Vijay Prashad: UN Approves Slavery Reparations

The U.N. General Assembly voted today for the Global North to apologize and pay reparations for slavery by a vote of 123-3-52, with only the U.S., Israel and Argentina voting against. The E.U. abstained.

Kwaku Yaro (Ghana), Stand by Me, 2022. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

By Vijay Prashad
Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research

We live in an upside-down world. The leaders of the richer nations, the old colonial powers, want to rehabilitate the language of imperialism: praise for their past, and a desire to repeat that messianism in the present.

Meanwhile, the peoples of the poorer nations agitate for peace and development, as well as for an apology for the crimes of colonialism and reparations for the plunder carried out during that period. The slogan from the people is simple: ‘Justice must come’. It rumbles now but will grow louder with time.

When officials from the United States come to Europe to talk about geopolitics, senior European officials listen intently. Last year, at the Munich Security Conference, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance scolded the Europeans for what he called a crisis “of our own making.”

He was rebuked for being insolent toward European democracy, which he chastised for being insufficiently attentive to the ‘issue’ of migration and for being overly concerned about the rise of the far right of a special type.

European newspapers, from The Guardian to Le Monde, criticised Vance for his insolence.

However, most of the senior liberal European officials – from the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte – bowed their heads and said that Europe would do well to meet the goals set by the United States for military spending.

This drive for militarisation has gone hand in hand with a steady capitulation to the far right.

Christopher Cozier, Trinidad and Tobago, Tropical Night, 2006–2014. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

This year, the U.S. representative to the Munich Security Conference was Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In his speech, Rubio offered a fairly accurate history lesson:

“For five centuries, before the end of the Second World War, the West had been expanding – its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe.

But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting. Europe was in ruins. Half of it lived behind an Iron Curtain, and the rest looked like it would soon follow. The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.”

Rubio’s general historical orientation is correct. European colonialism was in ascendency roughly from 1492 – the opening of the Americas to conquest and enslavement – until the mid-twentieth century.

Then, after the defeat of fascism in the World Anti-Fascist War, led by the Soviet Union and fought at immense cost in China, European colonialism was pushed aside by the rapid rise of both communist and national liberation movements, with the communists in Vietnam (1945), China (1949), and Cuba (1959) prevailing against all odds to inaugurate communist experiments in poorer nations.

María Magdalena Campos-Pons, Cuba, De las dos aguas/Of the Two Waters, 2007. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

Rubio was born in Miami, Florida. His parents left Cuba in 1956, around three years before the Cuban Revolution. In his speech, Rubio makes it clear that he sees himself entirely as an heir to Christian Europe, with nothing of the rich culture of his parents’ Cuba – a culture built on the heritages of Africa, Asia, and the Indigenous peoples of the Americas as much as on those of Asturian, Galician, and Catalan migrants from the Iberian Peninsula.

The Cuban Revolution gradually sought to dismantle the old racist hierarchies of plantation society and build a society of equal Cuban citizens. This is the kind of decolonisation that Rubio abhors.

During the era of decolonisation and socialism, Rubio said, “many came to believe that the West’s age of dominance had come to an end and that our future was destined to be a faint and feeble echo of our past.” But the leaders of the Atlantic world did not buckle. “Our predecessors recognised that decline was a choice, and it was a choice they refused to make.”

Ihosvanny Cisneros, Angola, Riots and Rage, 2011. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

So, Rubio argued, today the leadership in the West must stand firm and reject what he presents as inevitable decline, defend Western values against communism, and commit themselves to new forms of colonialism (whether in Gaza or in the Western Hemisphere).

What kind of Europe does the United States seek to ally with? In Rubio’s words: “A Europe that has the spirit of creation of liberty that sent ships out into uncharted seas and birthed our civilisation” – in other words, a colonial Europe for an imperial United States.

The European leaders in the hall greeted Rubio with a standing ovation. They are perfectly comfortable with a few colonial wars if the United States is beside them to provide military support and protection.

There was no outrage at Rubio’s speech, no dismay at the naked display of Western chauvinism and colonialism. For the European leadership, it seems unacceptable to be critical of Europe’s democratic norms but utterly acceptable to champion the return of Western colonialism.

As a new mood grows in the Global South to exercise sovereignty and build a dignified life for the peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the leaders of the Global North celebrate the Age of Columbus and cheer on a return to that era.

They want to break into their museums, put on morriones (the helmets of the conquistadors), get into their Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II fighter jets, and bomb the daylights out of the peoples of the South. This is what the United States did to Venezuela on Jan. 3, what they have been doing to Palestine, and what they want to do to Cuba and the Sahel.

They might have vast military power, built with their plundered treasure, and they might be able to use this power to instil fear among large parts of the human population, but they will never garner respect or submission.

That is clear from the reaction around the world to the flagrant violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty, from the way people have rallied in support of Cuba in the face of attempts to suffocate the Cuban Revolution, and from the outrage of almost every single inhabitant of this planet at the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.

Kelly Sinnapah Mary, Guadeloupe, Notebook of No Return, 2017. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

In December 2025, Algeria’s lower house of parliament unanimously approved a bill declaring that French colonisation of their land from 1830 to 1962 was a crime against humanity.

The Algerian government had pressed the issue at the African Union (A.U.) previously, which in February 2026 adopted a resolution to designate Nov. 30 as the African Day of Tribute to African Martyrs and Victims of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, Colonisation, and Apartheid; to convene an International Conference on Crimes of Colonialism, which the resolution describes as “genocide against the people of Africa;” and to seek “international recognition and redress for these historical crimes.”

Vote at the General Assembly

The vote on the General Assembly resolution on reparations for slavery. (U.N. TV)

On the International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade today the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on the former slave-owning nations to apologize and pay reparation for slavery. 

[The vote was 123 favor, 3 against, and 52 abstentions. The only three nations that voted against were the United States,  Israel and Argentina. The European Union abstained as a bloc. The U.S. and E.U. of course benefited from the slave trade and descendants today of slave owners in those countries inherited the profits of slavery while the descendants of slaves inherited the debt.

The U.S. and British delegates told the Assembly that among other reasons, they could not support the resolution because slavery was not against the law when it was carried out.  The resolution, which is not legally binding, urges U.N. member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and setting up a fund for reparations]

Ghana’s President John Dramani Mahama had tabled the resolution which recognised the Transatlantic Slave Trade as the “gravest crime against humanity.”  [European delegates said they abstained in part because of this “hierarchy” of crimes against humanity.]

 “All peoples of African descent have been waiting for this day,” Mahama said. “The truth cannot be buried. The legal foundations are sound; the moral imperative is undeniable.”

On one side of the Mediterranean Sea, the Global North sees colonisation as positive and suggests its return, while on the other side, the Global South excoriates it with historical fact and calls for reparations. Mahama’s comments and the G.A. resolution come in the wake of the release of Kwesi Pratt, Jr.’s book Reparations: History, Struggle, Politics, and Law, for which Mahama wrote an incisive foreword.

In the book, presented at the A.U. summit in Malabo (Equatorial Guinea) in July 2025 and released in Accra in September 2025, Pratt argues that the Global North owes the African people between $2 and $3 trillion in unpaid wages and between $4 and $6 trillion for unpaid colonial extraction.

Combined, this amounts to between $6 and $9 trillion. At the upper end, this is a tenth of the Global North’s annual GDP, and it is vastly greater than the African continent’s total external debt of $1.5 trillion (which, at the very least, should be wiped out as a gesture of contrition).

Maria Auxiliadora da Silva, Brazil, Parque de diversoes /Theme Park, 1973. (Via Tricontinental Institute)

Meanwhile, in the Caribbean, Prime Minister Gaston Browne of Antigua and Barbuda threw off his suit, put on a bandana, and, under the name “Gassy Dread,” teamed up with reggae star Gramps Morgan to release the single “Reparations” in February.

Here are some of the lyrics:

Reparations, justice must come
Africa and the Caribbean as one.
Not charity, but exposing them bold
Restitution for the labour and the gold.
Across the ocean, torn from the land,
Chains on the feet, whip in the hand.
But Jah light carried us through the storm
Now a new day of justice is born.

They plundered bodies, diamonds, and cane.
Generations carried the weight and the pain.
But the people strong, we still survive.
Now it’s time to let justice arrive:
Reparations, justice must come.

Indeed. Prime Minister Browne should send a link to his song to Marco Rubio and to all the European heads of government. Rubio longs for the colonial ‘spirit’ that sent ships into ‘uncharted seas’.

But the people of the Global South remember what those ships carried – and what they took.

If the Atlantic world wants to speak of ‘civilisation’, let them begin with restitution: cancelling illegitimate debts, returning stolen wealth, and paying reparations for centuries of colonial plunder and neocolonial extraction.

The era of colonial impunity is over. Justice must come.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He is a senior non-resident fellow atChongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations.  His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and, with Noam Chomsky, The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the Fragility of U.S. Power.

This article is from Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

12 comments for “Vijay Prashad: UN Approves Slavery Reparations

  1. Ishmael Forester
    March 28, 2026 at 13:34

    The argument is total nonsense. There is no such thing as ‘justice’ in a financial transaction like that, at this point. Okay, the West pays trillions of ‘reperations.’ Where is that money coming from? Where will it go? It will come from the tax-payers in the West, and will be largely spent on the products of overwhelmingly Western-centred business. It will just enrich the greedy rich in the richer world more, eventually. The whole idea is just a merry-go-round joke. The rich probably even promote the idea of ‘reperations’ because they know it will ultimately make them bank. I mean think about it for a solid second. Give an African governmet a trillion dollars. What are they going to spend it on? The obvious thing to do would be to spend on products that everybody wants, the profiteering from which is largely Western anyway. Am I missing something here?

    • April 8, 2026 at 00:58

      Perhaps reparations could be made in a more meaningful form: not a financial transaction based on a system of debt peonage, but an actual transfer of material wealth – not a fiat currency that is losing its value – and more importantly, a transfer of the means for producing wealth. Thus money need not be transferred. With no money transferred, the question of where it will go is not relevant. Naturally, the concept of a more meaningful form of wealth transfer and the means for producing wealth would need to be elaborated. Suffice it to say that throwing money at a problem is not necessarily a solution, as Ishmael emphasizes here.

  2. Siden04
    March 27, 2026 at 08:11

    ‘…communists in Vietnam (1945), China (1949), and Cuba (1959) prevailing against all odds to inaugurate communist experiments in poorer nations.’

    “The truth must not only be the truth, it must be told.” – Fidel Castro.

    In the ‘socialist republic’ of Vietnam, some are more equal than others as this headline attests ‘Vietnamese tourist in Thailand reunited with his lost $194,000 Richard Mille watch’ (Yahoo, 3 February, 2023).

    ‘China is now an integral and irreplaceable part of global capitalism’ (Consortium News, 28 July 2020).

    This is what Fidel said when urging Mexican businesspeople to invest in Cuba, in 1988:_“We are capitalists, but state capitalists. We are not private capitalists.” (Daum, Walter , 1990,. The Life and Death of Stalinism).

  3. common sense
    March 26, 2026 at 14:04

    I hope, that those paying the reparations will be in the very first place those individuals and family dynasties who have been profiting the most from the brutal slavery.

    They are rich and powerful today, because of the crimes their ancestors committed.

  4. Cern Eukrinowicz
    March 26, 2026 at 07:43

    Wonderful. So the European serfs, who for centuries were oppressed into forced labor to build the wealth of the European elites in their castles on the hill, are now going to be required to pay reparations to the people outside of Europe who were later oppressed into forced labor.

    Europe’s wealth and power was built on the forced labor of Europeans. But, white on white crimes are now ignored, and the only thing that matters is now skin color, and the former serfs are thereby declared guilty of having a guilty color on their skin. But still there is a ‘von’ ruling Europe, so no change in the castles on the hill. The vons won’t mind as long as they can pass the costs on to the current wage-serfs who will work even more overtime and pay higher bills.

    • Afdal
      March 26, 2026 at 16:14

      Both European serfs and Black slaves are long dead. That’s the real problem with any of these calls for reparations: justice for historic crimes is a phantom when the perpetrators and victims are both dead. Furthermore, the actual mechanics of human ancestry don’t function in a way that conveniently facilitates intergenerational reparations. The offspring of historic victims and perpetrators had BOTH mothers and fathers. And with each generation you can double that, compounding the amount of ancestral history that one may have to dismiss in order to decide who should be paid reparations and who should pay them.

      It’s disappointing that a Marxist like Prishad would throw away his materialist understanding of the world to validate an essentialist construct like an “African people” or a “European people”. They don’t exist. Real human ancestry and real human genetics are an enormous pastiche of past lives and experiences that led to our present conception. Human populations move, they intermarry, they do things that make in impossible to establish consistent categories of living people based on a single event in the past. What one of many ancestors did or had done to them may have no bearing on a living person’s current situation. Is a child conceived of rape supposed to kill themselves to punish the rapist? Given the hundreds if not thousands of generations humanity has existed as a species, it’s practically a mathematical certainty that every living person alive today is the descendant of rape. How do we atone for this crime? We cannot.

      The way to deal with the historic consequences of slavery, colonialism, exploitation, violence, etc is not with the intangible phantom of reparations. If you want to deal the results of generations of inherited wealth and inherited poverty, the performative politics of reparations is not up to the task. The performative politics of reparations are divisive in nature, impractical to build effective political coalitions to make happen, and impractical to actually implement. The answer to actually existed poverty affected living people today is the practical politics of broad spectrum anti-poverty programs. It’s the practical politics that address the class conflict at the heart of poverty.

    • Otto
      March 27, 2026 at 07:40

      No mention of the Arab slave traders? They will pay nothing?

      • Consortiumnews.com
        March 27, 2026 at 09:41

        The details of the resolution have not yet been released.

  5. Digby
    March 26, 2026 at 06:53

    To play devil’s advocate, what difference is there between ‘abstain’ and ‘against’?

  6. Ian
    March 26, 2026 at 05:24

    The UN should be defunded. Does not do what it is supposed to do, keep world order, but meddles in affairs none of its business.

  7. Johnny
    March 25, 2026 at 20:18

    The ‘againsts’ and ‘abstainers’ are condemned by their actions.
    Past and present.

  8. Steve
    March 25, 2026 at 17:24

    Where does this madness stop ?

Comments are closed.