Advantage to Mr. Romney

Exclusive: Mitt Romney’s on a roll. He’s turned back suspicions about his curious departure from Bain Capital and blunted demands he release more tax returns. Now, as he surges in the polls, he’s twisted a comment by President Obama into a nasty attack ad – and almost no one is objecting, writes Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

It probably shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the “independent fact-checkers” haven’t objected to Mitt Romney’s mendacious use of President Barack Obama’s comment about how public infrastructure helps business.

After rallying to Romney’s defense that he left Bain Capital in February 1999 – despite scores of Bain documents listing him as still in charge for three more years – the “fact-checkers” have pretty much gotten out of the way on the selectively edited Obama quote and let the right-wingers distort the comments any which way they want.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney speaking at a factory. (Photo credit: mittromney.com)

The key to this lie has been to strip away the context of Obama’s remarks so the “that” in his comment is applied to someone’s business when it’s clearly meant as a reference to roads, bridges and other public investments that facilitate American business (and have been part of the U.S. public/private partnership since the nation’s founding).

In a talk in Roanoke, Virginia, on July 13, Obama was describing the contributions that the public sector and earlier generations of Americans have made toward creating conditions to help today’s businesses succeed:

“Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”

Though Obama’s syntax is slightly mangled, the context is obvious. Obama is saying that businesses did not build the roads, bridges and the Internet. In watching the actual clip, Obama’s meaning is even clearer.

But the right-wing media quickly lopped off the context. Fox News applied its classic selective editing to have Obama simply say, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.” Romney used the misleading quote in campaign ads and one of the Washington Post’s neocon columnists, Charles Krauthammer, fleshed the distortion out into a whole column.

Indeed, this distortion is now taking on the magnitude of what was done to Vice President Al Gore during Campaign 2000 when much of the press corps either went along with Republicans putting words in his mouth or blamed Gore for not defending himself better.

The most famous distortion of Gore was the apocryphal quote about him claiming to have “invented the Internet” – when he never said that – but there were other cases of his comments being twisted beyond recognition and then used as pretexts to analyze him as delusional. On Election Day, many voters told exit polls that they voted for Bush because they simply couldn’t trust Gore. [For details, see Neck Deep.]

Tipping Point

Campaign reporters – along with those “independent fact-checkers” – appear to be reaching a similar tipping point in the Obama-Romney race. It was relatively safe for reporters to write critical stories about Romney when he was running in the Republican primaries because other Republicans were leveling the accusations, but now it’s different.

With the one-on-one match-up against a Democrat, a new set of rules takes effect. The smart play now is to go light on Romney (the Republican) no matter how outlandish his remarks and go hard against Obama (the Democrat) every chance you get. This unwritten code has been understood by journalists for the past couple of generations.

Despite what you may have heard from the right-wing talkers about the media’s “liberal bias,” the reality for several decades has been that mainstream journalists fear nothing more than being labeled “liberal” by the Right. Then the Right’s well-financed media attack groups target the branded reporters and their careers never recover.

Plus, the odds are that the executive who signs the reporter’s paycheck and decides who gets promoted or fired is a conservative or neoconservative. That’s true even at places like the Washington Post, which is often called “liberal” by the Right but is actually a bastion of neocon thought.

Since there’s no comparable threat from the Left, it makes all the career sense in the world to tilt your reporting to the right and avoid the possible loss of a job and income. You can even earn extra credit if you rile up liberals with your biased writing because it will come in handy if you ever do write something that offends the Right – and you need to show “balance.”

Understanding this rule of American journalism helps explain why the “independent fact-checkers” and the likes of Post columnist Fareed Zakaria feel they must shield Romney from scrutiny about his mysterious “retroactive retirement” from Bain.

For instance, though Zakaria clearly has no detailed knowledge of the issue, he nevertheless wrote, “Whatever the paperwork shows, Mitt Romney was not running Bain Capital after February 1999.”

Zakaria then displayed his true ideological colors, toeing the Post’s editorial line, which for years has been enthusiastic about the supposed economic benefits of off-shoring American jobs. Zakaria added, “Even if he [Romney] had been [in charge], outsourcing jobs to lower a company’s costs — and ensure its survival — is not sleazy; it’s how you run a business efficiently. (Is President Obama suggesting that we put up tariff barriers to prevent outsourcing in the future?)”

That cavalier attitude about shipping U.S. manufacturing jobs to low-wage countries abroad has been neocon dogma for decades. Remember how all those smart people told us that we were entering a new “information age” in which industrial production was irrelevant and we should focus on devising stuff like new financial “instruments.” The 2008 financial collapse has done little to dent that doctrine.

Edge to Romney

In this political/media climate, one can expect that Romney will not only have an advantage in the avalanche of TV ads – endlessly blaming Obama for the poor economy – but will have that theme reinforced by the national press corps. Even many liberal talkers can’t resist repeating the self-fulfilling prophecy that the voters will punish Obama for the jobless rate.

There is, of course, a counter-narrative that is more interesting and accurate. It is whether the Republican plot – hatched at the very start of the Obama presidency to make the U.S. economy “scream” by frustrating Obama’s jobs initiatives – will succeed.

Though the U.S. press corps knows that the Republican-sabotage narrative is true – it’s been reported, for instance, by author Robert Draper – virtually every mainstream journalist knows intuitively not to mention it in the context of the struggling economy.

When poor jobs numbers come out, the journalists fall into line, saying this will hurt Obama’s reelection chances; they don’t say this is another result of the Republicans holding the U.S. economy hostage and trying to sabotage the President’s reelection.

Pile onto that the media’s timidity about simply correcting distortions, like Obama’s selectively edited quote regarding the importance of a public infrastructure for business success, and you have a good idea where the presidential campaign is headed over the next few months.

To read more of Robert Parry’s writings, you can now order his last two books, Secrecy & Privilege and Neck Deep, at the discount price of only $16 for both. For details on the special offer, click here.]  

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & ‘Project Truth’ are also available there.

Share this Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • email

11 comments on “Advantage to Mr. Romney

  1. Not true because the tax return issue is NOT going to go away.
    Besides, the national polls mean absolutely nothing because it will all come down to six or seven swing states, where Obama is doing just fine thank you very much.
    Check the polls in the swing states, that’s where Obama will win and remain the POTUS.

    • Larry on said:

      I agree that the tax return issue is not going away. The Obama people hammered it home just incisively and deep enough so it’s going to be a continual thorn in the side throughout the rest of Romney’s political
      ‘career’.

  2. Morton Kurzweil on said:

    They lie and, like any lawyer who makes a living assuming there are two or more sides to every debate, the lier is respected for his position.
    We are in a crisis of constitutional dissolution, of economic and class warfare and we are defended by lawyers at the barricades. This is a time for those who bleed in the defense of liberty must be prepared to defend this democracy from the autocratic despots of right and left. Law that promotes religious and economic beliefs – law that replaces the authority of the individual with with institutional authority must be defeated.
    Ignorance is no excuse. Allowing criminals to gain political power through corrupt practices and colluding for personal profit must be recognized for what it is – treason, betrayal of all the principles that preserve our rights and liberties.

  3. Bill on said:

    Not to mention (I’ll mention) that he stands for nothing except getting elected. He’s flip-flopped on every issue. Why are the media not pointing that out when they hammered John Kerry repeatedly for one “I was for it before I was against it.” Rmoney has flipped much, much more but is getting a free pass. Where’s the coverage of his serial lying, easily documented lying.
    Wisconsin media circled the wagons in much the same way to protect Scott Walker.
    Thank you, Robert. The check is in the mail.

  4. ilse on said:

    Romney’s offshore banking practices must not go away. What is he hiding?

  5. je_proteste on said:

    There ought to be a way to sue the electronic media and demand that they tell the entire story – with no spin: those are public airwaves. (No help ever from the corrupt FCC.)

    Meanwhile, we’re left with what – petitions and letter-writing?

  6. Baal on said:

    Parry, are you on drugs??

    Romney doesnt stand a snowballs chance in hell…

  7. Most American Jews don’t trust a Mormon Mitt Romney as the next US President. A great majority of Israeli and American Jews believe that Mitt will not be a better “friend” of Israel than Obama, who has proved his credentials during his first term. Mitt know that and that’s why he is going to Israel. According to Israeli daily YNet – Mitt will tell the Israeli leaders that he will attack Iran without considering its consequences to America – in order to boost his Jewish support at home.

    “I think when it is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president,” – Abner Mikvaner, former Chicago’s Zionist Congressman, a Federal Judge and White House counsel to former president Bill Clinton.

    http://rehmat1.com/2008/12/13/obama-the-first-jewish-president/

  8. dahoit on said:

    They both suck.And any moron who thinks this Obomba character deserves reelection on the back of lies,obfuscation,endless war,total abdication to the healthcare bloodsuckers,murder,drones,and his Unconstitutional allegiance to gun running,used Iranian car salesmen,(isn’t lying to start a war a criminal act?)and his Libyan sodomy and Syrian serial lying accommodation of alCIAda,and his latest travesty,accusing Iran and Hezbollah of crimes with absolutely no evidence,in order to please his Ziomonster masters,needs their head examined.(And what about the Guantanamo captive story,and blowback;did we kill those Israelis?)
    Rewarding this moron(with the impeccable poison ivy league resume)with reelection will only entrench the ignoring of our populace wishes by the demoncrats,who actually are a close as kissin cousins with the rethugs,and Romney,though he sucks the big whanger also,will try not to be another one and done loser,because if he keeps up his neolibcon rhetoric of disaster during his regime of inevitability,as Obomba is toast,there will be another turnover at the next election cycle,as we live our actual Groundhog day.

  9. Pingback: » Nine Circles of Hell!: Sunday Morning Edition! / This Is Hell!

  10. Kenny Fowler on said:

    Come on Robert, this match is far from over. We haven’t even finished the first set. We’ve got conventions, debates, endless soundbites still to come. We certainly haven’t heard the last about Romney’s corporate activities or his offshore millions, he can’t hide from those and will need to answer more questions. Romney pretends to understand the plight of the common man but his act is phony. If I didn’t know he had millions stashed away I’d swear he was a time share condo salesman.