Independent Investigative Journalism Since 1995

donate.jpg (7556 bytes)
Make a secure online contribution
Go to to post comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Get email updates:

RSS Feed
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Google

contactContact Us

Order Now


Age of Obama
Barack Obama's presidency

Bush End Game
George W. Bush's presidency since 2007

Bush - Second Term
George W. Bush's presidency from 2005-06

Bush - First Term
George W. Bush's presidency, 2000-04

Who Is Bob Gates?
The secret world of Defense Secretary Gates

2004 Campaign
Bush Bests Kerry

Behind Colin Powell's Legend
Gauging Powell's reputation.

The 2000 Campaign
Recounting the controversial campaign.

Media Crisis
Is the national media a danger to democracy?

The Clinton Scandals
Behind President Clinton's impeachment.

Nazi Echo
Pinochet & Other Characters.

The Dark Side of Rev. Moon
Rev. Sun Myung Moon and American politics.

Contra Crack
Contra drug stories uncovered

Lost History
America's tainted historical record

The October Surprise "X-Files"
The 1980 election scandal exposed.

From free trade to the Kosovo crisis.

Other Investigative Stories



The US Empire Targets Iran

By William Blum
December 4, 2010

Editor’s Note: For the past several years, it’s been clear that Iran has replaced Iraq at the top of the U.S. government’s roster of most hated governments and that, therefore, the American people get fed a steady diet of anti-Iranian propaganda. Every negative in that country is exaggerated and trumpeted by leading U.S. news outlets.

This pattern is nothing new – and the application of propaganda against some Official Enemy has been a technique used by many other countries as well. However, as historian William Blum notes in this guest essay, the new WikiLeaks documents demonstrate how intense this latest campaign is:

One of the most common threads running through the WikiLeaks papers is Washington's manic obsession with Iran.

In country after country the United States exerts unceasing pressure on the government to tighten the noose around Iran's neck, to make the American sanctions as extensive and as painful as can be, to inflate the alleged Iranian nuclear threat, to discourage normal contact as if Iran were a leper.

"Fear of 'different world' if Iran gets nuclear weapons. Embassy cables reveal how US relentlessly cajoles and bullies governments not to give succour to Tehran," read a Guardian of London headline on Nov. 28.

And we're told that Arab governments support the United States in this endeavor, that fear of Iran is widespread.

John Kerry, the Democratic head of the Senate foreign relations committee, jumped on this bandwagon. "Things that I have heard from the mouths of King Abdullah [of Saudi Arabia] and Hosni Mubarak [Egyptian president] and others are now quite public," he said.

He went on to say there was a "consensus on Iran". (Guardian, Dec. 2) If all this is to have real meaning, the implication must be that the Arab people feel this way, and not just their dictator leaders. So let us look at some numbers.

The annual "Arab Public Opinion Poll", was conducted this past summer by Zogby International and the University of Maryland, in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. A sample of the results:

--"If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, which of the following is the likely outcome for the Middle East region?" More positive 57 percent, Would not matter 20, More negative 21.

--Amongst those who believe that Iran seeks nuclear weapons, 70 percent believe that Iran has the right to its nuclear program.

--"In a world where there is only one superpower, which of the following countries would you prefer to be that superpower?" France 55 percent, China 16, Germany 13, Britain 9, Russia 8, United States 7, Pakistan 6.

--"Name TWO countries that you think pose the biggest threat to you." Israel 88 percent, US 77, Algeria 10, Iran 10, UK 8, China 3, Syria 1.

"Which world leader (outside your own country) do you admire most?" (partial list) Recep Erdogan [Turkey] 20 percent, Hugo Chavez 13, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 12, Hassan Nasrallah [Hezbollah/Lebanon] 9, Osama bin Laden 6, Saddam Hussein 2. (Barack Obama not mentioned) [2010 Arab Public Opinion Poll ]

Also in Wikileaks: "during a meeting of Iran's Supreme National Security Council (an) enraged Revolutionary Guard Chief of Staff Mohammed Ali Jafari allegedly got into a heated argument with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and slapped him in the face because the generally conservative president had, surprisingly, advocated freedom of the press."

How will the White House and Israeli propaganda machines and the US media deal with this?

Their favorite whipping boy, President Ahmadinejad — oppressive dictator, stager of “fraudulent elections,” "Holocaust denier", nuclear threat to all that is decent and holy — a champion of press freedom?

And how powerful can he be? It's not mentioned whether the man who slapped him suffered any punishment.

What will we learn next from Wikileaks? That Hugo Chávez doesn't really eat babies?

William Blum is the author of Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War 2; Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower; West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir; Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire. Portions of the books can be read, and signed copies purchased, at This article was originally published in Blum's Anti-Empire Report.

To comment at Consortiumblog, click here. (To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.

homeBack to Home Page is a product of The Consortium for Independent Journalism, Inc., a non-profit organization that relies on donations from its readers to produce these stories and keep alive this Web publication.

To contribute, click here. To contact CIJ, click here.