Robert Parry wrote: Dec. 9 has a grim meaning for the U.S. Republic, the date in 2004 when Gary Webb was driven to ruin by vindictive colleagues, demarcating when the U.S. press went from protecting people to shielding corruption.
By Robert Parry
Special to Consortium News
CN at 30
November 9, 2015
Looking back over my four decades in the national news media, it’s hard to identify one moment when American journalism died. The process was a slow and ugly one, with incremental acts of cowardice accumulating until mainstream reporters were clearly part of the problem, not anything to do with a solution. But the date Dec. 9 has a special place in that sad progression.
It was on Dec. 9, 2004, when the mean-spirited mainstream media’s treatment of investigative journalist Gary Webb led him his career devastated, his family broken, his money gone and his life seemingly hopeless to commit suicide. It was a moment that should have shamed all the big-shot journalists who had a hand in Webb’s destruction, but it mostly didn’t.
Webb’s offense was to have revived the shocking story of the Reagan administration’s tolerance of cocaine smuggling by the C.I.A.-backed Nicaraguan Contra rebels in the 1980s. Though the scandal was real and had been partly exposed in real time the major newspapers had locked arms in defense of President Ronald Reagan and the C.I.A.. The sordid scandal apparently was deemed “not good for the country,” so it was buried.
My Associated Press colleague, Brian Barger, and I had written the first story exposing the Contras’ involvement in cocaine smuggling in 1985, but our story was attacked by Reagan’s skillful propaganda team, which got The New York Times and other major news outlets to buy into the denials.
Later that decade, a gutsy investigation by then-Sen. John Kerry filled in some of the gaps showing how the Reagan administration’s collaboration with drug-tainted airlines and other parts of the Contras’ cocaine smuggling apparatus had functioned. But Kerry’s probe was also mocked by the major media. Sniffing out that conventional wisdom, Newsweek deemed Kerry “a randy conspiracy buff.”
Kerry’s brush with this near-political-death-experience over the Contra-cocaine scandal taught him some hard lessons about survival in Washington, which help explain why he was such a disappointing candidate during Election 2004 and why he has shown such timidity in challenging Official Washington’s “group thinks” as Secretary of State.
For both U.S. journalists and politicians, there was no upside to doing the hard work of exposing this kind of crime of state. [See Consortium News‘ “What’s the Matter with John Kerry.”]
Same Stonewall
In 1996, Gary Webb encountered the same stonewall when he stumbled onto evidence showing that some of the Contra cocaine, after being smuggled into the United States, had flowed into the production of “crack” cocaine in Los Angeles and contributed to the “crack epidemic” of the 1980s.
When he published his findings in a series for the San Jose Mercury News, the major newspapers had a choice: either admit that they had slinked away from one of the biggest scandals of the 1980s or redouble their efforts to discredit the story and to destroy anyone who dared touch it. They went with option two.
In a tag-team pummeling of Gary Webb, The Washington Post, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times all denounced Webb and decried his reporting. Soon, Webb’s editors at the Mercury News were feeling the heat and rather than back their reporter, they sought to salvage their own careers. They sold Webb out and he was soon out of a job and unemployable in the mainstream media.
Please Donate to CN’s 30th Anniversary Winter Fund Drive
The bitter irony was that Webb’s reporting finally forced a relatively thorough and honest investigation by the C.I.A.’s Inspector General Frederick Hitz, who concluded in 1998 that not only were the Contras involved in the drug trade from their start in 1980 and through the entire decade but that C.I.A. officers were aware of the problem and helped cover it up, putting the goal of ousting Nicaragua’s Sandinista government ahead of blowing the whistle on these corrupt C.I.A. clients.
Yet, even the C.I.A.’s confession wasn’t enough to shame the major newspapers into admitting the truth and acknowledging their own culpability in the long-running cover-up. It remained easier to continue the demonization of Gary Webb.
At Consortiumnews, we were one of the few news outlets that examined the extraordinary admissions contained in the C.I.A.’s two-volume report and in a corresponding Justice Department Inspector General’s report, which added more details about how criminal investigations of the Contras were thwarted. But, sadly, we lacked the reach and the clout of the major newspapers.
As the controversy bubbled in 1996, I also had joined with Webb in several speaking engagements on the West Coast. Though we sometimes spoke to large and enthusiastic crowds, the power of the Big Media overwhelmed everything, especially the truth. [See Consortium News “The Sordid Contra-Cocaine Saga.”]
Webb’s Demise
In the years after the Contra-cocaine story was buried once again, I lost touch with Webb who had landed a job with a California state legislative committee. So, I didn’t realize that after that job ended, Webb’s life was spiraling downward. Even modest-sized newspapers refused to consider hiring the “disgraced” reporter.
Webb’s marriage fell apart; he struggled to pay child-support and other bills; he was faced with a forced move out of a house near Sacramento, California, and in with his mother. Deeply depressed, according to his family members, Webb chose to end his life.
On Dec. 9, 2004, the 49-year-old Webb typed out suicide notes to his ex-wife and his three children; laid out a certificate for his cremation; and taped a note on the door telling movers, who were coming the next morning, to instead call 911.
Webb then took out his father’s pistol and shot himself in the head. The first shot was not lethal, so he fired once more. (Yes, I know that conspiracy theorists have seized on the two shots to insist that Webb was murdered by the C.I.A., but there is no proof of that and by pushing that baseless account, people simply let the real culprits the big newspapers off the hook.)
After Webb’s body was found, I received a call from a reporter for the Los Angeles Times who knew that I was one of Webb’s few journalistic colleagues who had defended him and his work. I told the reporter that American history owed a great debt to Gary Webb because he had forced out important facts about Reagan-era crimes. But I added that the Los Angeles Times would be hard-pressed to write an honest obituary because the newspaper had essentially ignored Hitz’s final report, which had largely vindicated Webb.
To my disappointment but not my surprise, I was correct. The Los Angeles Times ran a mean-spirited obituary that made no mention of either my defense of Webb, nor the C.I.A.’s admissions in 1998. The obituary was republished in other newspapers, including The Washington Post.
Even though Webb’s reputation posthumously received some rehabilitation with a sympathetic portrayal of his ordeal in Jeremy Renner’s 2014 movie, Kill the Messenger, some news executives who aided the Contra-cocaine cover-up in the 1980s and abetted the destruction of Webb in the 1990s still won’t admit their complicity in suppressing one of the most important stories of that era, people such as The Washington Post’s Jeff Leen and Leonard Downie.
[See Consortium News “WPost’s Slimy Attack on Gary Webb and “How the Washington Press Turned Bad.”]
A few journalists have continued to find nuggets of the Contra-cocaine scandal, including from accounts by former C.I.A. contract pilot Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, who supplied details about his work ferrying guns and drugs for Reagan’s Contras, as reported by John McPhaul of The Tico Times, based in San Jose, Costa Rica. Even Fox News poked into the Contra-cocaine connection in an article about alleged C.I.A. complicity in the 1985 torture-murder of Drug Enforcement Administration agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena.
But the resistance from the major U.S. news media and the ferocity from Reagan’s acolytes whenever their hero’s legacy is challenged have left this very real scandal in the netherworld of doubt and uncertainty, a key chapter of America’s Lost History in which Dec. 9, 2004, conveys a baleful message.
The late Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. He founded Consortium News in 1995 as the Internet’s first investigative magazine. He saw it as a way to combine modern technology and old-fashioned journalism to counter the increasing triviality of the mainstream U.S. news media.
Please Donate to CN’s 30th Anniversary Winter Fund Drive 



Okay it went up!~
Gary Web got onto something bigger than the CIA & DEA importing cocaine for distribution in the U.S.. Iknow it is hard to believe. You best believe it.
He knew Danny Casolaro. Danny was murdered in his Sheraton hotel room in Aug 10th 1991. Both of his wrists had been so badly damaged, no way plausible he could have slashed both of his wrists so badly, neither would have been able to function. If both wrists where slashed he cold not physical been responsible for killing himself. Think about it!
All his papers were missing, he was murdered and Gary knew it. Danny had the great misfortune to have learned of “Octopus”. Octopus was, possibly is still is reference to the PROMIS software Bill Hamilton and his wife had developed for a government contract. Stolen by the U.S. Government.
I have news for some here. We have had very bad people doing just as they please for far too long now. MONEY, it’s a drag!
If CIA allowed killing of a sitting president they would allow anything if the right people were invovled. Especially if it were CIA people!
I had a good friend who was a senior investigative reporter for a major west coast paper. He and a colleague from a major east coast paper had been put in contact with a high ranking importer of the substances mentioned. They met in a cornfield in the middle of nowhere so anyone approaching would be visible. This informant, well connected politically, was confirmation of what Gary Webb had reported. The kicker? He had Bush’s private phone number. Sounds incredible; I wouldn’t believe this, either, had it not come from someone I had known for decades. By mutual agreement with editors and publishers, the story was not run–too hot and too dangerous. But it means there were more than just a few people who knew at the time.
The other unforgivable aspect is these drugs were deliberately sold in urban areas. Then the residents were blamed for their own suffering and castigated as dangerous criminals who deserved serious prison time. The vicious hypocrisy of the War on Drugs!
Robert Parry’s piece is about how 12/9 has a somber but very important meaning: For being right, for telling the truth, Gary Webb was destroyed. And thereby so were journalistic standards.
In truth there are a lot of Gary Webb’s in the world today, performing the herculean job of shining light thru endless layers of state concealment of state crimes. Praise be to all of them. Great article remembering both Webb and Parry.
Although a bit painful to revisit, thanks for re-posting this from Mr. Parry. I have to admit that I was among the skeptical and conspiracy-mined folks who questioned Gary Webb’s suicide by the fact that he shot himself twice in the head with a revolver, which is unlikely. However, Bob knew the situation from the inside and the family also said it was suicide. In this case, the blame goes to the back-stabbing sycophants who threw him under the bus and that led to his utter despair.
Thanks to Bob, Gary, and other great journalists, we know that the CIA has been involved in running drugs (and weapons) to raise funds for “black ops budgets” that often fund illegal operations. Of course I have no hard evidence, but I have a strong suspicion that the CIA is working with the drug cartels. I know this is wild conjecture and speculation, but it would be a good off-budget revenue stream, as well as leverage on the Mexican government. Of course officially, it would break multiple US and intl. laws (how quaint, I know), but that’s common practice. There is so much flagrant lawlessness and corruption in high places lately, it is hard to keep track.
The obvious lies about Venezuela running drugs is pure projection, and gross hypocrisy on the part of the DT2 regime, not to mention mass murder. (and the dude they call the president pardoned convicted a major drugs trafficker Juan Hernanzez after all) The lies about Venezuela conveniently distract attention away from where the drugs are really transported, as well as distract from Epstein scandals, etc. It also takes attention away from very probable cooperation (directly or indirectly) with the drug cartels. The US regime does not seem a bit interested in going after illicit drug smugglers at all. It all appears very convenient for them, deadly and dangerous for others.