Will Obama Resist Push for Iran War?

The last two American presidents who pressured Israel (Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush) lost reelection. Though the reasons for their defeats varied, their strained relations with Israel surely didn’t help, a dilemma now facing Barack Obama as Israel demands U.S. backing against Iran, as Marjorie Cohn describes.

By Marjorie Cohn

Neocons in Israel and the United States are escalating their rhetoric to prepare us for war with Iran. Even the infamous John Yoo, architect of President George W. Bush’s illegal torture and spying programs, is calling on the Republican presidential candidates to “begin preparing the case for a military strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.”

Under the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran has the legal right to produce nuclear power for peaceful purposes. The United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found no evidence that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons program. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently said on CBS that Iran is not currently trying to build a nuclear weapon.

John Yoo, former legal adviser to President George W. Bush

Nevertheless, the United States and Israel are mounting a campaign of aggression against Iran. The United States has imposed punishing sanctions against Iran that are crippling Iran’s economy, and pressuring other countries and strong-arming financial institutions to stop buying oil from Iran, the world’s third largest exporter.

The Obama administration is also preparing new punitive measures that target the Central Bank of Iran. And the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to pass the Iran Threat Reduction Act of 2011 which would outlaw any contact between U.S. government employees and some Iranian officials.

There is also evidence that Israel, with the possible assistance of the United States, has orchestrated the assassinations of at least five Iranian nuclear scientists or engineers since 2007. The New York Times reported: “The campaign, which experts believe is being carried out mainly by Israel, apparently claimed its latest victim on [Jan. 11] when a bomb killed a 32-year-old nuclear scientist in Tehran’s morning rush hour.”

These assassinations constitute acts of terrorism. There have also been cyber-attacks on Iranian centrifuges and an explosion at a missile facility last year that killed a senior general and 16 other people.

These acts of aggression are designed to provoke Iran to retaliate, including possibly closing the Strait of Hormuz, which will spark a war that could spread to the entire Middle East.


In addition, the United States has shifted combat troops and warships to the Middle East, and supplied Israel with bunker-busting bombs.

Moreover, President Barack Obama had plans to deploy 9,000 U.S. troops to Israel to participate later this year with thousands of Israeli troops in “war games” to test the U.S./Israeli air defense system (although the exercise was postponed reportedly as a signal of Obama’s displeasure with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.) The exercise was to be the largest ever joint drill between the two countries. Panetta said the exercise is designed “to back up our unshakable commitment to Israel’s security.”

Iran is not a threat to Israel’s security. Iran has not attacked any country in some 200 years. In 1953, the CIA engineered a coup that replaced a democratic government in Iran with the vicious Shah. He ruled Iran with an iron hand for 25 years, wreaking torture and terror on Iranians while keeping Iran open to Western investment.

When I visited Iran in 1978 as a human rights observer, there were dozens of U.S. corporations in downtown Tehran. One year later, the chickens came home to roost. The Iranian revolution overthrew the Shah, replacing him with a tyrannical theocracy that continues to violate the rights of the Iranian people.

But that does not mean that Iran, if it does obtain nuclear weapons, will attack Israel. The Iranian government knows that Israel and the United States would retaliate with unimaginable military force that would devastate Iran and much of the Middle East.

Article 2 of the United Nations Charter requires the peaceful settlement of international disputes between Iran and the United States. Both the U.S. and Iran are signatories of the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928, which states, “The High Contracting Parties agree that the settlement or solution of all disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them, shall never be sought except by pacific means.”

Yet the United States has been illegally threatening war against Iran, dating back to the administration of President George W. Bush.

Security Council Resolution 687, that ended the first Gulf War, requires a weapons-of-mass-destruction-free zone in the Middle East. Israel, which reportedly has an arsenal of 200-300 nuclear weapons, stands in violation of that resolution. Israel refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, thus avoiding inspections by the IAEA.

As Shibley Telhami and Steven Kull advocate in a recent op-ed in the Times, we should work toward a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East, and that includes Israel. They cite a poll in which 65 percent of Israeli Jews think it would be best if neither Israel nor Iran had the bomb, even if that means Israel giving up its nukes.


AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the Israel lobby in the United States, has tremendous support in the U.S. Congress. Even Zionist Thomas Friedman wrote in the Times last month that the standing ovation Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got in Congress “was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.”

AIPAC also exerts considerable pressure on Obama to be tough on Iran. When the new Chairman of the joint Chiefs of Staff and the new head of CENTCOM told Obama late last year they were disappointed that he was not firmly opposing an Israeli strike on Iran, Obama replied that he “had no say over Israel” because “it is a sovereign country.”

Obama does indeed have a say a strong say over Israel. The United States has pledged $30 billion to Israel over the next 10 years. Obama should inform his counterparts in Israel that if it launches a military attack on Iran, the U.S. will withhold foreign aid from Israel.

Although pressure from the neocons to support an Israeli attack on Iran will increase as the presidential elections draws near, Obama has a legal duty to refrain from actions that will lead to war with Iran.

Additionally, the U.N. Security Council, which has the duty to prevent threats to international peace and security, should order Israel and the United States to cease their aggressive provocation against Iran.

The same voices who brought us the illegal, tragic and ill-advised war with Iraq will continue to try to dominate the national conversation with battle cries against Iran. It is up to us to prevail upon our elected officials to avoid a tragic conflagration in Iran by pressuring Israel to cease and desist.

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, past president of the National Lawyers Guild, and deputy secretary general of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. Her most recent book is The United  States and Torture: Interrogation, Incarceration, and Abuse. Visit her blog at www.marjoriecohn.com

7 comments for “Will Obama Resist Push for Iran War?

  1. unclesam
    January 20, 2012 at 06:31

    now war can be won from a corrupted criminal oligharchic society mad of hypocrisy and inchoerency

  2. tired pessimist
    January 19, 2012 at 17:25

    John- What has been our core interest in the Middle East? Maybe the need to ensure stability of our energy supplies? Maybe to protect an ally against being destroyed? Fine. But where is the interest in destroying another country’s civilization on the false pretext that the country is preparing to attack us when it is not, or to stand by while an ally might be doing the same, or to rob another country of its resources, or to kill its citizens through extrajudicial assassinations when it is antithetical to the rule of law and human rights that we want to believe our great nation stands for. And when an ally has done these things to another people, we should not be denying that history or the truth of the dispossession, but should be putting an end to the conflict and prodding and encouraging the parties to reach a just and peaceful resolution. We need to be honest with, instead of deluding ourselves about all of this.

    We have not only military power, but the leverage of soft power and diplomacy if we wish to use it. The Middle East is incredibly rich in resources and human talent. There is enough for everyone in a region that could become a jewel and model for the rest of the world. Survival, prosperity, trade, peace, and justice are what is in our interest, and in the world’s interest, for the short term and the long term.

    With the exponential growth of the military and the intelligence institutions here, and the tremendous wealth and power that fund and enable them, it is questionable whether we will ever be able to reach those goals. But disclosing the facts, and being honest about them is a first step.

  3. john
    January 19, 2012 at 03:00

    The article is written based upon realities of the world, even though some parts are not following this approach, such as the matter that in case of attacking Israel by Iran the U.S. will devastate Iran and the whole Middle East. Because it is in confrontation of the U.S. interests in the region. if that is going to be taken, the U.S. should choose between the integrity of Israel and its interests in the well-riched oil producing Middle East.

  4. Big Em
    January 18, 2012 at 23:53

    This article certainly has a WHOLE lot more truth in it than anything I’m hearing (albeit reluctantly) from the MSM- – – and of course Fox Noise is out of the question …. they’re in favor of virtually any armed ‘solution’, even to the point of supporting (very quietly and grudgingly) their anti-Christ Obama as long as he’s killing some dark-skinned foreigners somewhere.

  5. tired pessimist
    January 18, 2012 at 13:28

    It is astounding that John Yoo was ever hired at Berkeley and continues to have a platform to advocate actions that constitute, and should be adjudicated as, war crimes. And it is tragic that our government has pursued such policies for so long. We seemed to have returned to another period of McCarthyism, but without any official in the Administration with the integrity, experience and insight of a George Marshall.

    The peace groups in Israel early on identified the Administration’s problem as attributable to the hammerlock that the Likud government has had over Congress- a Congress so intimidated and bought off that it has been unable to exercise independent judgment. (It would be helpful to publish a member by member list reporting voting records and campaign contributors.)

    The problem is also of the President’s own doing, and started almost immediately at the very the heart of the Administration and the Party, since Obama’s chief of staff was Rahm Emmanuel, and one of his earliest and most important financial supporters was Lester Crown of the Crown family from Chicago, that controls General Dynamics, one of the principal military contractors that supplies the advanced weaponry used in the Middle East. (This problem is apart from Obama’s decision to retain so many of the Bush neocons.)

    Presently, the Administration seems to be trying to tiptoe through the many political minefields with Iran- minefields which have included repeated attempts by Netanyahu, thr ough target assassinations and other tactics, to provoke a violent response by Iran and a pretext to start a war. While the Administration seems to want to avoid the disaster that a hot war with Iran would likely bring, it is doing its best to destabilize the government through actions that in some cases clearly violate international law. So much for the Nobel Peace Prize. Maybe the next one should be awarded to Netanyahu with the audacious hope that he doesn’t start a nuclear war or commit a genocide.

    Therefore, it is all the more important to keep publishing articles like this one and to keep educating the public as to the facts and issues, with the hope that something will register.

    • Frances in California
      January 18, 2012 at 15:41

      Take heart, tired pessimist; you are completely right in your post. You’re not the only one who knows and feels this way. Please don’t give up; vigilance is required to keep the entire country from getting “ACORNed”.

  6. Fibonacci65
    January 18, 2012 at 11:14

    Great article, many thanks, and I hope your writings will help make a difference. However, Obama also had a legal duty not to sign the NDAA bill, lotta good that did. You are right in saying it is up to the people to stop this next invented quagmire of Vietnam-Iraq-Afghanistan and far worse. Oh wait, although 100,000 marched against the Iraq war (I did) and it was barely reported in the media. Dark times ahead, I fear.

Comments are closed.