Britain & Pinochet’s Escape From Justice

Shares

Declassified files from 25 years ago show how the U.K. government allowed Chile’s former dictator to evade extradition to Spain, John McEvoy reports.

Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet with his wife Lucía Hiriart in 1983. (Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0 cl)

By John McEvoy
Declassified UK

  • Margaret Thatcher made a secret deal with Pinochet during the 1980s, files indicate
  • Tony Blair’s senior adviser commented: “It would obviously be embarrassing if all this came out”

On March 2, 2000, Augusto Pinochet walked falteringly across the tarmac at RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire and boarded a Chilean air force jet, marking his final steps on British soil.

The former dictator had just been declared unfit to stand trial by Britain’s home secretary, Jack Straw, and was allowed to return to Chile with immediate effect.

Pinochet had spent the previous 16 months on house arrest in Britain, awaiting the outcome of a Spanish extradition request for human rights violations committed under his regime.

Between 1973 and 1988, Chilean state agents were responsible for over 3,000 deaths or disappearances and tens of thousands of cases of torture and political arrests. The Spanish extradition request for Pinochet included charges of murder and torture.

The U.K. government’s decision to allow Pinochet to escape justice was consequently met with outrage, particularly after the despot seemed to show miraculous signs of recovery upon his arrival in Santiago.

Many suspected that a political agreement had been reached to allow Pinochet to return to Chile under cover of a contentious medical report, which claimed he was unable to instruct his lawyers.

Recently declassified files now indicate how the legal process had been complicated by a secret deal made with Pinochet by Margaret Thatcher during the 1980s. 

Thatcher, the files suggest, had promised the dictator medical assistance in Britain in return for Chile’s military and intelligence support during the Falklands War in 1982.

The documents further show how the idea to release Pinochet on health grounds had been discussed at length behind closed doors, with the Chilean authorities pushing a “humanitarian” solution to the crisis.

Jeremy Corbyn MP, a prominent supporter of the campaign to see Pinochet extradited, commented:

“All the time there was pressure to allow Pinochet to go back… This concoction about his health was developed and we were told that he was a man who was losing his memory, age was taking over, and he would not be fit to face trial.”

‘Embarrassing if This Came Out’

Holmes in 2016. (Chatham House / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 2.0)

The warrant for Pinochet’s arrest was executed just before midnight on Oct. 16, 1998, at the London Clinic, a private hospital in England’s capital.

It was issued so late into the night because “intelligence stated Pinochet was planning to leave the hospital and the country imminently,” a declassified Metropolitan Police briefing notes.

British plain clothes officers stationed at the hospital were also “discreetly armed” to prevent Pinochet’s “assisted escape from police custody” into the nearby Chilean embassy.

As the police officers executed their legal duties, news of Pinochet’s detention began to reach Whitehall, sparking frenzied internal discussions forecasting a potential political firestorm.

One of the most remarkable dispatches was sent to then U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair from his principal private secretary, John Holmes, on the day of Pinochet’s arrest.

“You should be aware that the Spanish authorities have asked for the extradition of General Pinochet, who is currently in London undergoing medical treatment,” Blair was informed.

“The position is rather more complicated than it might seem,” Holmes continued. “Apparently we have an understanding with him from the past, because of our cooperation with the Chileans against Argentina at the time of the Falklands crisis, that we would help him with medical treatment in London.”

Holmes observed ominously: “It would obviously be embarrassing if all this came out.”

Fearing Argentine expansionism, the Pinochet regime had provided Britain with military and intelligence support during the Falklands war in return for lucrative arms deals which included the sale of Hawker Hunter jets and Canberra photographic reconnaissance aircraft.

Several files on the Chilean regime’s support to Britain during the war remain classified by the U.K. Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office.

Despite these complications, Holmes remained cautiously optimistic about the Pinochet case. “This might all come to nothing, with luck,” he told Blair.

Holmes added: “The Home Office share my view that it is best if the extradition request goes nowhere,” seemingly betraying Jack Straw’s initial position on the matter.

‘Compassionate Grounds’

 Blair with Henry Kissinger at the Munich Security Conference in 2014. (Tobias Kleinschmidt /Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 3.0 de)

Holmes’ optimism was misplaced. 

Pinochet was moved into house arrest while the British courts deliberated on how to proceed with the extradition request. The House of Lords made an historic ruling that former heads of state could not enjoy immunity from prosecution for the most serious international crimes.

Throughout this period, the Chilean authorities consistently pressed the U.K. government to release Pinochet on “humanitarian” grounds while emphasising that U.K.-Chile relations would be damaged should Pinochet be extradited, the declassified files show.

In November 1998, Chilean Foreign Minister José Miguel Insulza met with British ministers inside Downing Street, informing them that his government “wanted to argue for release on compassionate grounds.”

Pinochet was “an 83-year-old sick man” and “should be released” for health reasons, he declared.

Insulza further noted how “Chile had better relations with the U.K. than they had with any other European country for 150 years” and that these relations would be damaged by any decision to approve Pinochet’s extradition.

The president of Chile’s Senate, Andrés Zaldívar, also lobbied the U.K. government on freeing the former dictator on compassionate grounds.

Mural outside the José Domingo Cañas Memory House in Santiago  commemorating victims of the Pinochet regime’s program of clandestine torture, detention and extermination. (Ciberprofe / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 3.0)

In early December, Zaldívar told Blair that the Senate had given him “unanimous backing” in pressing for Pinochet’s release, emphasising how “political and humanitarian factors” should be used to refuse extradition.

The Chilean authorities’ arguments were in some respects supported by internal legal advice supplied to Blair and Straw.

On Nov. 27, 1998, Cabinet Minister Charles Falconer informed Downing Street that Straw’s decision on extradition should have regard to issues including “Pinochet’s health” and “the effect on other countries… if they felt their former leaders might be at risk in this way.”

Falconer, who is married to the daughter of Britain’s former ambassador to Chile, David Hildyard, added: “The merit of dealing with it now is that return now would probably be easier than after a long court battle in which the atrocities were detailed, and Pinochet lost.”

‘Extreme National Danger’

Thatcher in 1981, during a visit to the U.S. (U.S. National Archives, no known restrictions)

It wasn’t just the Chilean authorities lobbying for Pinochet’s release.

Margaret Thatcher wrote to Blair on Nov. 25, 1998, to declare how “the right decision now is to act swiftly to release him to return home.”

Pinochet was “an old, sick man who on compassionate grounds alone should be spared what the future would otherwise hold,” she said. Referring to the Falklands War, Thatcher added that it could “only do this country’s reputation harm if it is known that those, like Senator Pinochet, who were our close friends in times of extreme national danger can subsequently expect to be treated in this way.”

Even the Vatican weighed in.

Within weeks of Pinochet being arrested, the Holy See’s foreign secretary-equivalent wrote to Blair to emphasise his conviction “that all the requisites exist for a humanitarian gesture in favour of an 83-year-old man who is sick and who had gone to London for a serious operation.”

By mid-1999, the combined pressure on the U.K. government to release Pinochet appeared to be bearing fruit when a deal was concocted among Chile, France, Spain and the U.K. for Straw to scotch the extradition request and “return Pinochet home on ‘humanitarian grounds.’”

U.K. Foreign Secretary Robin Cook reportedly told his Spanish counterpart Abel Matutes that he would “not let him [Pinochet] die in Britain,” to which Matutes responded: “I will not let him come to Spain.”

After Pinochet returned to Chile, he became the subject of scores of legal cases relating to human rights abuses and corruption. He was never sentenced, however, and died in 2006.

John McEvoy is co-directing a forthcoming documentary about Britain’s role in the rise of Pinochet. You can support the film’s crowd-funder here.

This article is from Declassified UK.

Views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

6 comments for “Britain & Pinochet’s Escape From Justice

  1. March 7, 2025 at 12:36

    The bastard didn’t walk to his escape plane. He was pushed in a wheelchair. Miraculously, on arrival in Chile, he could walk again.

    The satirical magazine Private Eye offered the magic wheelchair of Pinochet as a contest prize.

    The day the London cops arrested Pinochet I felt proud to be an Englishman. Too bad how things turned out.

  2. Vera Gottlieb
    March 7, 2025 at 12:26

    I keep referring to the US and UK as the ASSES OF EVIL…no wonder they have always gotten along so well. Despicable and odious.

  3. Gordon Hastie
    March 7, 2025 at 04:36

    So much compassion for a psychopath.

  4. Lois Gagnon
    March 6, 2025 at 18:16

    On humanitarian grounds? What a slap in the face to those who suffered torture and or were murdered under this bastard. Typical protectionism of the imperialist system imposed by the West.

  5. Rafi Simonton
    March 6, 2025 at 18:06

    Obvious political wrongs are accompanied by subtle economic ones.

    The current econ system is based on the assumptions of Milton Friedman, founder of the Chicago School of Economics. Very few of its claims are based on empirical evidence; it came out of a deep hatred of Keynesian and New Deal economics. It attained dominance through arguments by assertion, like PM Margaret Thatcher’s infamous “there are no alternatives.” There are–and they work. Just not to the sole benefit of an elite few who benefit from trickle-up econopathy.

    Friedman was an advisor to Pinochet and his horrific dictatorship. Why? Friedman said he supported the Pinochet government because “democracy interferes with market efficiency.”

    • March 6, 2025 at 23:30

      Ah yes, good old Milton Friedman.

      Milton Friedman comes across like the stereotypical glib, fast talking used car salesman. See this youtube video by Sam Seder which includes a two minute clip of Milton Friedman being interviewed by Phil Donahue.

      hxxps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulPxqpEigxM

      The clip shows what a “thoughtful outcome-based libertarian” sounds like. Friedman is called the “smug little man who advised Augusto Pinochet and his dictatorship”.

      He certainly comes across as someone who is shifty and not at all as someone who is honest and above board.

Comments are closed.