s advice against backing Jeffries’ primary challenger in his Brooklyn district.]

When AIPAC money helped a pair of Black pro-Israel Democrats defeat progressive Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO), did AG  James or Rep. Jeffries demand an apology or claim that representatives of AIPAC were, “going to have to smooth things over with congressional Democrats” as he has demanded of Mamdani?  No!  They went along to go along.

What is it about affordable housing, a living wage, and the growth of unions, that is causing establishment Democrats such consternation? What’s wrong with the idea of working people running both the economy and civil society? 

Why won’t the Democratic Party clearly condemn Israel for the genocide in historic Palestine?  Aren’t these the policies and politics of Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer, Ms. Ida B. Wells, Dr. King, Dr. DuBois, Paul Robeson, Malcolm X, Ms. Ella Baker and so many others? 

Are these not the policies and politics of the original members of the Congressional Black Caucus, the original corps of lawmakers dedicated to safeguarding civil rights and known as “the conscience of the Congress?” Is the conscience of the Congress now unconscious?

How prophetic was DuBois?

“If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by ‘force and violence.’ Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called ‘Communist.’”

No matter what you call it, no matter what you call them, those who are championing civil rights, workers’ rights, equal pay for equal work, an end to these senseless, illegal and immoral wars of choice should be listened to. 

There is a new politics developing and members of the African-American electorate should be paying attention because the constituents are not being paid by AIPAC to vote against their own interests and the interests of their community. Too many so-called people in positions of leadership are. Remember, it’s not the messenger, it’s the message.

Dr. Wilmer Leon is a nationally broadcast radio talk-show host. Author of Politics Another Perspective. Host of Inside the Issues w/ Dr. Wilmer Leon on SiriusXM Satellite radio channel 126. Go to his website  or email: wjl3us@yahoo.com. Follow him on X @DrWilmerLeon and Dr. Leon’s Prescription at Facebook.com.

This article is from the Trice/Edney Newswire

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Please Donate to
CN’s
Summer
Fund Drive!

13 comments for “Democrats Versus Their Voters

  1. Dienne
    July 5, 2026 at 19:03

    “He told the crowd that democratic socialism is not a Marxist ideology calling for the abolition of capitalism”

    He’s correct and therein lies the problem. Capitalism needs to be abolished and workers (not the government) need to own the means of production, which, by extension, means that the people have control over things that affect them in their lives – jobs, housing, healthcare, education, etc. DSA is just a bunch of sheepdogs that will argue for a few tweaks to save capitalism, but ultimately fight to keep the system that is killing us all.

    • LeoSun
      July 6, 2026 at 13:17

      “He coulda been f/BRILLANT! IF, only, IMO, he wholephknheartedly, wanted to be POTUS. “He” woulda accepted Dr. Stein’s invitation & done the right thing, “Take A Smart Risk” i.e.,

      Message To: Bernie Sanders, wanna be POTUS: “Hello, Bernie. The Green Party is rock’n! Please, “Come On Over & Catapult The Greens fm coast to coast, into Mainstream/Middle America! Let it be known, The Green Party is down w/“Bernie” for POTUS!” Imagine, Bernie & The Green Party, instantly, becomes the flagpole to “our” Nation under siege by the Duopoly.”

      Basically, Dr. Stein’s Green Party’s Message: “Just Do It! Bernie. “Go, Green!” You say you wanna Revolution?” Free yourself, Bernie! Cut ties w/The Mother$hip, the DNC, that’s got a f/grip on “you know the thing.” Bernie’s response, C r i c k e t s …….basically, “when pigs fly”.

      Bear in mind, Bernie Sanders, Senator/Candidate/Citizen, is not only, IMO, 100% full of hot-air; BUT, he’s 100% void of basic, common courtesy. He never f/ever R.S.V.P.’d via phone, courier or electronically to Dr. Stein &/or The Green Party. Not even a TY!. Zero. Zip. Nada! IMO, Never f/ever, again, will “we” be buffaloed, bamboozled, betrayed by Bernie. Basically, Fugg Him! “Pray for Birdies.” TY.

  2. LeoSun
    July 4, 2026 at 14:14

    Dr. Leon, “Are the democratic socialist politics of Mayor Mamdani and the candidates he supports proving to be the next iteration of a progressive movement within the American body politic?” …. Absophknlutely! 2026’s *“grassroots progressive movement [DEFEATS] the [Old Guard!]”! “Two steps forward to advance; one step backward to check.”

    Everybody, knows, The Mother$hip (the DNC) is in dry dock rock’n w/blowback, “millions of dollars $pent by corporate interests & AIPAC.” Cry, harder! The mountain wins, again! “M” for Mamdani’s “hat trick,” Claire Valdez, Darializa Avila Chevalier, Brad Lander! Congratulations!

    “The Beauty of a Hat Trick is its showcase of skill, perseverance, and sometimes, a bit of luck.”

    Hence, MEMO TO: the Democratic Party establishment (+) its African American [“leaders”] “so afraid of this shift in politics” RE: “The $tatus Quo” has got to go!!!

    Please, “Say Their Names!” IMO, the Dem Party has ZERO black/white/brown leaders, diplomats, statesmen/women, free thinkers. They’re bought & $old. IMO, They’re NOT even human! “Some humans ain’t”. They’re politicians. They’re f/frauds living, loving, laughing, on The Hill. “Working tirelessly” for the ICEY Kingdom’s Trump-Vance, Inc.-Israel; “AND, if [they] listen, NOW. [They] might hear a new sound coming in as an old one disappears,” i.e., The $tatus Quo Has GOT To GO!

    “See the world in just one grain of sand. [“They”] better take a closer look [NOT] let it slip right through [their] hand. Won’t [they], please, hear the call!”

    “Now is the moment, please understand,” Critical Thinking lives matter!

    p.s., CN’s serving up another “hat trick” tonite @ Eight (8). “CHEERS! TWTW”. TY.

    * “Put the Message in the Box” World Party. (Onward & Upwards)!
    *hxxps://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/24/gaza-deals-blow-to-democrats-in-nyc-primaries/

  3. LeoSun
    July 4, 2026 at 12:39

    “Democrats Versus Their Voters” by Dr. Leon. “Oh, so the voters are stupid and were fooled?”

    …..“Oh, Dr. Leon III, the receipts, abound! On full f/display! The Democrats’ solidarity blows @ their National Convention, chanting, “We” Love You, Joe!”

    “Does she [Letitia James] honestly believe that establishment politicians who fill their coffers with AIPAC money know what’s best for voters more that the actual voters themselves? Really? These are the racist tropes usually used by white politicians to explain votes cast by “colored” voters.”

    AND, “He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune,” i.e., 1) “Sandy” aka AOC, *“considered to be on the extreme Left of mainstream US politics” put it, ‘working tirelessly for a ceasefire’. A party to the genocide cannot be a mediator.” 2) “Ridin with Biden” the Black Caucus, The White Congress, The Brown Congress i.e., “The $quad,” squawk, squawk about him, all night talk about him, “We Love You, Joe!” 3) “I’m with HER!” Bernie “the Independent, Hot-Air Factory fm Vermont via NYC” $anders; AND, 4) The elephant in the room, all those New Yorkers for Mamdani PLUS 3 were a Big Fat f/“NO SHOW” for Bowman & Bush. Deservedly!!!

    “Can I get a “B“ for BETRAYAL?

    Hence, “Many voters are confused. They can’t understand why in so many instances the individuals they elect to represent their interests, get to Congress and represent the interests of outside forces.” Dr. Wilmer Leon III.

    [SO LET US, ONCE & FOR ALL DISPENSE with the LIE] about the US being a mediator, a restraining influence.” Arundhati Roy @ hxxps://pentransmissions.com/2024/10/15/no-propaganda-on-earth-can-hide-the-wound-that-is-palestine-arundhati-roys-pen-pinter-prize-2024-speech/

  4. WillD
    July 4, 2026 at 02:28

    Israel doesn’t like it? Tough! They know where they can shove it.

  5. LeoSun
    July 4, 2026 at 01:08

    *“What can possibly justify what Israel is doing? Like every state that has carried out ethnic cleansing and genocide in history, Zionists in Israel – who believe themselves to be ‘the chosen people’ – began by dehumanising Palestinians before driving them off their land and murdering them.” Furthermore,“Why won’t the Democratic Party clearly condemn Israel for the genocide in historic Palestine?” Because, “a party to the genocide cannot” [condemn what it condones]. Succinctly answered by Arundhati Roy, monts/years ago.

    ….10.5.24, “A party to the genocide cannot be a mediator.” Arundhati Roy. “Not all the power and money, not all the weapons and propaganda on earth can any longer hide the wound that is Palestine. The wound through which the whole world, including Israel, bleeds.”

    “I ask you, which of us sitting in this hall would willingly submit to the indignity that Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank have been subjected to for decades? What peaceful means have the Palestinian people not tried? What compromise have they not accepted – other than the one that requires them to crawl on their knees and eat dirt?”

    “Israel is not fighting a war of self-defence. is fighting a war of aggression. A war to occupy more territory, to strengthen its Apartheid apparatus and tighten its control on Palestinian people and the region.” ARUNDHATI ROY’s PEN Pinter Prize 2024 Speech @ hxxps://pentransmissions.com/2024/10/15/no-propaganda-on-earth-can-hide-the-wound-that-is-palestine-arundhati-roys-pen-pinter-prize-2024-speech/

    …The owl asks, “WHO can forget “Joe being Joe,” ‘I don’t believe you have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and I am a Zionist.” President Joe Biden, who calls himself a non-Jewish Zionist and unflinchingly bankrolls and arms Israel while it commits its war crimes.” No f/doubt about it,

    “Joe Biden”-[Comma La Harris] “owns this. The US president owns every despicable aspect of the calamity unfolding in Gaza perpetrated by his country’s ever reliable and obedient proxy, Israel.” Andrew Mitrovica @ hxxps://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/10/19/joe-biden-owns-this

    “I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names…” Dr. DuBois,

  6. Nyah
    July 3, 2026 at 19:23

    I heard that Killer-Cop Kamala recently requested a meeting with Mamdani, to find out how she could ‘get on his wave’. I hope he told her “You can’t. People won’t vote for someone who is fine with being complicit in genocide”.

  7. NevilShute
    July 3, 2026 at 15:33

    The Democrats seem to offer more of the same pablum, one election cycle after another. It should finally dawn on them that something is terribly wrong, so wrong that the likes of Trump’s empty promises resonate with enough voters to land him in the White House. Here’s a thought: Run campaigns that focus on something everyone needs: Universal healthcare. Something like 2/3 of the public supports healthcare for everyone, but our “leaders,” respond more to their donors than the needs of the public. Sending these corporate shills packing would be a good start.

  8. Lois Gagnon
    July 3, 2026 at 15:00

    DSA are still all Democrats and when push comes to shove will vote Blue No Matter Who. They are trying to push party leadership into a more left position, but I will believe it when I see it. We need a redo in this country. The banker owned military intelligence controlled system is leading the whole world over the climate cliff. We are in an emergency situation and must act accordingly. We need a real socialist takeover that will replace capitalism. Ask any member of DSA if they want to replace capitalism.

  9. Em
    July 3, 2026 at 13:40

    Thanks to CN’s interview of Kshama Savant (how appropriate a family name!): a highly politically learned, scholarly person, someone who possesses a profound and specialized knowledge in the field of political organization, for the working class, against the ownership class.
    In 2016 Sanders told the crowd that democratic socialism is not a Marxist ideology calling for the abolition of capitalism: “I don’t believe government should own the means of production, but I do believe that the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a fair deal…” And corporate capitalism is going to deliver that fair deal via the dictatorship of the Democratic party regime Bernie?
    The political term “democratic socialist” needs to be radioactive, for the people are more afraid of what they know nothing about than they are of the actual radioactivity contained in the impending threat of global nuclear war annihilation.
    “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”— “nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance, and ‘boy oh boy’ has the democratic establishment done a job, since 1933, in pulling the wool over the eyes of the overall American public.
    And then 93 years later a leader from the people’s class appears to light the way from retreat into authentic advance, bearing the auspicious nonEuropean nametag of Kshama Savant more closely related to the “Mahatma”, translating to “great soul” or “noble spirit” – born Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, in India, in 1869. His international repute back then, as a bone fide global leader; the direct opposite of what we, all of the people, are being exposed to nowadays.
    “Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) have received millions of dollars in campaign funding from AIPAC (to vote against their own interests)… According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records, AIPAC-backed members of the ‘caucus’ have received at least $3.6 million — and an estimated total of nearly $9 million across several election cycles; surely a mere pittance compared with what AIPAC has given, over time, to the majority of assorted Congressional bigots, self-serving hypocrites, outright racists, and other unwitting members..
    Apparently, Dr. Wilmer Leon expects “a pair of (unnamed) Black pro-Israel Democrats who defeat progressive Reps. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Cori Bush (D-MO)” … to act monolithically, in being able to resist the bribes of AIPAC. Do White pro-Israel Democrats act any differently, when it comes to refusing bribes and voting against their own better interests?
    White European-American racism has been a foundational tool, the most effective tool of the long-established divide and rule governmental policy, Today, as opposed to the pre-Civil War era, White folks now consistently vote against their own class, better interests, all the time; not recognizing that the issue is no longer race specific, but class specific. We, the people, are all of the one and same working class standing against the elite owning classes!

  10. Selina
    July 3, 2026 at 12:51

    Besides almost a million AIPAC dollars in his pocket, I absolutely do not understand what sustains Hakeem Jeffries in power? He’s a wet blanket. So what is going on? As for Schumer, the same question for this Israel Firster? What keeps him leading the ship? Can anyone help inform?

  11. Sean Deiseach
    July 3, 2026 at 10:29

    Michael Hudson said it best:
    “In today’s U.S. political duopoly the role of the Democratic Party is to protect the Republicans from attacks from the left.”

    • Patrick Powers
      July 3, 2026 at 21:45

      I would say their role is to divert all liberal energies into unpopular causes such as wokeness. I call it Unpopulism. Or futile doomed efforts such as packing the SCROTUS or converting the Presidential election to a popular vote. The repeated failures of such efforts inculcates a highly desirable ethos of despair and helplessness. Espousal of highly popular causes such as raising the minimum wage, nationalized health care, or chastisement of Israel is vigorously suppressed as antithetical to Unpopulism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.