Syria Massacre Coverup Shows Danger of Assange Precedent

The precedent the U.S. government is trying to set with its persecution of Assange will, if successful, cast a chilling effect over journalism which scrutinizes the U.S. war machine, writes Caity Johnstone.

By Caitlin Johnstone

The New York Times has published a very solid investigative report on a U.S. military coverup of a 2019 massacre in Baghuz, Syria which killed scores of civilians. This would be the second investigative report on civilian-slaughtering U.S. airstrikes by The New York Times in a matter of weeks, and if I were a more conspiracy-minded person I’d say the paper of record appears to have been infiltrated by journalists.

The report contains many significant revelations, including that the U.S. military has been grossly undercounting the numbers of civilians killed in its airstrikes and lying about it to Congress, that special ops forces in Syria have been consistently ordering airstrikes which kill noncombatants with no accountability by exploiting loopholes to get around rules meant to protect civilians, that units which call in such airstrikes are allowed to do their own assessments grading whether the strikes were justified, that the U.S. war machine attempted to obstruct scrutiny of the massacre “at nearly every step” of the way, and that the Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations only investigates such incidents when there is “potential for high media attention, concern with outcry from local community/government, concern sensitive images may get out.”

“But at nearly every step, the military made moves that concealed the catastrophic strike,” The New York Times reports. “The death toll was downplayed. Reports were delayed, sanitized and classified. United States-led coalition forces bulldozed the blast site. And top leaders were not notified.”

Journalist Aaron Maté has called the incident “one of the U.S. military’s worst massacres and cover-up scandals since My Lai in Vietnam.”

Asked by the Times for a statement, Central Command gave the laughable justification that maybe those dozens of women and children killed in repeated bomb blasts were actually armed enemy combatants:

“This week, after The New York Times sent its findings to U.S. Central Command, which oversaw the air war in Syria, the command acknowledged the strikes for the first time, saying 80 people were killed but the airstrikes were justified. It said the bombs killed 16 fighters and four civilians. As for the other 60 people killed, the statement said it was not clear that they were civilians, in part because women and children in the Islamic State sometimes took up arms.

I mean, how do you even address a defense like that? How do you get around the “Maybe those babies were ISIS fighters” defense?

Reading the report it becomes apparent how much inertia was thrown on attempts to bring the massacre to light and how easy it would have been for those attempts to succumb to the pressure and just give up, which naturally leads one to wonder how many other such incidents never see the light of day because attempts to expose them are successfully ground to a halt.

The Times says the Baghuz massacre “would rank third on the military’s worst civilian casualty events in Syria if 64 civilian deaths were acknowledged,” but it’s clear that that “acknowledged” bit is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

And it really makes you appreciate how much work goes into getting information like this in front of the public eye, and how important it is to do so, and how tenuous the ability to do so currently is.

Julian Assange currently sits in Belmarsh Prison waiting to find out if British judges will overturn a lower court’s ruling against his extradition to the United States to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act for journalistic activity which exposed U.S. war crimes. War crimes not unlike those that were just exposed by The New York Times in its reporting on the Baghuz massacre. 

The precedent the U.S. government is trying to set with its persecution of Assange will, if successful, cast a chilling effect over journalism which scrutinizes the U.S. war machine, not just in the United States but around the world.

If it can succeed in legally establishing that it can extradite an Australian journalist for publishing information in the public interest about U.S. war crimes, it will have succeeded in legally establishing that it can do that to any journalist anywhere. And you can kiss investigative reporting like this goodbye.

This is what’s at stake in the Assange case. Our right to know what the most deadly elements of the most powerful government on our planet are doing. The fact that the drivers of empire think it is legitimate to deprive us of such information by threatening to imprison anyone who tries to show it to us makes them an enemy of all humanity.

Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, poet, and utopia prepper who publishes regularly at Medium. Follow her work on FacebookTwitter, or her website. She has a podcast and a book, Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.” 

This article was re-published with permission.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

8 comments for “Syria Massacre Coverup Shows Danger of Assange Precedent

  1. JonT
    November 16, 2021 at 14:04

    Excellent words as usual from Caitlin Johnstone and more kudos to CN for giving her space. Both parties record of reporting on the Assange case has been exemplary. The more this farce continues makes me want to wake up and find that it all has been a very unfortunate nightmare, but then I am not the one sitting in a high security prison actually living it.

  2. robert e williamson jr
    November 16, 2021 at 13:50

    Mass murder with extreme prejudice.

    If a homicide detective were to examine this I’m curious if he wouldn’t say that the amount of brutal force used indicate this was a crime of passion, of rage and hate. He would be accurate if he did I believe. How can one do this and sleep at night?

    Oh, I forget there are many good Christians in the U.S. Air Force just following orders.

    4500 lbs of explosives, 80 dead, equals 56.25 pounds per individual. Sounds about right for an unspeakable act of terrorism.

    Take care Catlin, be well and thanks.

  3. John Gilberts
    November 16, 2021 at 11:33

    I suspect at the end of the day we will find the NYT Syria massacre coverup story, probably a limited hangout, is still more coverup than story.

  4. Gregg Leinweber
    November 16, 2021 at 09:15

    Thanks to Dave Phillips and Arron Schmitt. These men published this in the NYTIMES and I hope they stay safe.
    So why is the grey lady running this story? Are they trying to white wash their legacy of war boosterism?

  5. Aaron
    November 16, 2021 at 05:34

    I had read that the number of veterans dying by suicide is about four times the number killed in combat since 9/11. It’s no wonder that they wind up suicidal when they are involved in these kind of atrocities killing innocent civilians. For an average person, the guilt would be overwhelming and they are indoctrinated to be silent and just follow orders, not a good state of mind to persist in. And just like in Vietnam, none of the higher ups in the chain of command who order all of the massacres are ever held to account for the crimes. And even worse, even when the public is informed of such atrocities, nobody is held responsible.

  6. Robert sinuhe
    November 15, 2021 at 15:28

    Deplorable! It be swept under the rug like all us war crimes in the Middle East.

  7. Cara
    November 15, 2021 at 13:20

    There is only one appropriate response: Defund the U.S. military.

  8. Nylene13
    November 15, 2021 at 09:50

    Free Julian Assange Now.

    “Without a Free Press, there can be No Democracy”
    Thomas Jefferson

Comments are closed.