UK Silences Iran’s Press TV

During the Iraq War, the U.S. took aim at AlJazeera. Now, as the information wars heat up between the West and Iran, British regulators have ordered Iran’s Press TV off the air, a move that Danny Schechter says further limits public information about the next looming crisis.

By Danny Schechter

The British media regulator OFCOM has pulled Press TV’s license to be seen in the United Kingdom, the same regulator that has done so little to police the methods of Rupert Murdoch’s media practices or BBC’s tilted coverage of the war in Iraq.

OFCOM has suddenly decided that the Iran’s global English language channel must be sanctioned by being removed and silenced. (Ironically, it was Murdoch’s BSKYB channel that carried Press TV in the UK.) Press TV also is not carried in the United States. In fact, AlJazeera, which has won global recognition for its news programming, can only be seen in a few U.S. cities. Yet, last week, its documentary on Haiti won a prestigious Peabody Award.

Press TV offers ways for British viewers to watch at its Web site, http://www.presstv.ir/

According to the UK Guardian, OFCOM’s decision involved what regulators considered a violation of the UK’s Communications Act. “Ofcom found that Press TV’s practice of running its editorial oversight from Tehran, Iran‘s capital, is in breach of broadcasting license rules in the UK,” the Guardian reported.

“Ofcom wrote a letter to Press TV in November highlighting the issue and offered a choice of two remedies. The first was to switch editorial control for Press TV’s programming to the UK, the second to transfer the broadcasting license to Iran.”

Many observers see OFCOM’s decision as more political than administrative, British payback for the recent demonstrations in Tehran at the British Embassy protesting UK policies toward Iran. Iranian police tried to control the activists and protect the Embassy, but did not do a prompt enough job, the UK believes.

There has also been no secret in the past that PressTV is based in Iran, or that Iran pays its bills. Indeed, many governments, including the U.S., fund internationally oriented channels, such as the Voice Of America and the anti-Cuban Radio Marti channel. They are seen in other counties but based in the U.S.

OFCOM also charged that a brief – Press TV says 10 seconds – interview with former Newsweek reporter Maziar Bahari was conducted “under duress.” OFCOM imposed a heavy fine of £100,000 last year on Press TV, which refused to pay it, insisting the accusation was not true. Bahari has been all over American TV promoting a book about his experiences in Iran.

Adds the Guardian, “Former Press TV presenters include Ken Livingstone, the Labour London mayoral candidate, and Lauren Booth, sister of Cherie Blair. The Press TV newsroom director, Hamid Emadi, said the channel had been taken off air in the UK for ‘for airing a 10-second news clip’ of Bahari.

“‘He claims he has been interviewed under duress. Press TV has strongly rejected that,’ Emadi added. ‘Press TV believes that Ofcom is the media tool of the British government – the same government that sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan to participate in the killing of innocent civilians.

“‘WikiLeaks cables say London and Washington have explored ways to limit the operations of Press TV in the UK. And here it comes; Press TV is removed from the Sky platform.’ He added that Press TV is examining ways of continuing to broadcast into the UK.”

I have to disclose being among many Americans who have been interviewed frequently by Press TV out of New York. No one there ever told me what to say, or not say, and I have often been quite openly critical of Iranian government practices, live comments that the channel carried, and, afterwards, had me back.

I have almost always posted those interviews on my News Dissector.com blog. I also produced a program for their InFocus program on Occupy Wall Street that I was proud of. It drew many compliments from occupiers.

One shot from that program was pulled – the cover of the Occupy Wall Street Journal carrying a photograph of a male and female occupier kissing – but that was not a big deal in the scheme of things, given that many networks, including American ones, have vigilant lawyer-run “standard and practices” departments to police their airways for violations of social mores.

Ask Janet Jackson about that!

As a general rule, in my experience I found Press TV offers more diverse views and often more professional coverage than the three U.S. networks that I have worked for. They have carried criticisms of U.S. polices that only appear on comedy shows on American TV. The West should not lecture Iran on media honesty.

I have written many books and blogs, and made films about my experience in American TV at major networks, including “The More You Watch, The Less You Know” and “WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception” about U.S. media manipulation and network complicity in miscovering the Iraq War.

I certainly do not support Iranian government repression of human rights, while at the same time I cannot support my own government when it acts in a similar way. Where are the criticisms of the arrests of more than 5,000 non-violent Occupy protesters in the U.S. since September? Also, Guantanamo anyone?

I also cannot support the West’s harsh sanctions on Iran that punish the Iranian people, more than their government, and I do not believe we should suppress Iranian perspectives in our media. (My criticism is not uniformly true, as a great Iranian film, “Separation,” just won a Golden Globe award even as its director challenges his government’s film policies.)

We need more mutual understanding and interaction between Americans and Iranians. That can’t happen easily when outlets like Press TV are being taken off the air.

I was invited as a judge in an Iranian film festival last year and have been invited back. Does my going there signal support for their government’s policies? Absolutely not! I wrote about my experiences widely.

Does it make me a propagandist in the way that so many my own former colleagues don’t seem to know the difference between being hacks, flacks and journalists? Judge us all by our work.

No one is paying me, although my travel is covered, as it would be for invitations to many events that I couldn’t afford to attend otherwise in this county and abroad. Only employees of wealthy media companies can insist that they will only travel when their companies pay, as if that makes them pure.

Underfunded independent media reporters live in a different world. They are eager to get out into the field, but often cannot afford to do so and thus are unable to report stories that are not being told.

Also, I should add, I covered the Vietnam War from the “enemy” side as well as our own and violated the South African Apartheid regime’s media rules. I am proud of that too. Journalists need to do everything they can to cover as many sides of an issue as possible.

Right now, the world media needs to criticize the hypocrisy and self-righteousness of the British regulators who are limiting freedom of the press and expression. They have launched a media war on Iran that may be a prelude to a military one. Check out PressTV on the Internet or on your phone. There’s an app for that!

At the same time, we have to be vigilant when our own freedoms are at risk because of the practices of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and proposed measures like SOPA/FIPA.

If Western governments get away with suppressing Iranian media today, ours will be next.

News Dissector Danny Schechter writes the newsdissector.com blog. His latest Book is Occupy: Dissecting Occupy Wall Street. (ColdType.Net) Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org

Share this Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • email

2 comments on “UK Silences Iran’s Press TV

  1. incontinent reader on said:

    The information reported by Press TV is not even an “Official Secret”. It is information that is already privy to the public everywhere else where the press is free. Cutting off Press TV is merely intended to deny the British public information that it should have when it deciding which political candidates to vote for and which policies it will demand its government to pursue- including its policies toward Iran- where Britain’s own history has been not only troubled, but shameful. Preventing access to such information hijacks something essential to the polity of a democratic nation, and is nothing less than a denial of a human right. (See, for example, Article 19, of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and other provisions which bar member nations from preventing communication between peoples.)

    Right now, there is a slim opportunity to create a better relationship with Iran and a chance to begin to seriously address and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict- something in the interest of Israel and all of its neighbors, as well as Britain, the United States and the rest of the world

    If however, the British government’s policy is now to cut off access, I hope is not an augur of how the British High Court will rule on the Assange case.

  2. this is incredible
    Britian’s interference inIran has been shameful since the 1900s and it continues to do the same
    is the real britian?