Keep up with our postings:
register for email updates



Contact Us



Search WWW

Order Now


Imperial Bush
A closer look at the Bush record -- from the war in Iraq to the war on the environment

2004 Campaign
Will Americans take the exit ramp off the Bush presidency in November?

Behind Colin Powell's Legend
Colin Powell's sterling reputation in Washington hides his life-long role as water-carrier for conservative ideologues.

The 2000 Campaign
Recounting the controversial presidential campaign

Media Crisis
Is the national media a danger to democracy?

The Clinton Scandals
The story behind President Clinton's impeachment

Nazi Echo
Pinochet & Other Characters

The Dark Side of Rev. Moon
Rev. Sun Myung Moon and American politics

Contra Crack
Contra drug stories uncovered

Lost History
How the American historical record has been tainted by lies and cover-ups

The October Surprise "X-Files"
The 1980 October Surprise scandal exposed

From free trade to the Kosovo crisis

Other Investigative Stories


Readers React to Bush Stories

September 22, 2006

Editor's Note: Below are readers' comments about recent stories that we've posted about the Bush Family's secret history of dealing with international terrorists and then concealing the facts:

I have but one simple sentence to make:  Is the USA a monarchy with a king who can make decisions single handedly, or do we have a government that makes momentous decisions with the approval of Congress, based on facts not Presidential biased fiction?

Alan Oppenheimer


Re. Robert Parry's Sept. 21, 2006 article on the history of Bush-Iran relations, it's wonderful to see this relevant piece of history mentioned at last in the context of recent Mideast events. However, shouldn't someone at least bring up the possibility that the neocons might simply be playing the same trick once again? A pre-arranged "solution" to the present "crisis" with the Iranians, arising at the last moment and "preventing war" by giving Bush most of what he's demanded from the Iranians, would grant him a devastating October Surprise in the area of Mideast crisis-diplomacy, precisely the kind of thing which would help the GOP the most in the November elections. Such an Iranian "capitulation" at the very "brink of war" would negate Democratic criticism of Iraq and the rest of the Bushies' heretofore failed Mideast policy, and would cast Bush in the role of "Comeback Kid" just in time to regenerate his entire agenda for the last two years of his term, with his GOP congress safely reelected and his own popularity soaring once again on the wings of "national security". Then, in a year or so when the dust has settled, the Iranians would quietly receive whatever payment the Bushies agreed to make in return for their timely cooperation. Or perhaps that payment has already been made by Bush, in the form of US-led wars against both the anti-Iranian Taliban regime in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein's Iraq, as well as the ongoing reshaping of Iraq into what will likely emerge as a Shia-dominated theocracy closely allied to Iran.



Thanks for your excellent piece on Bush and the Letelier assassination. I have in the back of my mind a detail that you didn’t mention that may be pertinent. Years ago I read some document, but can no longer recall where – perhaps at the National Security Archives – indicating that U.S. military intelligence in Panama had assisted in setting up a secret Operation Condor communications network, and maintained a listening post in the Canal Zone through which it could monitor Condor communications traffic. If this is true, it means that U.S. military intelligence records may contain evidence of what the U.S. government knew about the Letelier assassination plot, and when it knew it. Maybe someone at the National Security Archives could point you in the right direction.  

On another matter, I see that the main headline in today’s N.Y. Times reads,” Top Republicans Reach an Accord on Detainee Bill; Bush Drops Key Demand; United States Will Honor Geneva Conventions on Interrogations.” Of course, this is exactly the opposite of what has actually happened, with the President succeeding in narrowing the scope of Common Article III as it applies to interrogation of CIA detainees, and in absolving CIA personnel of criminal liability under the War Crimes Act – which creates criminal penalties under US law for Geneva violations by US personnel – all the back to 1997. How and why does a major paper like the New York Times so often wind up getting the story wrong when it comes to the Bush Administration and its spin tactics. Keller and his team often seem as though they WANT to be mislead. Either that, or they’re just plain incompetent and stupid.




Back to Home Page

   is a product of The Consortium for Independent Journalism, Inc., a non-profit organization that relies on donations from its readers to produce these stories and keep alive this Web publication. To contribute,
click here. To contact CIJ, click here.