COVID-19: How Ecuador Descended into Chaos

Guillaume Long says that under pressure by the IMF to reduce the size of the state, the Moreno government has made damaging cuts to public health.

Woman in Guayaquil after learning of a relative’s death in Ceibos Hospital. (Al Riyadh Daily, Twitter)

By Guillaume Long

In the last few days and weeks, media outlets around the world have been publishing shocking stories and images of the Covid-19 crisis in Ecuador. Scenes of corpses abandoned in the streets of Guayaquil, Ecuador’s second-largest city, have shaken audiences in Latin America and beyond.

Statistics, even the highly untrustworthy official ones, have confirmed the dire picture of a fast-accelerating crisis. Whereas on March 17 just 111 people had tested positive for Covid-19, by April 16, 8,225 were reported to be infected, and 403 people were reported to have died. Bearing in mind the difficulties of cross-country comparisons and disparities in testing, Ecuador now has the highest per capita Covid-19 death toll in Latin America and the Caribbean, and the second-highest per capita number of Covid-19 cases.

On April 16, the government official in charge of the mortuary crisis, Jorge Wated, announced: “We have approximately 6,703 deaths in these [first] 15 days of April reported in the province of Guayas. The usual monthly average for Guayas is about 2,000 deaths. After 15 days, we obviously have a difference of approximately 5,700 deaths from different causes: Covid, presumed Covid and natural deaths.”

The next day, Minister of the Interior [Ministra de Gobierno] María Paula Romo would confess: “Can I as an authority confirm that all these cases are Covid-19? I can’t, because there are some protocols to say that these cases qualify as such, but I can deliver the information and tell you that, at least, a good part of this data, their only explanation is that they are part of the contagion epicenter we had in Guayaquil and Guayas.”

The revelations are astonishing. This suggests that a likely 90 percent of Covid-19 fatalities went unreported by the government. If these 5,700 deaths in excess of Guayaquil’s fortnightly average of fatalities were Covid-19 victims, Ecuador would be the country with, by far, the highest Covid-19 per capita death toll on the planet over this period. Even if other countries are eventually shown to have underreported, it is difficult to fathom underreporting on such a grand scale. So how did Ecuador, and the city of Guayaquil in particular, with 70 percent of confirmed national cases, reach this point?

First Case Announced Feb. 29

On Feb. 29, the Ecuadorian government announced that it had detected its first case of Covid-19, thus becoming the third country in Latin America, after Brazil and Mexico, to report a case. That afternoon, authorities claimed they had located 149 people who may have been in contact with the first Covid patient, including some in the city of Babahoyo, 41 miles from Guayaquil, as well as passengers on that first patient’s flight into Ecuador from Madrid.

The next day, the government announced that six more people were infected, some in the city of Guayaquil. We now know that these numbers were greatly underestimated, and that many people had contracted the illness before displaying any symptoms. In fact, the Ecuadorian government has since established its own late projection of what may have been closer to the real numbers: rather than the seven people infected with Covid-19 it announced on March 13, a more accurate figure was probably 347; and when on March 21 it reported 397 people had tested positive, contagion had probably already extended to 2,303.

From early on, Guayaquil and its surroundings seemed to be the most affected by the spread of the virus. Despite this, initial measures to slow infections were late coming and even slower to be implemented. On March 4, after the government had already prohibited the presence of spectators at soccer games, it took the decision to allow the public to attend a Libertadores Cup soccer game in Guayaquil, which many commentators have blamed as a major contributor to the massive outbreak of Covid-19 in the city. Over 17,000 fans attended. Another smaller national league game was held on March 8.

Mid-March: Infections Rising   

By mid-March, and despite numbers of infected people quickly rising, many guayaquileños continued to go about their lives with minimal — if any — social distancing. Contagion also seems to have spread aggressively in certain well-to-do areas of the city, for example in the wealthy gated communities of La Puntilla in the suburban municipality of Samborondón, where, even after authorities had issued stay-at-home ordinances, inhabitants continued to mingle.

A high-profile wedding was attended by some of the city’s “finest,” and authorities later intervened to cancel at least two more weddings and a game of golf. On the weekend of March 14 and 15, guayaquileños congregated on the nearby beaches of Playas and Salinas.

By the end of the first week of March, the situation had deteriorated sharply. On March 12, the government finally announced that it was closing schools, establishing checks on international visitors, and limiting gatherings to 250 people. On March 13, Ecuador’s first Covid-19 death was reported. The same day, the government announced it was imposing quarantines on incoming visitors from several countries. Four days later, the government limited gatherings to 30 people and suspended all incoming international flights.

On March 18, the conservative mayor of Guayaquil, Cynthia Viteri, attempted an audacious political stunt. Facing rising infections in her city, the mayor ordered municipal vehicles to occupy the runway of Guayaquil’s international airport. In a clear breach of international norms, two empty KLM and Iberia aircrafts (with only crew on board) that had been sent to repatriate European citizens to their home countries were thus prevented from landing in Guayaquil and forced to reroute to Quito. (The next day Viteri announced that she had contracted Covid-19 and would be self-isolating. She has since recovered.)

Stay-Home Quarantine March 18

On March 18, the government finally imposed a stay-at-home quarantine. The next day, it imposed a curfew from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m. (from 4 p.m. in Guayaquil), which was later extended from 2 p.m. for the whole country. Four days later, Guayas province was declared a national security zone and militarized.

For hundreds of thousands of less privileged guayaquileños whose livelihoods depend on their daily income, staying at home was always going to be problematic, unless the government was able to intervene with an unprecedented program to cover the basic needs of the population. With a high percentage of the labor force being informal and non-salaried, and therefore especially vulnerable to the impact of income lost because of people staying at home, Guayaquil is in many regards an archetypal example of a vulnerable urban context in the developing world.

On March 23, the government announced, and later started to implement, a $60 cash transfer for the most vulnerable families. Sixty dollars in the context of Ecuador’s dollarized economy, in which the minimum wage is $400 per month, can be an important supplement in the fight against extreme poverty. But it can hardly be considered adequate to guarantee subsistence for many people barred from exercising other economic activities. Moreover, recent images of people lining up in vast numbers in front of banks in order to cash in on the government offer should raise alarm if the objective is for people to stay home.

Health Minister Resigns March 21

On March 21, Minister of Health Catalina Andramuño resigned. That morning she had announced in a press conference that she would be receiving 2 million testing kits and that these would arrive shortly. But on March 23, her successor announced that there was no evidence 2 million kits had been purchased and that only 200,000 were on their way.

In her resignation letter to President Lenin Moreno, Andramuño complained that the government had not allocated her ministry any additional budget to face the emergency. In response, the Finance Ministry argued that the Health Ministry had plenty of unused money and that it should use what had been assigned to it for the fiscal year 2020 before requesting more. But this is easier said than done, as pre-approved spending in ministerial budgets inevitably leads to difficulties in freeing up liquidity for unforeseen activities, especially on a grand scale.

Denial Response

Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno giving TV address about the Covid-19 crisis. (@carlitabeni, Twitter)

Yet, the Moreno government’s response has been denial. Government ministers and diplomatic representatives abroad were told to give interviews denouncing it all as “fake news.” The Ecuadorian ambassador in Spain denounced the “false rumors, including the one about the corpses, supposedly on the sidewalk,” as propagated by Correa and his supporters to destabilize the government. The attempt backfired; global media added to its coverage of the drama unfolding in Ecuador the government’s brazen negationism.

On April 1, after Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele tweeted, “After seeing what is going on in Ecuador, I think we have been underestimating what the virus will do. We weren’t alarmist, rather we were conservative.”

Moreno replied: “Dear fellow presidents, let us not echo fake news that have clear political intentions. We are all making efforts in our fight against COVID-19! Humanity requires us to be united.” Meanwhile, corpses continued to pile up.

Guayaquil’s authorities had announced on March 27 that these abandoned bodies would be buried in a mass grave, and that a mausoleum would be erected later. This provoked national outrage. The national government was forced to intervene to say this would not be the case, but it took four more vital days for it to act. On March 31, under tremendous pressure, Moreno finally took the decision to appoint a task force to deal with the problem.

The man at the head of the task force, Jorge Wated, explained on April 1 that the problem stemmed in part from the fact that several funeral parlors, whose owners and workers were afraid of Covid-19 contagion through their handling of corpses, had decided to close down during the crisis. This, added to the increase in deaths from Covid-19, had created a bottleneck and prevented timely burials.

The bottleneck had gradually grown as the Moreno government failed to intervene in the funeral parlors or mobilize other urgent private assets, such as refrigerated infrastructure (trucks, coolers, etc.) to manage the growing number of bodies.

Mortuary Crisis 

The mortuary crisis was the result of Covid-19 in as much as the number of dead bodies rose and people were afraid of contagion. But the bottleneck affected the management of bodies from other causes of death. The system simply collapsed. More evidence is needed to evaluate whether fear of contagion, including the fear felt by health care workers in different capacities, has been a decisive factor in the weakening of appropriate institutional responses.

The special task force seems to have at least reduced the backlog of bodies awaiting burial, but the problem is still far from resolved. France 24 reported that nearly 800 bodies have been picked up from people’s homes, outside the usual channels, by police officers dispatched by the task force. Another emergency measure has been the use of cardboard coffins, which has also fostered much public anger — expressed on social media in the midst of physical distancing policies.

These extreme measures have emboldened the notion that the official numbers of Covid-19 deaths cannot be trusted. How could a few hundred deaths suddenly throw the country in such disarray? When over 600 people died in a matter of seconds during the April 2016 earthquake, Ecuador did not face such consequences. Time seems to have confirmed that these suspicions were fully warranted.

There are other, more structural and long-term problems related to the Covid-19 crisis. Convinced of the need and under pressure by the IMF to reduce the size of the state, the Moreno government has made damaging cuts to public health. Public investment in health care fell from $306 million in 2017 to $130 million in 2019.

Researchers from the Dutch International Institute of Social Studies have confirmed that in 2019 alone, there were 3,680 layoffs from Ecuador’s Health Ministry, amounting to 4.5 percent of total employment in the ministry. In early April 2020, the health care workers’ union, Osumtransa, protested that an additional 2,500 to 3,500 health care workers were notified during the carnival holidays (Feb. 22 to 25) that their contracts were ending.

This would have hiked ministerial layoffs to roughly 8 percent. And, of course, in November 2019, Ecuador put an end to the agreement it had with Cuba in health cooperation and 400 Cuban doctors were sent home by year’s end.

Moreno’s Low Approval 

“Ecuador doesn’t have a president.” (@sandratoapanta, Twitter)

If leadership, trust, and good communication are important in times of crises, then the fact that Moreno’s approval ratings oscillate between 12 and 15 percent, some of the lowest for any president since Ecuador democratized in 1979, reflect a serious problem. There can be no doubt that the Moreno government’s current lack of popularity greatly hampers its capacity to demand collective sacrifice and uphold the rule of law.

The head of the task force’s singular April 1 public address thus sounded like a desperate attempt to make the government look serious, competent, and accountable. Wated, the official in charge of the mortuary crisis, went as far as to predict that things would get far worse before they got better, saying between 2,500 and 3,500 would die, in Guayas province alone, from the pandemic. This was still short of revelations yet to come.

But was Wated psychologically preparing the Ecuadorian people for what appeared to be a far greater death toll than what had thus far been announced? 

Wated’s admission seems to have sparked a new approach from the Moreno government. In his April 2 address to the nation, Moreno pledged to be more transparent with information on the victims of Covid-19 “even if this painful.” He publicly acknowledged that “whether for the numbers of infected or of deaths, the registers have been underestimated.”

But old habits die hard, and Moreno again denounced “fake news,” even blaming the current economic hardship on public debt accrued under his predecessor, Correa. Moreno claimed that Correa had left him a public debt of $65 billion even as his government’s own figures indicate that the public debt at the end of the previous government was only $38 billion (it is now over $50 billion).

All this pettiness, in the midst of a deadly crisis, will likely do little to improve the president’s credibility gap; polls show only 7.7 percent find Moreno credible. 

Three days later, encouraged by the president’s call for transparency, the deputy minister of health reported that 1,600 public health care workers had contracted Covid-19 and that 10 medical doctors had died because of the virus.

But the next day, the minister of health rebuked his deputy, and said only 417 medical workers had fallen ill; 1,600 merely referred to those who could be infected. These admissions nevertheless gave credence to health care workers’ recurrent complaints that they are ill-equipped to tackle the crisis which puts their own safety, and their families’, at risk.

Then on April 4, in this sudden flourish of ostensible governmental sincerity, Vice President Otto Sonnenholzner apologized, in another formal televised address, for the deterioration of Ecuador’s “international image.” 

A likely candidate in the February 2021 elections, Sonnenholzner has attempted to position himself as the leader of the government’s response to the crisis but has also been accused of exploiting the pandemic to promote his image. Time will tell whether Sonnenholzner succeeds in spinning his leadership, or whether Ecuador’s dramatic mismanagement of the pandemic and mortuary crisis becomes a death blow to his political ambitions.

It took the Ecuadorian government another 12 days from Sonnenholzner’s apology to finally admit what everybody had long suspected: that the government’s report of 403 Covid-19 deaths was fictitious and probably amounted to less than 10 percent of the pandemic’s casualties.

Ecuador’s Covid-19 disaster has now acquired proportions that the country’s current leadership seems ill equipped to overcome. Sadly, for the people of Guayaquil, the suffering seems far from over.

CEPR Note: This post was edited on April 18 and on April 20, and updated with new official numbers of deaths.

Guillaume Long is a senior policy analyst at CEPR. Prior to joining CEPR, Guillaume held several cabinet positions in the government of Ecuador, including minister of foreign affairs, minister of culture, and minister of knowledge and human talent. Most recently, he served as Ecuador’s permanent representative to the United Nations in Geneva.

This article is from CEPR.

Please Donate to Consortium News.


6 comments for “COVID-19: How Ecuador Descended into Chaos

  1. Guy
    April 22, 2020 at 18:10

    This is what happens when you invite the IMF into your country .When you play with serpents you WILL get bitten .
    Moreno won the last election by pretending he was for the people .

  2. April 22, 2020 at 11:46

    The most shocking message in the article is 4000 unaccounted deaths in Guayas, “triple of average mortality in the period”. That could mean massive epidemic with no one left to check what happened to the dead people. Is it possible that the reality is somewhat better, namely that Jorge Wated is innumerate?

  3. Andrew Thomas
    April 22, 2020 at 10:23

    Any government that would accept an IMF loan and the inevitable horrors that come with it can be trusted only to destroy the security and quality of life of the 99%. The difference in Ecuador is that Moreno pretended to be a completely different person during his election campaign than who he really was. He even fooled Correa. Once in office, his 180 degree turnaround happened so quickly that it is impossible to not think that the people of Ecuador were not victimized by a Manchurian candidate. But from El Norte.

  4. Dodie Schadlich
    April 22, 2020 at 05:39

    I am a Canadian living in Ecuador right now, a couple of hours from Guayaquil. Thanks for the timeline, insight and reality check on the real numbers. We knew the death rates displayed on the pretty, colorful charts were not adding up to what we could see happening around us.

    I am very disappointed at how little focus this article gives to the deaths caused by the stay-at-home policy that we face this very day. The author, as an Ecuadorian, and having been involved in the government, must understand his population demographics and that these marginalized people cannot survive without access to food daily.

    The stay-at-home policy is actually contributing to many deaths. To characterize it as “staying at home was always going to be problematic” is likely the understatement of this disastrous year.

    Within 2 days of the policy, people started going hungry, unable to work. It is not just the residents in the slums of Trinitaria, that are affected. Ecuador has wide-spread poverty. I have been in the barrios where many have no electricity, no sewer systems, water may be to the area, but not to the homes. Without fridges and working as day laborers, the people are forced to live hand-to-mouth which requires daily access to funds and food.

    The article mentions the Bono they sent out of $60. This gives the impression that everyone under a certain income level received this assistance and that is simply not true. I know many people, entire barrios of people that did not receive. After following phone numbers, sending messages and asking questions, no one could tell you how to register people that were not receiving. So while the information looked helpful and important on the front page of the newspaper, not everyone benefited. Those who found themselves on the list had to line up at banks to collect, sort of defeating the purpose of isolation.

    We are now more than a month into strict lock-down with no end in sight and the death rate is increasing. There is still no testing being done on the living or dead in our area, so it’s just a guess as to the real COD. Many are dying at home unwitnessed, except by family members. They try their best to get the bodies out of the homes as quickly as possible, sometimes that means days.

    Ask them why they are dying and they will tell you they are starving, they have no money to buy food or medicine, no transportation to access the basics. Being refused healthcare even when they can access a facility. Our local cancer center has been closed for weeks.

    Without access to basics and living over a month in extreme fear and stress, one can easily conclude that these rising death rates may not all be directly virus related, but rather a consequence of the measures in place. Since they are not testing the corpses, I guess we will never know for sure.

    I understand that we are in uncharted territory here, without a manual and without a clue. I understand that on its face, the isolation policies seem logical, but it is the implementation of these policies, in a system such as Ecuador that is the problem. It is not based on reality, and not rolled out with compassion.

    I see the military, but what I don’t see are trucks of rice being dropped in all the barrios, weekly and ongoing through to the end of this nightmare.

    Why bother saving them from a virus, to kill them with starvation? None of this makes sense.

    • Guy
      April 22, 2020 at 18:18

      Thank you for this comment .I am Canadian also and have been to Ecuador a number of times .It pains me to see this happen as I love the country and the people there . Correa had done good things for this country and I experienced it over the many trips to this country.The education system ,the infrastructure and the well being of people all ameliorated ,from my perspective from what I saw . This is indeed a nightmare for the people of Ecuador .
      Stay safe and healthy if you can.

  5. Sam F
    April 21, 2020 at 20:21

    Thank you for this glimpse of Ecuador’s decline under oligarchy. Today the total virus cases of Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba are one-seventh those of Ecuador, and one-fourth those of Colombia or Panama. The DemReps must be celebrating the efficiency of strangling the poor by installing rich scoundrels to subvert social democracies. Like the US, the Ecuadorians are paying a high price for not keeping gold out of elections and mass media, or simply imprisoning the rich and their opportunists.

Comments are closed.